User talk:Antonello Ceravola

Welcome!
Hello, Antonello Ceravola, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Deja vus of Deja vus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Deja vus of Deja vus


The article Deja vus of Deja vus has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:UNSOURCED.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Deja vus of Deja vus


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Deja vus of Deja vus. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Déjà_vu. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Déjà_vu – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your article
As McGeddon (and you...) pointed out on the talk page, Wikipedia does not publish original research. We insist on reliable independent sources WP:RS to prove that a subject has been reasonably widely covered elsewhere, to prove notability (WP:GNG is the overall policy, but note that versions on other Wikipedias may differ as each Wikipedia has its own rule setting procedure). I'm afraid that anything you publish would not be independent, and we strongly discourage people from linking to their own research and publications. When those publications have independently reviewed in independently published sources, that is the time to think about an article. However, under WP:COI, we discourage people from writing about their own closely connected matters. Anyway, I wish you luck with your project. Peridon (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)