User talk:Anuran

SLAM
Hi

First of all, thanks for the catch - that was my mistake. I had assessed it as part of the drive to turn ??? unassessed articles into assessed ones. Articles were not assessed by content per se, but rather by volume as the main drive was to correctly assess for stub and start-class rather than importance, and once assessed for class the importance ??? was automatically changed to a low. The intent was that after they were all assigned a class, they would be looked at by editors and assessed for importance and content during the next stage of the drive. Unfortunately that did not happen as quickly as required, and I went through articles to assess importance on the major robotics-topics articles, this seems to be one I missed.

If you are especially interested in robots, perhaps you would consider looking the robotics project over? WikiProject Robotics

It is not a fast moving or extremely active project, but we are in the process of reassessing articles and any help would be appreciated. While I can see that you have put the attention needed flag on in the SLAM talk page, often us non-expert editors have to look things up in text books and papers and fix things ourselves; If you are interested there is a whole category of robotics articles needing work that you may be perfectly suited to helping with :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 15:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Nice catch...
...finding the hoax at human echolocation. Thanks for reverting it! Binksternet (talk) 01:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Lol, fact checking is my thing, although in this case I barely had to do any :P. --Anuran (talk) 02:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)