User talk:Apparition11/Archive1/2018

Happy New Year 2018!
 Happy New Year! Apparition11,

Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 08:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Also, look at my talk page archive table! Darn! Another so close to 200, yet so far. But it's right up there with the other three. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 08:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Happy (late) New Year to you! Good luck reaching the big 2-0-0 in 2018 :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 21:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Removed my links.
Hey Apparition 11,

I hope you are having great day on your end. I have received below email from you. I appreciate you reached back to me.I am very new to Wikipedia.

"I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Tarsar Lake have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page,

First of all I did post some links on wikipedia not only for business point of view but also for readers to find more info on the given topics which were written on the wikipedia.

Lets take one page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes_Trek

Please open the below link and you can find the lot of information on Great Lakes trek in kashmir which you will be unable to find anywhere else on the web. "Wikipedia only has around 150 words about this topic and my website has around 5000 words on this topic. Why is it inappropriate link if it is inappropriate and then other business owner links so be also fall in the same pattern. I really hope you would help me out with this.



You have dead link on it and I had posted link which redirects readers to my website, which speaks about Kashmir Great Lakes trek and the content on my website is more informative then wikipedia and same time I see lot of other business links on the same topics. I feel bit upset that dead link can be on the wikipedia and legit link gets removed. I have very humble question why other business links are okay on wikipedia and not mine.

I hope you can redo my links.

Thanks in advance and I appreciate your time and work you have put in it.

Nazir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazirpeer (talk • contribs) 21:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * . Hello Nazirpeer. The article could definitely use some expansion sourced to reliable, third party sources. Dead links can be repaired, so that alone is not really a reason to get rid of them. If external links violate WP:ELNO or sources are not what Wikipedia call reliable, then they should be removed. Unfortunately, often, they do get missed and make it into articles. Although there are a number of editors who try their best to keep these links out, it is impossible to catch them all. A very large portion of my edits are removing links to travel agencies and travel packages as they are constantly being added. If you see any of these inappropriate links, you are more than welcome to help out and remove them. Thanks. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey Apparition 11,

Thank you for your response. Well regarding dead links but you never even tried to remove it and it does say it is dead link. Second thing about the travel agencies well I only post the links where other travel companies have post links why I only was banned not them. Please check all the links which you have removed of my website and you will be surprise that most of the links which are as ref links are 99% are of travel companies second I found out that one company which uses our website content can have link here and not me.

"The article could definitely use some expansion sourced to reliable, third party sources". I agree 100% and I want you to understand one single point it is our group which discovered Kashmir Great Lakes Trek back in 1970s and other sources can stay on this website and not us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazirpeer (talk • contribs) 23:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

I hope you understand my argument and which is based on facts rest you are admin and you have every right to do what is in your hands. Cheers I hope you have great day ahead. Nazir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazirpeer (talk • contribs) 23:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I did not try to remove the dead link as there is no obvious reason to remove it. It can be repaired, see WP:DEADLINK. The dead link tag is to mark links that are dead so they can be repaired, not removed. Again, you are more than welcome to remove any inappropriate links that you find. There are many inappropriate links on Wikipedia that need to be removed. Unfortunately, the constant addition of links can often be too much for editors to keep up with. I'm not an WP:ADMIN, just an editor (admins do not decide on content). You were not WP:BANNED, you are still free to edit constructively. Is your only purpose here to add links to your site? I ask, because it seems that all of your article edits have been to add the links. If you want to help Wikipedia by constructively editing articles, then I am more than happy to try to help out however I can. If adding those links is your only objective however... Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey Apparition 11,

Thank you for your response. I know you have not removed any dead links. Well I am not here to user hyper links but I should also add some content which you have rightly said and I was thinking adding some content to some of pages which have very little content. I would do it when I am back in India. "inappropriate links" I wouldn't remove any links because everyone has its own reason to be here. Is your only purpose here to add links to your site? I have done it and I wouldn't say No but I do humble request to you to redo my links because each and every link is informative. I promise I will be happy to contrubitue some content on this website in future. I do have lot of pictures which I can contribute here about trekking in Kashmir. I would start writing article about Trekking in Kashmir soon. Kind regards Nazir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazirpeer (talk • contribs) 01:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Adding images that you have taken and adding content to articles is great and much appreciated! If you don't want to remove links, that is perfectly fine. It is a volunteer project after all :) I was just suggesting that because you seemed to be adamant about the fact they were there. Obviously, if inappropriate links exist, that is a reason to remove them, not a reason to add more. If a link does not satisfy WP:EL or WP:RS (depending on the way the link is used), regardless of the reason it was added, it is not appropriate for the article. The links you added do not satisfy WP:ELNO and should not be included articles. I (along with other editors) remove the same type of links daily. You are welcome to ask for more opinions on the article talk page or I guess WP:ELN since you added to over 10 articles. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 01:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey Apparition 11,

Thank you for your response.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsar_Lake References : Total links nine : 5 are from Travel companies and some are dead links and I put informative link yet you removed because polices of wikipedia doesn't allow scams I have humble question haven't you seen all these 5 travel companies on the said page when you removed mine ? .

I can come up with the entire list. volunteer projectBold text Rightly said by you but what about other 5 travel companies links what are they doing here and same time most of links are not even informative and some of links in them are broken links. I am here not to get links on wikipedia but to get justification why were my links were removed when similar and bad links can stay on this website. It is not question about getting back links any more but morality which I stand for.

The time I have written to you with respect and trying to make you understand but yet you seem to ignore my understanding and value my time. I hope you understand what I mean I not volunteer but I run largest trekking company not only in Kashmir but in France too. My company discovers Kashmir Great Lakes trek and you remove the link from wikipedia and keep the dead link. I have one last question please show me one website on internet which speaks about trekking in kashmir, Trek routes and have content way my website has ? 1 single website ?. I have always given right informative link towards my website which is very useful for readers to get over view of places and routes in Kashmir.

I do hope this time around you understand my point of view Kind regards Nazir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazirpeer (talk • contribs) 02:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Your links were removed because they violate WP:ELNO. Per WP:OTHERSPAMEXISTS, "The inclusion of a spam link should not be construed as an endorsement of the spam link, nor should it be taken as a reason or excuse to include another." If you want to remove the links, that is fine. If you don't, that's also fine. Somebody will get around to it eventually. Again, there is nothing wrong with the dead link. I am not going to find a site about trekking in Kashmir, because even if yours is the only one in existence, it still violates WP:ELNO. Being the only one does not make it appropriate. Although, if there are articles that are not covered by reliable sources, those articles should likely be deleted (but that's another discussion). I have tried my best not to be blunt, but, up to this point, adding links to a commercial site that you run to multiple articles is a textbook example of WP:SPAM. If you need help with Wikipedia with anything other than spamming your site, I would be glad to help, but as long as your only interest is adding a link to a site that you run (WP:COI), I am not going to spend any more time on this. You can ask for opinions on article pages or WP:ELN. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 03:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey Apparition 11,

Thank you for your response. I know where your words are coming from it seems racism to me because you are not willing to take any link down because I dont want to take them down. I am not here to find out which link is good or bad but as you have proven my links are scams so are others ? I have give list and marked even articles for you but you don't seem to take any action. I have seen racism at peak in our country these days and you are right example for that. Good luck for it. Thanks and have a great day ahead. Nazir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazirpeer (talk • contribs) 03:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, I wasn't planning on responding, but I failed to foresee a response as asinine as that. Wow... racism because I removed your spam? I removed spam, pure and simple, race having no bearing on it. One of the many articles you spammed was Houseboat. Here I am removing a link to an Amsterdam site. Here, German. Here, I think it's European with offices in the USA. Here, 2 links, 1 Indian and 1 Canadian. Now, since you are stooping to crying racism because you were not permitted to use a charitable organization for free advertising, stay away of my talk page. You can discuss at the places I directed you to previously, but do not comment further here. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 03:41, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Another asinine racism comment

(Parvati Kuteer (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2018 (UTC))Hey! Mistaken delete of my contribution.
Namaste! Hope you doing well. Hey, I am a native of Kasol, Parvati Valley, himachal Pradesh. I had added which I believed to be vital information about trek's around kasol ( which is a traveller's base camp ).

also I am planning to add good info on every detination in kasol. ( like treks and trails ) please see to it.

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parvati Kuteer (talk • contribs) 11:43, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello. There are a few problems with the content that you added. First is that it is not neutral. It sounds like we are advertising these treks. This is not surprising because it is copyright violation of the source, which is not a reliable, published, third party source and is in fact, selling accommodations. Adding content is very much appreciated, but you do need to use better sources, not copy and paste from copyrighted content, and keep the content neutral and encyclopedic. Thanks. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 11:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

About article title
I want to create the page about this person "Pavan Kumar NR" but it showed that administrator create only. So can you solve this issue? 2405:204:5413:2D5D:0:0:13EB:B8A5 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * According to the log at Pavan Kumar NR, it was create protected indefinitely due to sockpuppets with conflict of interest issues. If you want to create this, you'll want to contact an administrator and explain to them how you can create this page properly with reliable sources, without conflict of interest issues, etc. I recommend since they're the ones who protected it, and they can walk you through how it should be created. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 14:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * This is yet another sock in the huge sock farm, most recent unblock request was declined less than a couple of months back due to continued promo socking, and now, we can add this one to the list. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, as always, for your concise and helpful explanation. Thanks for informing me about that. I just figured this was a one-off edit, I'll try to help keep a look out for this. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Removing cover letter URL + text
Hi!

Thanks for letting me know you removed the URL from www.excellentletter.ca from the Wikipedia Cover-letter page. I am also missing a piece of text I added. Because of that I wanted to add the website as a source but don't know how to do that in a way that is sustainable. Could you please help me with that?

The text that I am missing / was removed: 

Thanks,

Rudy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Excellentletter (talk • contribs) 11:02 pm, Today (UTC−5)
 * Hello. I'm sorry, because I doubt this is the answer you were looking for, but the website does not satisfy our external links or reliable source guidelines. Therefore, the link isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. Additionally, if you are affiliated with the site, you should consider reading WP:COI. The text was copied directly from the site, so that constituted a copyright violation and also had to be removed. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

ROYAL RAJPUTS CASTES
The Takuli's are the royal Rajputs of kiccha district of Udham Singh nagar (Uttrakhand).Basically they are very rich by so many years they are also called NAMBARDARS in UTTRAKHAND by many years. THE TAKULI'S and few other CASTES like JOSHI. NEGI. BISHT. RAWAT are all known as ROYAL RAJPUTS because they still have too much money. In older times all the people of Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir were afraid of these 5 castes because they have too much money power as they control all the government officers of Uttrakhand. Now a days all 5 castes majority donates there income to all the needy people's of uttrakhand and help the government to maintain the state uttrakhand ( DEV BHOOMI). good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.202.4.155 (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Um, you need reliable sources and a lot of copy editing for that to be appropriate for an article. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Wiki page
Hello what are point for create Company wiki page

help me my frd — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.131.123.10 (talk) 11:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello. For a company to have an article, it needs to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORP. You may want to read WP:1ST for a decent guide to writing your first article. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

ONIX AUDIO
Further to my update and your subsequent removal.

I must admit I was a little confused with who posted what I now see that it is you .. I apologize

The IP issue is constantly being confused and although I agree WiKI is not a format for advertising .. It must be mentioned as relevant.

If you think it a form or promotion you are not right .. it is a form of update to relevant times.

If you feel inclined to re write it by all means do .. but it really must be added in some way.

Regards

James — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.109.129.37 (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have quite a bit of Wikipedia experience time wise and article wise; however, that article is as poor of quality as I have seen. The article as a whole is a mess, these edits are just making it worse. The IP section you added is poorly sourced/unsourced. You need reliable, third party sources. Quotes like "ONIX GB still have the same design ethos for all of its products, working with obsolescence removed from the equation of design ." and "ONIX DNA carried on with these traditions believing that there is no substitute for time in creating perfection ." are not encyclopedic and promotional. Content needs to be reliable sourced and NPOV. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 11:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

James you clearly do not have sufficient knowledge of the relevance to this company of IP rights and its history to it ... I suggest you search other IP rights postings in other articles before you attack this one.

The world has changed and IP rights from virtually every company are compromised and mentioning the fights that companies have with them is both relevant and valid .. and is not promotional .. In fact I was sold false product and fake product from others using this companies name .. so please tell me how that is promotional and not factual — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.109.129.37 (talk) 23:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Why don't you take the time to read this ... https://www.ipo.gov.uk/t-challenge-decision-results/o49714.pdf .. note the source — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.109.129.37 (talk) 23:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * My name is not James. You do not seem to understand how Wikipedia works. We need published, third party sources with a history of fact checking. What you posted there is a primary source. I posted direct quotes of promotion. If you do not believe they are promotional, then Wikipedia may not be the best place for your writing style. The entire article reads more like a company about us page than an encyclopedia article. Are you affiliated with Onix? If so, you should not be editing the article directly due to a conflict of interest. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 05:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

No heading
--Good Faith?-- Dude, I wish you could put your hand on your chest and ask yourself are you doing the right stuff. Thanks 1.9.223.122 (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * May I ask what you are talking about? I don't see where we have interacted. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 16:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm going to chalk this up to trolling. After having a look and seeing no interactions, I was about to revert them when you replied. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 16:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd say you're right. I thought about just reverting, too, but I have to admit, I enjoy trolls way more than I should :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 16:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your Dislike of My Addition to Step and Repeat
Do please tell me in what way what I added is ANY way different to the other 4 references on there?? I would be exceptionally interested to find out what your reasoning is for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueclive123 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Probably because they didn't get noticed. A lot of people try to take advantage of Wikipedia and use it for advertising. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's volunteers can not catch them all. Obviously, if there are poor sources, adding more poor sources is not an improvement. Removing the poor ones would be a much better solution (finding good ones even better). Your link did not even support the content that it was supposed to source. This makes it appear that you are more interested in including that link than improving Wikipedia. I'll look into the other links later, but poor links is not an excuse to include more poor links. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:02, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Understood, so perhaps there may be something I can do to make the content applicable, please explain what you would like to see. I only posted the link because of the other links being pretty much like mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueclive123 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Indeed there is, and it would be greatly appreciated. Content needs to be backed up by third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. These would include University-level textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, mainstream newspapers, etc., whether they be online or offline. If you can provide reliable sources, I'm sure nobody would object to the content. I still haven't had a chance to really go through the article, but I'm sure that it could really use some. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 21:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * So I wonder now if you have a vested interest in one of the 4 other businesses that were allowed, by you, to keep a similar style of information linked. I thought Wikipedia was a keen proponent of net neutrality however it seems to me that your involvement means that the results are skewed and your stated interest in the eradication of "spam" is not the priority. I feel that you have singled my entry out unfairly and believe I should complain because self appointed people like yourself should be subject to some form redress where necessary and not be able to act unfairly as you have done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueclive123 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * So you believe that my nearly 54,000 edits over the past 11 years has been to cover up keeping those links? I have made 3 edits to that page, all removing spam. I did not add nor have I ever advocated for keeping any of those links. Not removing =/= endorsing or allowing. If you want to help Wikipedia, there is nothing stopping you from removing spam yourself. If you are not here to help Wikipedia, please don't waste my time. Feel free to complain all you want, but if you have no desire to do anything other than spam your link, I will not be spending any more time on this. I plan on looking into it sometime, but a quick glance of my contributions will show that I have very little time to edit right now. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 21:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, naturally I did not think that your raison d'etre was to keep those links.I do understand that what you do is of benefit to Wikipedia users who want a phenomenal resource. All I did was see the existing links and believed mine to be similar, hence my dissatisfaction at being taken down whilst the others remain. Nothing more. I will look to produce some better content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueclive123 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

DST now over
DST ended at 2:00 AM and we fell back and repeated the 1:00 AM hour at that time. Remember your manual clocks. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 16:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated, old friend. I will always hate time change... Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:16, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

No heading
Hello Apparition11, This is Yppup0917 and I wanted to talk to you about K.C. Singh Baba. I know Wikipedia is not a source for advertisements, but the reason why I wrote 'Raja' was because he is the 'Titular King' of Kumaon. Many Wikipedia sights like of Raja Virbhadra Singh and many more sights have the word 'Raja'. They are not the ruling Kings but it is just a form of showing respect and so they are called 'Raja' and that is why I write 'Titular King'. K.C. Singh Baba is called by the name of 'Raja Sahab'. In the Wikipedia of K.C. Singh Baba, as he belongs to the Royal Family of Kumaon (Kashipur) and is the son of Raja Hari Chand Raj Singh ; I believe the word 'Raja' must be applied before his name.

Thank you for reading my implore, I know that you will understand the matter and will allow the needed changes in the sight to take place.

Regards

Yppup0917 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yppup0917 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * As has been requested many, many times, please provide a reliable, third party source that he is "Titular King" and it could probably be included. As a Titular King is an official position, it should not be difficult. However, there has been more than one person claim to be the king, and just the same, failed to provide sources to that effect. If it cannot be reliably sourced, then it does not belong. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 16:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Hey Apparition11, This is to inform you that K.C. Singh Baba is a Titular King of Kumaon as

1. He is the son of Raja Hari Chand Raj Singh of Kumaon.

2. The Capital of Kumaon that is Almora was ruled by Raja Anand Singh and as he had no issues he had given his throne of Almora to Raja Hari Chand Raj Singh of Kashipur. In today there is a school donated by him 'Raja Anand Singh Government Inter College Almora, which was then his palace 'Deaudi Pokhar' or 'Talla Quila' in Almora.

3. K.C. Singh Baba is still the titular king as he starts the Nanda Devi Dolla in Almora every year.

4. He is head of many trust like of Udayraj Hindu Inter College Kashipur which was donated by his Grandfather Raja Uday Raj Singh of Kashipur and of the Ramlila Ground Kashipur which was also donated by Raja Udayraj Singh. 5. If more information is needed please see please see http://www.indianrajputs.com/view/kashipur ,

http://members.iinet.net.au/~royalty/ips/k/kashipur.html

I hope the information which was provided to you was sufficient.

Thank you for reading I hope you will understand.

Regards Yppup0917 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yppup0917 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Please reply in this section instead of the top of my talk page. New sections go at the bottom, and new post about the same subject should stay in that section. Both of those links appear to be self-published sources. Surely there has been an article written in a published newspaper with a history of fact checking or other reliable source that can back up this information? We don't need sources where the subject himself can modify the information. Remember, this is an encyclopedia, we're not here to honor subjects. We're here to reflect what mainstream sources say about the subjects. This discussion should really take place on the article talk page where more people will see it and can chime in. If you can provide good, reliable sources, please start a discussion on the article talk page instead of here. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 21:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

K.C. Singh Baba is a titular king and then you had asked me for reasonable facts that can prove that he is a titular King.

1.  https://www.jagran.com/loksabha-chunaav/general-kc-singh-baba-will-make-hat-trick-of-winning-EL11228541.html

2. https://www.tribuneindia.com/mobi/news/uttarakhand/nanda-devi-festival-starts-in-kumaon/135243.html

3. https://m.patrika.com/amp-news/special-news/happy-birthday-kc-singh-baba-is-related-to-chand-dynasty-of-uttarakhand-1253374/

4. http://wikimapia.org/923013/Raja-K-C-Singh-BABA-Home-Raja-ki-Chawni

5. https://www.jagran.com/loksabha-chunaav/general-kc-singh-baba-will-make-hat-trick-of-winning-EL11228541.html

6. https://www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20061125/delhi.htm

7. as you know Late Raja Hari Chand Raj Singh is the  father of K.C. Singh Baba so https://books.google.co.in/books?id=A0BuAAAAMAAJ&q=Raja+Hari+Chand+Raj+Singh+of+Kashipur&dq=Raja+Hari+Chand+Raj+Singh+of+Kashipur&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjsk7LU_sPeAhWPXisKHQZ2CJoQ6AEIDzAB

8 .https://m.patrika.com/amp-news/special-news/happy-birthday-kc-singh-baba-is-related-to-chand-dynasty-of-uttarakhand-1253374/#referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s

And Many more such matter by which it can be proven that K.C. Singh Baba is a 'Titular King'.

Thankyou Yppup0917 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yppup0917 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Much better than we've been shown before. Again, this needs to be discussed on the article talk page and not mine. However, some tips before that. Sources 1 and 5 are duplicates and from what I can see, just say nothing about him being king, just that he belonged to Chand Dynasty. Sources 3 and 8 are also duplicates. Source 4 is clearly a WP:SPS. Sources 6 and 7 do not seem back up what you are claiming. Quality over quantity. Again, please take to the article talk page for further discussion. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:27, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

K. C. Singh Baba Wikipedia page
Dear , Please add Raja in front of K. C. Singh Baba's name as he is the titular king. Yppup0917 (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Provide a published, reliable source with a history of fact checking describing this, and it could probably be added. Please don't post a list that contains sources not verifying this with poor sources that are not reliable. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 21:05, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Christmas 2018
Merry Christmas! Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 17:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)