User talk:Anusut

Orphaned non-free image File:Shantikunj.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Shantikunj.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Shantikunj.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shantikunj.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bhagawati Devi Sharma
Hi, I'm Jrcrin001. Anusut, thanks for creating Bhagawati Devi Sharma!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Categories are important because they link related subjects.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Bhagawati Devi Sharma, Anusut!

Wikipedia editor Jrcrin001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I am assuming good faith in cited references. Additional references may be required to improve this article. See article talk page."

To reply, leave a comment on Jrcrin001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks. Anusut (talk) 00:35, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Bhagawati Devi Sharma, Anusut!

Wikipedia editor Jrcrin001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I am assuming good faith in cited references. Additional references may be required to improve this article. See article talk page."

To reply, leave a comment on Jrcrin001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shailbala Pandya concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shailbala Pandya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shailbala Pandya


Hello Anusut. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Shailbala Pandya".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhagawati Devi Sharma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhagawati Devi Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bhagawati Devi Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 13:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Brahmavarchas Shodh Sansthan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brahmavarchas Shodh Sansthan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brahmavarchas Shodh Sansthan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)