User talk:Apeanof

Welcome!
Hello, Apeanof, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bilderberg Group have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 16:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bilderberg Group has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bilderberg Group was changed by Apeanof (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953643 on 2016-11-28T14:18:30+00:00.

Your recent editing history at Bilderberg Group shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Your addition may be correct, but you must give us a source that meets our reliable source criteria saying that's the location of the headquarters. I linked the page on sources, so you'll know what to look for. Please do not add the information back without that source. You are edit-warring right now, and we've got a policy called WP:3RR that limits the number of times you can continue to add the information to an article when others revert or remove your edit. That limit is 3 times in a 24 hour period, and you're right at that limit. Please use the article talk page (click on talk at the top of the page, and edit that page) and discuss the change and possible sources. Thank you.'' Ravensfire ( talk ) 20:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bilderberg Group. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''Just putting the same edit back each time it is reverted will not work. All that will happen is you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please use the articles talk page to discuss this with other editors and provide a WP:reliable source that backs up your claim. As others have said, it may be correct but we need a reference to confirm that. That being said, the first line of the article is not the appropriate place for it. The organizational structure section would probably be a better place if you can provide a reference.'' noq (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. noq (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Apeanof, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bilderberg Group. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Bilderberg Group. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  08:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)