User talk:Apalosekoko

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 09:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

unblock-spamun
In reply to your question, have a look at Spam. Also, you forgot to tell us what you want to edit. PhilKnight (talk) 19:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

I wanted to add a missing silent letter in Spanish and a few examples. I took for granted that my link was to be deleted but all the info I wrote is gone. Blancaquinteropuntocom (talk) 23:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * How will you edit in that area without mentioning your website? 331dot (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure if I understood. Sure, I can write without linking any website. Not me, nor any other. No problem with that. However, sometimes links are needed to explain some info that is important to understand that we're talking about (Wikipedia does really good here). So what if I need to clarify something that doesn't exist in Wikipedia yet (so I can't link to Wikipedia)? Should I always avoid links out of Wikipedia? Thanks Apalosekoko (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I think you have missed the point here. Nobody is saying don't link to outside sites. In fact, that's exactly how Wikipedia should be written, but using only reliable sources as described at WP:RS. What you're being asked is how you intend to edit without using or referring to your own website. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

That link made it a clearer.

So, only published documents, right? No links to any post unless they're from a University or a reputable organization.

When I see missing information I'll add it without referring to any website, unless of course, I know a reputable source. Then, I'll refer to it.

I only have one question.

For example, a friend was in a very little town in Africa where they had their own language, traditions, etc.. If she wanted to add some information on Wikipedia, would it be better to just write whatever (without you knowing if it's an invention) without a link than to refer to the blog his boyfriend has?

I really want to understand how it works.

Thanks Apalosekoko (talk) 17:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * "When I see missing information I'll add it without referring to any website": No, you won't add it at all.
 * "If she wanted to add some information on Wikipedia, would it be better to just write whatever (without you knowing if it's an invention) without a link than to refer to the blog his boyfriend has?": No, she should not write anything at all. Information added to Wikipedia must be verifiable by readers (see WP:V) using reliable sources. Without that requirement, anybody could write anything they please. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Ok, now I understand. Thank you for being clear. I thought it was ok to write without any references but referencing all I write would take a lot of extra time so I don't think I have anything to contribute with.

Thanks for your patience. I'll delete my account.

May you have a good day! Apalosekoko (talk) 20:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

renaming
Please choose a user name that represents you as an individual and not a function of your company. Thanks. -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 20:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Apalosekoko Blancaquinteropuntocom (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC) globally renamed Blancaquinteropuntocom to Apalosekoko -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 03:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)