User talk:Anupamsr/Archived

NOTE: 򪪪�ªෝ࿿�򻮻�»஻󌳌�ೌꪪ򭫚 󿮿󻾭󌫞󮻮� so on... If you can read all the characters please tell me. (I cannot.)

Type whatever you want to here. And I promise to read it.

Welcome and India links
I learnt from your userpage that you have been a Wikipedia since 2002. But did not see any a formal welcome on your page. So here goes,

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanks for your contributions to Varanasi article. Hope you can make it featured! - Ganeshk  ( talk ) 19:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Varanasi
Hi! Saw that you are recently improving Varanasi quite a lot. Just today I was thinking to have a go at the article, with a goal to make it a Featured article. I believe you may be interested. How about a collaboration. You may read WikiProject Indian cities for guidelines. Also see What is a featured article?. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Great! I searched the net for certain sources on the city. there is a lot of info on the district on the nic site . But not much on the city. We'll need some source on the municipality, to start with. (Varanasi Nagar Nigam is the name). Are you from the city? If yes, you may find out some written source. I searcged the ner vaguely. You can continue searching. We'll need stats on demographics, and that can be had from census websites. Most problematic would be "Administration" and "Utility services". Economy may or may not be a problem! Administration informations like number of wards, administration scheme (mayor-in-council or something else) is needed. Polotical info (legislative assembly and lok sabha assembly informations are available - I have checked. Municipality info may be available in some newspaper article as well.
 * Geography and Climate should not pose much problem. History section would be flooded with info, so a daughter article (History of Varanasi) would be needed, so is culture. Have to remove/absorb into other sections sections like tourism and terrorism. Utility service has to highlight problems of the city(there is a lot I guess), including pollution of the Ganges. There are some material in the net I checked. Si we've to start searching the net with strings like "Varanasi ptoblems"," varanasi nagar nigam development" etc. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi. I started "Demographics" section with data on population, sex ratio, literacy rate and crime rate. Have slighly modified Geography beginning. Unfortunately, not much data is available on climate unlike other Indian cities - that may be a problem. You go on increasing "People and culture", but soon it will need major cuts, and copyedits. What about "economy"? Any source? Also, in demographics we need religion data, ethnicities and language. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Uggh! This is frustrating. No readily available web source on the administration of the city! The nagar nigam has minimal presence in the web, ditto for other civic bodies. I do not think this article can be made a FA unless some sources are available. This is bogus, damn.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ahmedabad and Darjeeling got featured article status today. Especially Ahmedabad is an excellent article (there were grammatical issues with Darjeeling). Benaras has to be at par!!--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:24, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

INCOTW
You voted for Bismillah Khan, this week's Indian Colloboration of the Week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 07:10, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Nihilism
Hi! Could you disambg your link to Nihilism on your user page :)--  Anupamsr | talk | contribs  16:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. Done. --Abu Badali 16:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

The Megas
I deleted this under CSD A7 not becuase it does not assert the notability of the subject. Importance is a speedy reason, notability is not. Just thought I would let you know exactly why I deleted this article. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 02:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Moved 1
Hey, what exactly did I do that you take issue with...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:71.192.72.141

Happy Diwali
Hi! A belated Happy Diwali!--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Paul Raj's Citation on Talk:India page
Hi, Please see my latest posting on Paul Raj's citation. Thought you might be interested. Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  21:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: User talk:66.173.152.158

 * Anupamsr wrote: This user has continued the act of vandalism, most recently at Dependent variable, even after your last warning.--æn↓þæµß¶-ŧ-¢ 16:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing that to my attention; since the last warning was over two months ago, I won't take any action now. If they vandalise again, follow the usual procedure (see Wikipedia:Vandalism) – Gurch 17:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

re
Go ahead and make whatever changes you see fit. Baka man  21:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

register
Well, I do already have a username. I'm just not logged in right now, and since people seem angry at my anon account, I do quite think I will stay logged out to deal with these topics (Interwikis on India). --24.251.68.181 23:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Rajput
well, no, I don't accept the revert. There is still no discussion on talk, and the changes to the ToC are clearly sub-standard. the burden on justification is on the user wishing to completely refactor an article. As long as that doesn't happen, reverting to the long-standing version is straightforward. dab (𒁳) 18:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

The Dandelion Girl
I have added a "" template to the article The Dandelion Girl, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. FirefoxMan 19:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Its me
Yup - its me :) How are you doing? You are quite active on Wikipedia - it looks! -Abhask

Aah - I don't think it is the best place to write about it. However, I don't find any better place either ;)

Sorry I meant "plain"
Sorry, I meant "plain" fact. You are right "fact" shouldn't be preceded by a qualifier ... Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  18:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Were you serious or joking? In any case, I've added "Tamil heritage" to make is more informative and precise.   Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  19:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that was my mistake. I guess I need to be more careful with my edit summaries.  Part of the problem is that not every one is as civil as you, and I wasn't sure who I was dealing with.  Many apologies again.  How does the present version of the first paragraph look to you?  Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  21:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

bogus warnings
Please do not place bogus warnings on my talkpage.

Regarding the article it's very silly for anyone to think he was not born in Pakistan.Please forget this fantasy that Pakistan was ever "part" of India.If people can use a country's name before it's name was officially established(ie "anceint Iran" when the name Iran was established in 1935 or "ancient India" when India was created in 1947).

And please refrain from using words like "our encyclopedia".Wikipedia is not your personal property.It is for all users to contribute to.

Thanks.--Nadirali نادرالی
 * Reply:
 * Summary: replying for using Template:test for vandalism (edit warring without discussion).

bogus warnings
I did not vandalize anything, esp re the Frédéric Prinz von Anhalt article; I am adding citations from The New York Times and other publications re the background of Prinz von Anhalt's adoption by Princess Marie Auguste of Anhalt. 204.126.250.110 15:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Lithuanian references by User:82.21.144.216
Hi I didn't tell nothing that is not a truth about meanings of these names of gods and vedas. they sound to me very similar to my language and moreover they have similar meanings in our pantheon of ancient gods. VEDA MEANS NOT KNOWLEDGE BUT THE GUIDE BOOK. This is very strict meaning and even more revealing the purpose of vedas than knowledge. I speak russian, lithuanian french and english and I can compare these languages - THE MOST ANCIENT IS MY NATIVE LITHUANIAN. I even can easily read these vedas in sanscrit. And I think it would be even easier to understant if I could hear that language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.144.216 (talk • contribs)

Is this license compatible?
You asked: "Is this license compatible with Wikipedia?"


 * No. The non-commercial bit renders it inappropriate for the Wikipedia.  The attribution and share-alike parts aren't a problem, though.  --Yamla 16:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for recognition
Thanks for the barnstar, even if it's a little tongue-in-cheek. Sometimes the even the smallest edits can help to prevent the gradual slide into mediocrity. It is my first award in two years of fairly active editing. --Blainster 18:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Re -
Talk:Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar== ==

I looked at the talk page and most of the Indians, who i agree with, said he is not a Pakistani. Pervez Musharraf is not an Indian even though he was born in Delhi, and Manmohan Singh is not a Pakistani. I thought the tag was useles, but if you want to keep it their by all means do so. IP198 21:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

let's not fight
Just wanted to let you knw despite our recent hostilities,I have nothing aginst you in person.I am forced to post evidence now that I'm at arbcom. Though I have strong disagreements with you,I hope we'll be able to discuss the issues in a freindly manner.Accept my apologies. Best regards.--Nadirali نادرالی

Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
Added Tamil pronunciation script to the above page. --Madhu 16:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Greetings
Happy Holi !!--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

blocked
You have been blocked for meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry - please see this ANI report. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 02:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

OIT
I think there are numerous pages in the history of the page which better represent the theory than Dab's whitewashing. Please look through the history to pages around December-January 2006-2007. Like this version had loads of information which was rejected because apparently it was written by authors that don't deserve a mention. But the OIT is a fringe theory and fringe authors are the only ones who have anything good to say about it, so surely their say should be considered in an encyclopaedia. Darrowen (talk) 04:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)