User talk:Anu9961shri

October 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Changes you revert
If you think this is looking creative then you are wrong. I've just included the infobox and it is looking great which you just removed it. Leave the infobox there and if you think there are some minor mistakes do the minor edits but leave the infobox as there as it was. Anu9961shri (talk) 12:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * First this article has been nominated for WP:GA. There are rules and policies in wikipedia. You are new here, I can understand. For this article, there is no requirement of such infobox. Secondly, in the infobox only unnecessary infos are added name of stadiums and all. Its in bad taste of the article. By saying "...it is looking great..", it would be seemed as POV, not acceptable. So be cautious before any edit. First read all policies and rules of wikipedia and if you are interested in football related article, then go through WP:FOOTY. Dey subrata (talk) 13:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Whatever you wish, but this look is so ordinary and not up to the mark and yes infobox are added in several support groups of India and in the world. Do check you old age brother.

December 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2019 Ballon d'Or. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)