User talk:Antonio Lopez/Archive10

CSD G6
Is there a reason why you tagged my talk page with a CSD G6 tag with twinkle? I am just wondering. Antonio Lopez (desu) 21:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * My new page script somehow managed to filter your talk page as a new article being created in the article space. I am not really sure what triggered this: The page is by no means new, and the page i tagged was apparently in the right spot. Did you try to archive the page by any chance, or did you do anything that might have created a new page? (Which was then subsequently removed as the page was removed from the list, something that happens when pages have been deleted)


 * Either way, apologies for the inconvenience. Let me assure you its something that does not happen a lot :) Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 21:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I am not sure, all I know is that my page was vandalized by a user and after I reverted it your edit came came along. Probably it was when I was reverting vandalism or the vandal created a page or something, feel free to look on my contributions to check if there is something that might of triggered it or the vandal's contributions  Antonio Lopez  (desu) 21:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, it disappeared from Special:Newpages and my own newpage list, so either it was a mistake in the script, or the page has already been removed. In either case, there is no way i can verify what it was. A well, if you didn't archive anything then i am pretty sure nothing worth keeping was lost (At most a redundant copy of your talk page) :) Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 21:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Pokemon unmerge proposal
Hello, this message is being sent to inform you that a proposal to un-merge all Pokemon articles has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pokemon. As a member of WikiProject Pokemon, your input would be much appreciated. Glass  Cobra  22:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Hookamukahpotaruhka
I see you have developed an interest in the Hookamukahpotaruhka tree. If you have any questions or comments just let me know on my account.

Jimralph —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimralph (talk • contribs) 17:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * lolwut, what do you mean? Antonio Lopez  (desu) 17:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Userpage help
It took me a while, but I just wanted to thank you for this. Keep up the great work! :) Cheers, Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :)  07:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks


Midorihana  みどり  はな  has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thanks for the help on IRC. Cheers, Midorihana   みどり  はな  01:24, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * anytime, I am at channel ##euphonium Antonio Lopez  (desu) 23:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry
I'm sorry for vandalizing the different pages on wikipedia.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

1:24 A.M.

Jason 75.108.122.63 (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Keep up the good work
Hi Antonio, I want to thank you for the good contributions you made in this wikipedia.

Also, please take a look at this deletion of a section of an article reverted before by David Barba and now the same person (Zombie) deleted it again:
 * (cur) (last) 20:22, 24 July 2008 User:David Barba (Talk | contribs) (51,438 bytes) (Undid revision 227693522; and this material is not relevant to the question of American Empire because?) (undo)
 * (cur) (last) 20:14, 24 July 2008 User:Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk | contribs) (48,385 bytes) (...remove section...)

As a side note please notice what this user Zombie is contributing Worldwar: Tilting the Balance, The Domination, World War III - some of these titles sound like a new war vision maybe, or maybe not, but it kind of simply scares me. Please let me know what is your opinion about the deletion of the historical facts in American Empire article. You can answer me in this page, as I'm watching it. Thank you ---143.112.144.129 (talk) 23:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You are welcome and thanks for leaving me a messege.  Well anyways, according to User:Inclusionist, he or she claims you added information on the wrong article and you should add it to another article displayed in Template:AmericanEmpire on the edit shown here.  You might want to contact  User:Inclusionist for more information since the user tends to edit on that subject   Antonio Lopez  (desu) 03:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi again, thank you for yor response, I really apreciate it. The feedback you gave is so much appreciated. I just want to point out that the section removed is all about "american empire" and not about another article. No article can be valid without facts. Those facts can be as well included in various lists, but it just doesn't make sense that the facts related to an article are not mentioned in that article, but only the links of some lists.


 * I am not sure if I make myself understood, please bear with me as I'm trying to explain what actually I wanted to say.
 * I think that section cannot fit anywhere else better (of course some of those facts are listed in some lists of 100s of items, but these facts I linked with this article, not many, about 5 facts, are representative for this article in special, and in the lists where they are listed, they are not linked together but dispersed among hundreds of facts in those lists.
 * So if these few facts related one to the other and with the subject of the article are not listed in this article, they lost their meaning in the lists - loose their meaning in relation to this concept and topic (american empire). And yes, it seems there are people who might find it an inconvenient true and are determined to hide it.
 * What do you think? --143.112.144.129 (talk) 21:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Why?
I'd like to know why you removed my comment to User:CptTaco's Discussion when I was asking him a simple question, thanks.Tavy08 (talk) 20:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Because you placed it in the wrong page, I moved it to CptTaco's talk page, next time make sure you edit the right page.  Antonio Lopez  (desu) 20:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Odd. No idea how I managed that one, guess I wasn't paying attention. Tavy08 (talk) 20:20, 22 October 2008 (UTC)