User talk:Apaleja

Welcome!

 * }

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Francesco Vitali has been reverted. Your edit here to Francesco Vitali was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Francesco-Vitali/257875787560/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

RE: Deletion of Apaleja
Hello there, I stumbled upon your question on one of my peer's talk pages here. I figured I'd weigh in and explain, because I'm sure you'd like an answer.

On Wikipedia, a page's eligibility for having an article is affected by the subject's notability. While I'm sure the subject of your article is groundbreaking, unique and exciting, one has to remember that there are a lot of groundbreaking, unique and exciting things happening every day. The way we develop Wikipedia articles is through citing third-party reliable sources that are unbiased to the subject matter.

So, for example, a press release by Company A does not make the company notable. But, on the other hand, if said company has 4 or 5 substantial mentions in local or international media - in a newspaper, on a notable website, etc. - then an article can be put forward.

Now, that's not to say the only issue is notability. Your article must also be written from a neutral point-of-view, must offer knowledge, not advertising, and it must be well-referenced. However, if you believe you've got all the things necessary, please feel free to drop me a note on my talk page or e-mail me and we can go from there!

Cheers, m.o.p  01:48, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the response!
 * While that's quite the list of sources, it also helps if they're in the encyclopedia's native tongue - in this case, English - and if they're more than blog posts. You might find tools like Google News to be useful; I can't turn up much for 48GoGreen, but if you take a look around and find some reliable sources there, that would be great!
 * Cheers, m.o.p  08:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)