User talk:Anyeverybody/Archives/2009/December

Arguing with images in captions
Any-body, a user has posted long captions on the Flight deck and Comparison of armoured to unarmoured flight deck designs articles regarding your image, File:Fd.png. I twice tried to remove his editorial comments from the captions, but finally just remove the images to avoid further edit wars. I've started a discussion at Talk:Comparison of armoured to unarmoured flight deck designs, but I'm not well-versed enough on the subject to argue one way or another. If your're around, you might want to weigh in. Peroanlly, I find that the comparison article is filled with so many contradictions and equivocations as to be practically useless, and it certainly didn't help me understand the isue any better. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 08:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The source cited by the editor trying to make his/her point doesn't say that British carriers could store aircraft overhead in the hangar, it says spare fuselages could though (a fuselage isn't a complete aircraft but the other editor may have misunderstood the difference.) I apologize that I don't have time to comment more but perhaps pointing out the what the source actually says can help clear up the dispute.


 * Here's the source he/she is citing at Google books: Roberts, British Warships of the Second World War Anynobody(?) 21:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)