User talk:Anythingacc

September 2022
Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Wire (India) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Anythingacc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to The Wire (India) does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —  Newslinger  talk   02:48, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm M.Ashraf333. I noticed that you recently removed content from Asim Munir (general) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. He is awaiting Chief of Army Staff as Qamar Javed still in office. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 01:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Hi Anythingacc! I noticed that you recently marked three edit as minor&#32; two at Arfa Khanum Sherwani and one at Rana Ayyub where you added a statement about the subject of the article. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you twice20:46, 4 May 2023 06:05, 5 May 2023 added a comment to the article on Arfa Khanum Sherwani, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think the editors who reverted you may have made a mistake, you can explain yourself on the article talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You dont need any citation for both persons both are leftist its clearly world knows. These are never neutral to any thing. both are most contro journalists Anythingacc (talk) 08:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Smiley.svg If "it's clearly world knows", then there should be no difficulty providing a citation. Please read: Wikipedia:Verifiability. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * https://www.firstpost.com/india/dubious-case-of-rana-ayyub-and-left-liberal-cabal-that-defends-the-indefensible-10397041.html Anythingacc (talk) 21:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:No original research says: "Wikipedia does not publish original thought. All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles must not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves."


 * The newspaper article makes allegations against Rana Ayyub. But the article does not say that she is "left wing".  It has various statements about a "Left clique" or "Left-liberal cabal" defending her conduct.  But there is nothing that directly supports the claim that she is left wing, or that she is part of a left clique or a left-liberal cabal.  There is an organisation called Amnesty International that defends trouble-makers, but being defended by Amnesty International does not make a person part of Amnesty International. -- Toddy1 (talk) 04:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rana Ayyub, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rajasthan Royals, you may be blocked from editing. Unsourced and the group you mention seem to be just investors.  Doug Weller  talk 11:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)


 * No they're owners Anythingacc (talk) 18:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * check there websites you will get it Anythingacc (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I dont put unsourced or poorly sourced. All are facts based Anythingacc (talk) 18:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for three months because of persistent opinionated editing which goes counter to sources, as recently here and here, as well as imperviousness to warnings. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 16:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC).


 * Poor guys fear of getting exposed Anythingacc (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * poor people just loves to do biased posting Lol Anythingacc (talk) 18:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you get paid for lying in wiki? or you just loves someones as so much youall do bias and block others Anythingacc (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * poor People like you cant handle facts and just block someone Lol Anythingacc (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

is closed. Continued personal attacks. Strike one of three. Why user is not indeffed is beyond me. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * What he wrote whole article in biased way so edited according to offically unbiased. Anythingacc (talk) 18:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I attacked on this guy cause i hate biased people who write article or anything biased Anythingacc (talk) 18:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Doug Weller talk 19:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)