User talk:Anuar7272/sandbox

Definition part: The definition is quite clear about in basic information. But from my point of view, the usage of the sentence "Unlike commercial software for same purposes" at the end of the paragraph is ambiguous (and probably arbitrary). Because no other commercial software is mentioned here for comparing. I would prefer not to use this kind of word.

Product History: The structure of this part is along the timeline. Wikipedia allows us to do some fancy typesetting. I suggest use timeline symbol of each period instead of putting all the information in a single paragraph. This re-arrangement can help readers crab important information more quickly.

Components: I am not an expert in this part but to my understanding, the description is clear enough. But I would suggest some content about the how the automatic system deals with the two different components. Seems like it will choose either of them.

References:This is reliable source from the official introduction material. But we need at least three reliable sources for wikiproject Ruijiao (talk) 16:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)--Ruijiao (talk) 16:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Ruijiao

Pair Review from "Go" :  Overall, he uses many references which makes his Wikipedia informative. References sources that he used are appropriate. Moreover, the information there is very detailed and structure is great. There may be some improvement from current Wikipedia page he made. He could avoid using hedge such as " might be ", subjective description such as "competitors". He may want to explain more about the relationship between GPS and GAMIT, which makes his Wikipedia more understandable. There are some small grammatical mistakes. ( some single noun should be plural) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoHashimoto (talk • contribs) 16:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)