User talk:Anune3/sandbox

Peer Reviews
Ana wants to add, "As a result to the struggles of body imaging, many people are diagnosed with Anorexia nervosa. Anorexia nervosa is an eating disorder that results in significant weight loss due to a persons own distorted body image. Its increasing rate shows the correlation between the effects body imaging through social media has on people especially upon women and how it effects the measures of weight loss." after: "However, these figures do not distinguish between people at a low or healthy weight who are in fact overweight, between those whose self-perception as being overweight is incorrect and those whose perception of being overweight is correct. Recent developments, such as the Body Volume Index have addressed this problem in part by measuring weight distribution, but although 3D images of ourselves help to improve body perception, an objective appraisal of our own body image remains a difficult task for us to undertake." 1. This is a neutrality statement 2. I believe this has enough sufficient addition to the wikipedia concerning with body imaging by introducing Anorexia nervosa. 3. There is a citation to the following statement that is being added. 4. The language and tone is understandable to the person additional statement to the article. It also very clear in what Ana what to provide in her following article. 5. There only one edit so far, Ana needs to make two more edits.

Peer Review #2
by: Stasia Ross 1. The edits seem to maintain a neutral tone. They don't seem to be leaning towards one side or another because they don't imply that there are sides. 2. These seem to be sufficient additions to the article. I'm assuming that the first edit will be added to the section of the article that talks about weight. I feel that what you are planning to add will improve this section. 3. The edits have been properly cited and the sources seem to comply with Wikipedia's standards. 4. The tones of the edits seem to be pretty good. The point of the edits are easy to understand and keeps the reader informed. 5. All three edits have been added. Everything seems to be following the guidelines of the assignment and have been cited correctly.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stasiaross (talk • contribs) 18:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)