User talk:Anuragtaya

June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Parihar has been reverted. Your edit here to Parihar was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.jatland.com/home/Henry_Walter_Bellew) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ror, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please note that Raj sources, such as the 1872 one you used, are not considered reliable sources, so should not be used in our articles

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ror, you may be blocked from editing. This is the English Wikipedia, please do not make additions to our articles in Hindi. If you wish to contribute in Hindi please use https://hi.wikipedia.org/ - Arjayay (talk) 09:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Okk I'll take care next time. Anuragtaya (talk) 11:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ror. As already explained above, and in the edit summaries for that article, Raj sources, such as the 1872 one you used, are not considered reliable sources, so should not be used in our articles - Arjayay (talk) 12:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I'll take care next time Anuragtaya (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * You said so before, then continued. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:50, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

 Because you have evaded the block on this account by editing without logging in to the account, the block has been extended to a longer time. JBW (talk) 10:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Fuck off 🖕🏻🖕🏻 Anuragtaya (talk) 02:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)