User talk:Anuanantharaman

Wisden 100
Please do not continue to add your own personal opinions to the Wisden 100 article. Your edits breach WP:NPOV and as such have been reverted. --Jpeeling (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

These are not personal opinions. I compared two innings based on objective criteria to bring out what appear to be some basic flaws in the rating system. Wisden should not be publicizing such a list without responding to the legitimate questions raised. Also, note that these comments have been placed in the "Controversy" section of the article.

Wisden's ratings are fundamentally flawed. They should correct the flaws and re-publish the list. Having such a flawed list on Wikipedia is the problem - not a reader pointing out objective reasons as to why the ratings are incorrect.


 * The list is objective so I can't see why there's even a dicussion. I am reverting your edits and strongly suggest you read WP:NPOV before making any further contribution. --Jpeeling (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)