User talk:Apoel4

Esteghlal F.C.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Esteghlal F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shahin (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * What does it matter to you? Do you own Wikipedia? Wikipedia belongs to everyone Apoel4 (talk) 10:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Avoid resources added after the edit war Apoel4 (talk) 10:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Esteghlal F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Shahin (talk) 11:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * what's your problem ? Why do you delete and manipulate all the contents?
 * I report to the managers Apoel4 (talk) 13:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Esteghlal F.C.. Shahin (talk) 13:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Why are you deleting my edits? Where is the problem with my edits?
 * You are not a neutral user Apoel4 (talk) 14:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * What is the problem with my content? Apoel4 (talk) 14:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Explain to me why you delete my content? Apoel4 (talk) 14:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

vandalism
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Persepolis F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shahin (talk) 16:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Your edits have no documentation because you are without logic Apoel4 (talk) 16:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Persepolis F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Shahin (talk) 16:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Where is the source of the talk of the Asian Football Confederation?
 * Why do you publish false content? Apoel4 (talk) 16:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Persepolis F.C.. Shahin (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I will stop false content Apoel4 (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Why do you publish false content? Apoel4 (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Shahin (talk) 16:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

why?

 * Another administrator will be along to review your request. In the meantime, I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:3RR and WP:DR. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * As I assume you know, I blocked this user on May 5 for week for disruption. We are now two days after expiration of that block, and the user is continuing to be a disruption. Plus, it's obvious they have no insight into their behavior. I've never seen so many sections called "why?". I would have indefinitely blocked the user.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I have no objection if you would like to extend the block to indefinite. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * My first instinct is to wait to see what happens, but I won't oppose if you (Bbb23) decide to extend it. But in this case, I suspect extending it will lead to the appearance of being too harsh when disruption after a 1-week block expires would result in a lot less disagreement.  That might make waiting worth it. Floquenbeam (talk) 17:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC) too slow. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)