User talk:Apexff

Please
Add no content without sources, and if possible, use the {{cite book..., {{cite news..., {{cite AV..., {{cite web..., {{cite journal..., etc. templates, filling them in fully (including author, date, title, url, and access date, at least, and adding isbn, location, and publisher for books and more obscure articles). Point is to do a little well, not a lot that creates hours of work for others to remediate. Consider it "wasted time avoidance"—yours that is—as no follow-on editor is going to keep your prose, if it cannot be readily verified. And the path to ready verification is (a) a citation for every fact appearing, and (b) complete citations that can quickly be pulled up for the verifications. Bonne chance. [An educator] 2601:246:C700:19D:E443:4C25:B2A0:E36 (talk) 08:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ann Voskamp for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ann Voskamp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ann Voskamp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 17:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)