User talk:Apparition11

Concern Regarding Reverted Edits
I am writing to address a recent edit revert that occurred on the Dashavatara, Dharma andISKCON Temple, Delhi where I noticed that you claimed our links to be spam and blog.

Our website is legally registered as a devotional news website, and we take pride in ensuring that all our posts are sourced from reputable sources and supported by thorough research. Therefore, I believe there may have been a misunderstanding or oversight in the revert.

Could you please review the content again and consider reinstating the original description? This adjustment would accurately reflect the nature of our website and its purpose.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Apparition11 I look forward to your response and clarification. Amitkumar8055 (talk) 13:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Blogs are not reliable sources or appropriate external links. Additionally, you have a conflict of interest in regards to the site and, therefore, should not be adding the link yourself. Also, since you have been indefinitely blocked under User:Amitahujapk, you are evading your block with a sockpuppet, which is obviouly not allowed here. Apparition11 Talk/ Contribs 13:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. I understand the points you've raised and would like to address them accordingly.
 * Regarding the categorization of our website as a "devotional news website," it accurately reflects the nature of our content and our legal registration. We strive to ensure that all posts are meticulously sourced and researched from credible sources.
 * Regarding your points:
 * Reliability of Blogs as Sources: While I understand that blogs are generally not considered reliable sources for certain types of content, our website conforms to rigorous standards of journalistic integrity and factual accuracy in the context of devotional news.
 * Conflict of Interest: I assure you that any edits or additions I make are aimed solely at improving the accuracy and completeness of information on relevant pages. If you have concerns about conflict of interest, I am open to discussing how best to address them.
 * Sockpuppet Allegation: I would like to clarify that I am not evading any block. I am a distinct user from the one you mentioned and operate under a different account legitimately. If there are specific concerns about user behavior, I would appreciate further details to address them effectively.
 * I am committed to upholding the integrity of Wikipedia and its guidelines. Please let me know if there are specific steps or actions you would like me to take to resolve these issues. Amitkumar8055 (talk) 13:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not going to have a conversation with ChatGPT. Apparition11 Talk/ Contribs 14:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It seems that you may not have encountered someone challenging your actions before. I perceive that there might be a disparity in knowledge and the exercise of authority in this instance. Rather than escalate this matter to Wikipedia administrators, I am respectfully seeking your guidance. Given your expertise, I kindly request your suggestions on the most appropriate course of action or any modifications necessary to proceed with posting the links. I appreciate your consideration and understanding in this matter, as it is important for us to communicate effectively. Thank you for your time and attention. Amitkumar8055 (talk) 14:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * My suggestion is to stop spamming your link. Feel free to escalate to administrators. Now, again, I am not going to discuss with ChatGPT about how to spam your site, so kindly stay off my talk page. If you are unable to contribute in English, then perhaps the Wikipedia based in your own language would be a better fit than the English one... Apparition11 Talk/ Contribs 14:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I would like to clarify that my intention is not to spam, but to contribute valuable content to the Wikipedia community. I apologize if my previous actions were perceived otherwise.I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and ensuring that my contributions are appropriate and beneficial to the platform. I would greatly appreciate your guidance on how to make suitable modifications to my edits to comply with these standards. If you have concerns about my proficiency in English, please be assured its better than yours, since i don't have to blame chatgpt that I am capable of contributing effectively in this language. My goal is to enhance the quality of the content, and I am willing to make any necessary adjustments to achieve this.Amitkumar8055 (talk) 14:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * GPTZero gives "100% Probability AI generated". Now, for the final time, STAY OFF MY TALK PAGE. If your proficiency in English in so much better than mine, you should not have any problem understanding that. Apparition11 Talk/ Contribs 14:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I find it amusing that you're scrutinizing grammar using software. Let's not get too worked up about it. I'm logging off now and won't be engaging further. Amitkumar8055 (talk) 14:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)