User talk:Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused/chooserrvandalism

== chooserr (talk &bull; contribs &bull; [ page moves] &bull; block user &bull; [ block log]) ==

There are only two possible expanations for this troll

 * 1) It is poor parody of a fundamentalist, ie. a strawman
 * 2) A plain old sock, make such bizaire comments, edits, vandalisms, that it makes other users seem less insane by comparison, ie. another User:DavidsCrusader (talk • contribs)--Aolanonawanabe 05:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

NO, this is simply a case of a petty stalking user, Aolanonwaswrong incase you haven't guessed who, can't use the English Language, resorts to name calling almost instantly, nominates pages for AFD without a thought to their content, and thinks that an alternate spelling of Hindu, and Glacière are vandalism. Chooserr 06:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll take my time with this, shock sight with graphic images of photoshopped fetus parts--Aolanonawanabe 06:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * this one's funny, Popups-assisted reversion to revision, and accused it of vandalism--Aolanonawanabe 06:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * ah yes--Aolanonawanabe 06:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * accused anti-vandal bot of being immoral--Aolanonawanabe 06:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * waits for consensus to fall against him, then declares that everyone agrees with him and makes blind reverts--Aolanonawanabe 06:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * creates really strange articles, and then insert stories about how the topic he created offends christians, in this case, "turtle racing"--Aolanonawanabe 06:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * generates massive amounts of edit summary spam, every time it's blocked--Aolanonawanabe 06:38, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * nominates human rights article for deletion--Aolanonawanabe 06:39, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * apparently went on a long anti-curps rant that ended with him compiling a long public list of abusive user names that he says 'wouldn't have happened if he hadn't been blocked by curps
 * User is at best a very bad parody, at worst a vandal--Aolanonawanabe 06:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * and this is just the last week or so, I can't bring myself to look much further back in his edit history--Aolanonawanabe 06:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The site wasn't a shock sight...It showed a picture of a fetus in the womb - happy and carefree - and maybe a picture or two of the blessed virgin, no dead babies unless it linked to them. Oh and as for the anti-vandal bot you know as well as I do that robots don't have moral. Chooserr 06:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Wasn't blind at all, just impatient. I listed the reasons for my revert, and why my version was more effective on both the talk page, and the article for deletion page. One user was reverting to a different version. 1 USER. Also as for the turtle racing article everyone but Calton (who I'm suspecting is your sock or the other way around) voted to keep, some to expand as well telling you that they want to know "MORE" about it. Chooserr 06:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

I used my best judgement in nominating the Gay rights article and when it was voted to keep I stopped. As for spamming you quoted the wrong section - it was made by me - and you ignore the fact that I tried to work around an unfair block for what? Welcoming users, something hundreds of wikipedians do. Chooserr 06:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

No didn't say that at all your skewing the facts, I said I'd use my "this user should be blocked" template on those accounts if I hadn't been blocked. I had no control over the user, and was editing at the same time they were created. Chooserr 06:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

===(source)===


 * templates substituted by a bot as per Template substitution Pegasusbot 07:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)