User talk:Antonio7173

Welcome!

Hello, Antonio7173, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 16:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 17:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add a premiere date for Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood unless you can provide a source for your date. Otherwise there is no way to verify if the date is accurate or not. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 04:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

According to that sentence's reference, http://www.pbs.org/about/news/archive/2011/daniel-tiger-tca11, "...DANIEL TIGER’S NEIGHBORHOOD will launch in Fall 2012 on-air on PBS KIDS..." If you can provide a link to where you got your information about the premiere date, that would be very helpful and allow the information to be added to the article. Trivialist (talk) 12:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Universal Studios Dubailand, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You don't seem to be taking these warnings seriously. If you continue to add unsourced information like this you will be blocked, and that would be a shame.'' Dougweller (talk) 16:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at The Wizarding World of Harry Potter. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 14:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The block is also because of your edit at Universal Studios Dubailand. You have never tried to explain your unsourced claims, you simply keep reinserting them. It's time to justify your edits at the article talk pages. Dougweller (talk) 14:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello. Please do not continue to change the premiere date for Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood unless you can source it. The information as it now stands is sourced, and your edits violate WP's policies on civility and verifiability. I have alerted one of our administrators to your disruptive editing and requested that he place a block on you if you continue to vandalize this page. Sorry it had to come to this, but you refuse to listen to verifiable facts. If you do have verification for the date, you are perfectly at liberty to source it. Otherwise, let it alone or you might be blocked again. --Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable (talk) 23:14, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Universal Studios Dubailand, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You have been warned repeatedly about adding uncited information to articles. Please cease and desist, or your editing privileges may be suspended again.'' -- McDoob  AU  93  15:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Open a Door


The article Open a Door has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notability asserted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP  Boomer!   03:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Open a Door for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open a Door is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Open a Door (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GregJackP  Boomer!   02:29, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You recreated the exact same article which was previously deleted, twice. Please stop.'' Drmies (talk) 18:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for an apparent lack of ability to abide by Wikipedia's rules, including repeated recreation and insertion of content which has been removed, despite numerous warnings to you to stop, as you did at Open a Door. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)