User talk:Aokeier

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {&#123;helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!--Tikiwont 19:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Andrew Slattery
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Andrew Slattery, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Andrew Slattery seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Andrew Slattery, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 18:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Kylie Rose requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 07:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Notability asserted, ignore above. VivioFa  teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 10:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Catherine Combe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 10:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Kylie Rose has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- pb30 < talk > 03:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability of The HelioCentury Project
A tag has been placed on The HelioCentury Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Matty - (Talk) 13:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Ungrounded removal of tags at Andrew Slattery
You have repeatedly removed, and  tags from the Andrew Slattery article, which I have repeatedly reinstated. It should be noted that such ungrounded removal of tags may be considered vandalism and could result in an editor's account being blocked. If it is felt that there is a valid reason to remove such tags, then this should be discussed at Talk:Andrew Slattery first. --Yumegusa (talk) 09:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

--Yumegusa (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing.

Andrew Slattery afd
==AfD nomination of Andrew Slattery== An article that you have been involved in editing, Andrew Slattery, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Andrew Slattery. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Yumegusa (talk) 18:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The HelioCentury Project article is flagged for speedy deletion again
A tag has been placed on The HelioCentury Project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

reposting (G4) promotion (G11) of web page/project (A7). Lesser reasons: orphaned sub-stub after clean-up (maybe A3), had Template:Notability since date of creation without response, part of apparent "Andrew Slattery campaign" by user.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Zigger &laquo;&ordm;&raquo; 21:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sun.gif overwrite of PD photo with drawing
I've reverted your overwrite of Image:Sun.gif, which is apparently a public domain photograph from NASA, because the drawing by an unidentified artist seemed like it should be a completely new upload rather than an update, particularly as it would have a different licence. In other words, please use a new name for new images when warned, and specify a licence. -- Zigger &laquo;&ordm;&raquo; 23:04, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sun.gif
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sun.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Harri Jones Memorial Prize for Poetry


The article Harri Jones Memorial Prize for Poetry has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "prize article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged as unreferenced since 2010"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)