User talk:Anuwater

Welcome

 * }

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Coconut custard, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Coconut custard was changed by Anuwater (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853351 on 2011-10-01T10:48:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
--5 albert square (talk) 23:21, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Loi Krathong, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Loi Krathong. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page. If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.
 * I noticed that you used an edit summary when editing the page Loi Krathong that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner.

September 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Steamed curry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  02:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Steamed curry. DMacks (talk) 07:39, 6 December 2021 (UTC)