User talk:Apocmonk

The reason for the revert has to do with the content: The first strike with the article is the fact that it is not properly formatted, the second strike is that the article was redirected to a spot where the discussion on the virus is currently located (recreating a redirected article is usually frowned upon enless you have established a need to do so), and the third strike is that the article in its current form reads like a hoax. You do have sources, but the fact the page has outrages claims and dates means that it will either end up as a redirect or it will be deleted. Being as how I believe in fairness I will allow you 24 hours, begin from the date on my time stamp, to attempt to improve the article, but if nothing changes between now and then I will list the article at AFD and the community will decide what happens to it. (Indedentally, this is all material you can read about in the message orginally left for you.) TomStar81 (Talk) 06:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)