User talk:Aphisherofmen

Hello, Aphisherofmen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! LyrlTalk C 22:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC) LyrlTalk C 22:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bc-airial.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bc-airial.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Edits to Condom
I noticed you have added an external link to the condom page, with the explanation that you had "Added opposing view point link". The article is quite upfront that condoms are not 100% effective even when used perfectly (and that many people do not use them perfectly), nowhere in the article is claimed that condoms are the "solution" to any of society's problems, and none of the current external links are to sites that argue "condoms will solve aids" - I'm confused as to what your link is supposed to be a counterpoint to.

I also removed your commentary on programs that promote condoms as a tool for reducing the spread of sexually transmitted infections from the "causes of failure" section. That section is addressing the failure of the condom itself as a sperm and/or disease barrier. Your discussion was talking about the failure of the programs, not of the condom itself. I believe this type of commentary works better in the section "role in sex education", which is devoted to discussing programs in which condoms feature prominently. I would be happy to discuss how to address your concerns with the condom article either on my talk page, or at Talk:Condom. LyrlTalk C 22:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.


 * Just as a comment to your recent edits, consider that "The rate of HIV transmission with sexual intercourse is much lower than with other sexually transmitted diseases-approximately 0.3% per sexual contact with an HIV-infected person." (from here). If an HIV-discordant couple had condom-free intercourse every day of the woman's menstrual cycle, the risk of the HIV-negative partner contracting the disease would be about 10%.  By contrast, the average couple having random condom-free intercourse 2-3 times per week has a 20-25% chance of pregnancy per menstrual cycle - correctly timed intercourse may increase this figure to 60-80% (see Fertility awareness).  It is simply false to argue that the risk of HIV transmission from condom failure (or failure to use condoms) is higher than the risk of pregnancy. LyrlTalk C 22:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Blogs
Please note: the Wikipedia guidelines on external links don't approve of links to blogs by non-recognized authorities. (Moreover, if that is your own blog, there is double the reason to omit it as a conflict of interest.) Thus, I have deleted the blog links that you added. Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 21:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Iron Dragon.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Iron Dragon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 14:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mvjs (talk) 06:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is
An article that you have been involved in editing, That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 14:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — MATRIX! (a good person!)&#91;citation unneeded&#93; 21:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)