User talk:Anujasp

Welcome

 * }

Your contributed article, Artificial Intelligence and Genetic engineering


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Artificial Intelligence and Genetic engineering. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Genetic engineering. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Genetic engineering - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 07:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

HI
This was just a demo of using talk pages.Pratik Lahoti (talk) 09:19, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

aηsuмaη  ༽Ϟ  19:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your sandbox review
Hey I went through your sandbox for Software Inspection.Good that you have started but you need to note the following points -
 * Your article does not have a single reference. Please add the references wherever necessary. To learn more, see Wikipedia:Referencing.
 * Make some changes to the lead section. It does not start well.
 * Take care of simple rules like starting a new sentence with an uppercase letter and so on.
 * "Let us now have a brief idea about the two terms "Walk-through" and "technical review".". This sounds more of an essay/speech. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. See other wikipedia articles and the way in which they are written. Make changes to your article accordingly. You have to be careful with your grammar as well.

Get these things done asap and then get back to me on my talk page.

Happy Editing! Pratik  Lahoti  (talk)   05:31, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Your sandbox review v2.0
Hey I went through your recent edits. You have taken care of the points I mentioned last time. But still
 * You need to work on the formatting aspect.
 * You should avoid using "we", "you", etc.
 * The first paragraph of Why Inspection?? was a copyvio from http://www.methodsandtools.com/archive/archive.php?id=29. I've removed it.Please write in your own words.
 * Get the content verified from sir for the technical aspect.

Pratik  Lahoti  (talk)   06:19, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Your edits
Hello! I'm GorillaWarfare, and I've been reviewing your edits that you've been making. I have deleted your two sandbox articles (User:Anujasp/AIsandbox and User:Anujasp/sandbox), as they were both either completely plagiarized or closely paraphrased from other copyrighted sources. This is in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies, and is extremely damaging to the encyclopedia. When you work on articles in the future, you need to be extremely careful to completely summarize source material in your own words, not just copy-and-paste or change a few words here and there. Furthermore, all material needs to be adequately cited with in-text citations. Thank you. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)