User talk:Antonia Tejeda Barros

Welcome!
Hello, Antonia Tejeda Barros, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81talk what I'm been doing 12:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, I'm Uncle Milty. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Woody Allen sexual assault allegation have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Do not add external links to blogs, and DO NOT add external links to your own blogs to Wikipedia.  &#124; Uncle Milty &#124;  talk  &#124;  04:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. El_C 15:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm I grieve in stereo. I noticed that you recently removed content from Apropos of Nothing without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I grieve in stereo (talk) 23:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Apropos of Nothing. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I grieve in stereo (talk) 21:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Warning
Hello, Antonia Tejeda Barros. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello: I have edited the page Love Gets a Room (movie) not to promote anybody, just to add the whole main cast in the right order. It's really unfair that you have deleted all the info. Therefore, I have added it again. Please keep it. The cast is now correct. Thank you very much. Many greetings from Madrid / Antonia Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 13:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes you are. You are promoting a relative (moreover, an underage relative). You can't fool me.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Please stay away from editing about that person without disclosing your conflict of interest.--Asqueladd (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't be ridiculous. I'm editing 2 pages where I know a lot about the films, since I was on set. The info I'm providing is relevant and interesting. You are harming Wikipedia. You are Spanish, right? Are you bored? Stay away from my editing. Thanks. Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 13:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I won't. You are adding an actor with an unreliable source (the reviews of the film in that place attests that the whole family is cheering that underage actor). You are unduly influenced by your connections to that actor and you are the one harming Wikipedia. If you don't take a step back, I will take your case to the administrator's noticeboard (and I have plenty of material, believe me), and you will probably end up blocked.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand your froustration (some people create, other destroy). You are the only one here who is (with this behavior) promoting actors/actresses. IMDb is the MOST reliable source in cinema (worldwide). If you don't know that known fact, that's not my problem. My contribution to these 2 pages (El buen patrón & Love Gets a Room) is crucial, necessary, interesting and important. I added all the main cast of these 2 movies in the right order, with references, and that took a lot of time and dedication. Stay away from my editing. Furthermore, your threatening is really ugly and your attitude very aggressive. I really hope that the administrators take action against your destructive behavior (reverting and reverting and reverting editing that ads very valuable information, and creating an ugly & tense atmosphere in Wikipedia). Many greetings / Antonia Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 14:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You can find this to be of your interest.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --Asqueladd (talk) 14:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

We require reliable sources, particularly for articles on living persons
There is a long-standing consensus here at Wikipedia that the Internet Movie Data Base or IMDb is not a reliable source, as it can be edited by anybody. I know that the entries for myself and my daughter were both entered by me, and not fact-checked by anybody (even though I was scrupulous about only entering information I knew to be accurate). -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  15:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * OK. That's not a problem. I have added references from Screen Daily and the 19 Festival de Sevilla too. I have many other references that I could add, to "prove" the cast, but I really don't think that will be necessary. Thanks. Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Per WP:V it is necessary to provide citations for content that has been or is likely to be questioned. Wikipedia cares less about whatever is true and more about what we can independently verify. While I understand your frustration, your poor attitude and tendency to ignore what you've been told is only going to result in more heartburn for you. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't have any heartburn. Only care for cinema, philosophy, music, and the Holocaust, and I'm happy to help Wikipedia giving my time and dedication to edit entries (I have edited many entries). When I meet "angry" editors who only make the work of others 100 times harder, it's normal I get disappointed. This attitude harms the Wikipedia community. Thanks & greetings Antonia Tejeda Barros (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)