User talk:Antophil

Image tagging for Image:Natalia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Natalia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Thilakan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thilakan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyrighted material
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Stifle (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Natalia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Natalia.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Venu.jpg listed for deletion == An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Venu.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 04:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC) ==

Image:Venu.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Venu.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 04:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nataliacruze.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nataliacruze.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 04:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nataliacruz.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nataliacruz.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 04:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nataliac.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nataliac.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 04:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Thilak.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Thilak.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 04:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Gopi.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gopi.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 04:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bharath Gopi.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bharath Gopi.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 05:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Geetha.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Geetha.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 05:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Johnabraham.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Johnabraham.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 05:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Antophil! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Geetha -

Non-free rationale for File:Mathilukal.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mathilukal.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sophia Santi


The article Sophia Santi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails pornbio, awards/noms all group scene related, negligible RS biographical content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sophia Santi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophia Santi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sophia Santi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)