User talk:Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused/cow wars

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Deckiller 02:46, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

User name
How is your user name pronounced?? Georgia guy 02:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

AD vs CE at the Village Pump
Hi. You recently edited the era formats in Sophocles, so I'm letting you know about a discussion I'm starting at the Village Pump, in case you're interested in helping to find an NPOV solution to this issue. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually all I did was revert chooserrs' edits, after all, in theory, he isn't supposed to edit while he's blocked--Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused 01:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If you're not interested, then I apologize for bothering you. I just notified the six most recent reverting editors from there, as possibly interested parties.  I'm going to remove your reply from the Village Pump page, unless you really want it to be there, as it's not really addressing the proposal. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:44, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Removing content from Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress and Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:42, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * It's not content, it's a troll, why don't you examine its edit history before jumping to conclusions--Aolanonawanabe 17:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It is up to admins to decide what's a troll and what isn't on these two pages. You are free to add your own comments on WP:VIP, but removing content posted by anyone else is vandalism. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:51, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Stop, please. Whatever it is you are doing, thanks : )  ε γκυκλοπαίδεια  *   (talk)  17:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * It's not exactly edit warring you see...I gave the reason too. It's a recent date. Unless you'd like me to put AD before every common 20th century date I suggest you think for once in your life and revert your edits. Thank you, Chooserr 18:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I haven't made any edits to the article, please stop this nonsense--Aolanonawanabe 18:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

re: Chooserr and sockpuppets
Unless there's a confirmation that they are Chooserr, no. Blocks apply to accounts more than people. Anybody can tag something with a sockpuppet tag, but it doesn't automatically qualify for an extension of the block.--Sean|Bla ck 18:53, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * One of them was blocked indefinatly as a sockpuppet of chooserr, immediatly afterwards, two anon IPs come along and make the same edit, with the same edit summary, to the same article--Aolanonawanabe 18:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Eras, a comment
Wikipedia_talk:Eras

Are you selling tickets and popcorn as well? This is great stuff! I stopped trying to comment- it is more fun to just watch. Thank you for bringing some laughter to the debate. I think at least some of us 'get it', anyway. :) →  P . Mac Uidhir  (t)  (c)  20:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks ?
Well I guess this is the first time you've ever actually helped me out...so thanks. Chooserr 05:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Othro Evra
Added 2 new links - this won't count as a revert. Chooserr 06:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It should count as vandalism, links do not automatically = source--Aolanonawanabe 06:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

I have (or will shortly) reverted your edit to the condoms page. This diagram explains some health risks. Chooserr 08:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Aolanonwannabe Fetal Pain
Why might I ask have you removed a perfectly good link, dedicated to informing people about fetal pain? And why exactly do you find it "creepy"? Chooserr 01:38, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Uploaded file
May I ask what article will use that image? --HappyCamper 02:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It was already in John_E._Jones_III, until somebody replaced the image with something else--Aolanonawanabe 02:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * [[Image:WikiThanks.png]] Ah hah! I see. Good catch! I'll take care of removing that vandalism image then. --HappyCamper 02:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop reverting without discussion on WP:AN/I. This is disruptive editing. Your complaint probably belongs in other channels, like WP:RFC or the mailing list. --Ryan Delaney talk 06:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Cow warring
Wow, what do you know you who exchanged the last blow is the first to say that he hasn't done anything wrong...crazy world we live in ain't it? Chooserr 07:28, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * mindless incoherent troll, do you want me to make it into a template for you?--Aolanonawanabe 07:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Aolanaonwaswronglyaccused, could you please try to adhere to our policy of No Personal Attacks. I don't think that Chooserr goes about things very wisely on Wikipedia, but you seem to spend your time following him around, reverting him when it's not necessary (with insulting edit summaries), putting stubs he has created up for deletion, and sending harassing messages. He has a strong POV, and sometimes inserts that into articles, but you're not helping the situation at all with your remarks about "mindless trolls". AnnH (talk) 08:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I reverted vandalism to an article about cow tipping, he therefore starts a content war about said article (cow tipping), that is both mindless and trolling, unless his "strong POV" applies to cows as well--Aolanonawanabe 08:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't see how this could be classified as "starting a content war". It was a simple, harmless, though unnecessary, edit. The sentence is grammatically correct without the brackets, and he removed them with a perfectly appropriate edit summary – "Got rid of brackets which were unnecessary". The sentence is also grammatically correct with the brackets, but you could have put them back in a much less offensive way than with this edit summary. I agree that his next edit summary is not exactly a model of Wikiquette, but it does seem that the first insult and the last one came from you. AnnH (talk) 08:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Have you by any chance observed what happened just before he decided to follow me to the article about cows? As a frame of reference, this would be after he created a personal attack template and added it to an article, but before he decided he was passionate about cows--Aolanonawanabe 08:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No, I haven't observed it. I've observed harassing and insulting messages from you to him for some time (as I have his talk page on my watchlist, and have just added yours). I will just mention that people with very strong POVs can learn to understand Wikipedia NPOV if they're not harassed and hounded and sneered at and insulted. Two of the finest Wikipedians I know are every bit as pro-life as Chooserr. If you think his behaviour is problematic, it's not a solution to make your own behaviour open to criticism. I think it would be healthier to find another interest on Wikipedia. Cheers. AnnH (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * You mean something less controversial than cows? I'll get right on that--Aolanonawanabe 09:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)