User talk:Anupkc

{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0"
 * style="border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;"|

Your Edits on RSS page
Dear anupkc, you have downloaded pics from the net and uploaded them to wiki. This can have serious copyright issues. Can you please give more information about the pics if you have their licences --Sandeepsp4u (talk) 10:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

anup, They way you are making the edits is claring your intention. You are making the page full of alegation and criticism.. I think an article have of lots of things to say. But you are only engaged in showing criticism.--Sandeepsp4u (talk) 09:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

On your quote from bunch of thoughts the book dosen't contain the statement as you had shown. I request you to please give some other refrence which shows that that statement is there about the threats to nation.--Sandeepsp4u (talk) 09:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for showing the refrence form Britinica --Sandeepsp4u (talk) 09:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I dont know about which edits you are asking about in disucssion section please be clear --Sandeepsp4u (talk) 09:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

About mission section its lookin a POV becuase there is no proper refrence provided for that sentence.--Sandeepsp4u (talk) 09:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

That sections is necessar to prove that the alegation from SFH was wrong. If we will not provide that then it will be biased article.--Sandeepsp4u (talk) 09:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I will request you the same that please do the neccessary discussion before adding to the article if you really want to contribute positively to article--Sandeepsp4u (talk) 09:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

anup i am not misusing the work vandalism. I had gown through the book and all the chapters but i think you must also read it, the chapters are there but after reading it what meening comes out is not what you are mentioning it hear. Now if you will say that this is my personal point of view then i will request you to give some third party refrence on this book to prove your point--Sandeepsp4u (talk) 10:10, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 11:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Your reverts
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. nihar (talk) 12:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. nihar (talk) 12:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

discuss
Thanks for Your support in building the article of RSS with nice refrences and content. --Sandeepsp4u (talk) 09:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I had provided the refrence for the citation which you had asked about Khuswant sings statement. and realtion between FOIL and SFH..Please let me know if you find any problem in this refrences--Sandeepsp4u (talk) 08:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes I agree with you. Let us discuss. But please once read the 3RR rule. nihar (talk) 12:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes but remember you have crossed the 3. nihar (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC).

The refrence which you had given form bitanica doe's contain the sentences which you had written. I would request you to please verify it again and chekc it properly. Until then i am referting it to a stable state--Sandeepsp4u (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Reply:
Hi Anup,

I felt that it was an allegation and that's about it. It has not been established as truth. That way many people are alleged of a lot of misdoing. That stands false until proven otherwise. Shall we use the page to put only the facts that are established as true by credible authorities? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavanpch (talk • contribs) 14:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Role during the 1962 Sino-Indian War
Hi Anup,

I do know that wikipedia offers a lot of room to state truths and facts. However, with your actions of deleting and editing sections, it is rather very easy to understand your intentions.

Prima facie you appear to have differences with RSS. And you are entitled to be so. But, this is not the place where you show such intentions. While I respect your views about this topic, let me also request you, let us refrain from showing our vested interests while editing the topic.

A lot of sections in the page themselves stand as testimony where the criticisms and facts are established even though it meant damage for RSS. But this act of personal interest superseding the facts is totally unacceptable.

Please refrain from editing this way lest you get reported. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavanpch (talk • contribs) 15:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

the RSS volunteers offered their services _ 1965
Hi Anup,

Please use the following link to find out the references about Indo-sino war and RSS contribution to it.

Refer to Page no 243. And hey, I am bringing that reference and the line back.

http://www.amazon.com/Hindu-Nationalist-Movement-India/dp/0231103352/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1250696840&sr=8-4#reader

Regards,

Stop, threatening other contributors -- Anupkc (talk) 15:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, I wonder, do you really think you are contributing?

And yes, dont take it threat.

By the way, did you see the book? Page 243? You may open the book on Amazon Book Reader -> choose See inside the book button. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavanpch (talk • contribs) 16:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 09:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

APPEAL TO YOU Reg: [BRAHMAN PUJAN], [UNIVERSAL PRAYERS]. written by [Naresh Sonee] On wikipedia, These above two pages are far older than the present article [Brahman] References of above titles are also available on New York site - http://www.printsasia.com/BookDetails.aspx?Id=445813482 Meanwhile, Can your good selves in Wiki Project Indian Community re-create a precise pages on [Naresh Sonee] & his book [Brahmand Pujan] – [Brahmaand Pujan]. However, Sonee is the writer of  this  book  [Brahmand Pujan] written in 1999. registered with Government of India- HRRD. Details of the registration is provided here on http://brhmaandpujanbook.tripod.com/. More than sufficient, news and reviews are there on http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ Since 5-6 yrs, for one or the other reason pages of [Naresh Sonee] & [Brahmand Pujan] are faced by communal bias from outside India  so these articles over and again get deleted here in Wikipedia for minor reasons. However, many hits of - Naresh Sonee reflects on google search engine also. So, I request Wiki Indian community to kindly come forward and generously help these two pages to grow, as I am fed up to fight my case alone here [left] and moved out long back. Meanwhile, such an important info/issue on ‘Indian literature’  which adds & spell  ‘new meaning /dimension’  to Brahman -should it stay lost else ignored? Your community panel has to judge at last. Myself, will not be on Wikipedia, for the same i apologise, but- pls. help these two pages to get reinstalled, reap, sow and grow, if you too feel so, I appeal to do this munificent favour. Regards- Dralansun (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC).

naveenpf (talk) 16:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

& (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bot_requests&oldid=481419438#Message_to_take_part_in_Assessment_Drive request] on Bot requests. 01:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  01:06, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Pathachalan.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pathachalan.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)