User talk:Apparition11/Archives/2014

No heading
Ajyrds (talk) 03:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I apologize if the links I added to the wiki pages for some of the world heritage sites looked spammy. However, it does add value to a reader as it provides comprehensive information on train travel to these world heritage sites. Do let me know what you think.
 * Hello. It's no problem as long as you don't continue adding the link. Feel free to review our external links guideline, and, if you still feel that the link is appropriate, then you are welcome to start a discussion on the target article's talk page or at the external links noticeboard. Thanks. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Karachi
i have edited the Karachi population as per what the source says hope u dont have any probs on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madman 0014 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks good to me. I started to change it to that, and I really should have. Then I got confused as to why I didn't leave an edit summary originally, I try to always leave one. Now I see it wasn't me the first time, but an impersonator. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * and i hope u realize this figure does not include the 3 million bengalis and beharis that were given citizenship in 2012 as the figures are from preliminary census of 2011
 * That would make sense, the sentence does say that is the population as of 2011. If there is an updated source with a more up-to-date figure, I have no objection to it being used and the figure changed. We just shouldn't update a number without updating the source as well. I knew it was slightly out of date, that was why I left it at the range instead of an exact figure, but in hind-sight, I was wrong to do that and should have stuck to exactly what the source said. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * the source mentioned on Karachi page says its from the preliminary census of 2011 as the source also gives the population of all districts in sindh and the source for the citizenship of bengalis and beharis is here http://tribune.com.pk/story/347572/ministerial-proposals-bengalis-biharis-inching-closer-to-citizenship/
 * I'm afraid it's WP:SYNTH when we take more than one source and combine statements to come to a conclusion. However, I did find the source that was likely used (but not cited) for the 23.5 million figure, so I have update the article to include that. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * thanks but please also use the source for that i have provided about the citizenship that was given by the government to the bengalis and biharis that i have quoted here http://tribune.com.pk/story/347572/ministerial-proposals-bengalis-biharis-inching-closer-to-citizenship/ so that a better understanding can develop about the sudden population increase
 * That doesn't actually source anything that I just changed, it just elaborates. Just inserting a source that doesn't actually source the content wouldn't be very good form. However, I think that it would be good content to add to the article, with a good source. That's a little more work than I'm interested in doing at the moment. Feel free to write about it yourself or post on the article's talk page and suggest it though! Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

No heading
thanks u done really well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mynamekaka (talk • contribs) 23:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

External link
Hello mr. kevin

I added an external link which is dedicated entirely to mcleodganj and is quite informative. You have not any right to remove a appropriate link. may i know the reason. --Contributer1993 (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It is obvious that the link is being adding for advertising purposes. The link had already been spammed by your other account, up to a final warning. Please see our external links guideline. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Mr kevin you should verfiy once again as it is not your policy that an appropriate link you remove. if you check links in page are not aimed to contribute you may take look on other links as well may be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributer1993 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I do not understand what you are saying. If you still think the link should be added, you need to get consensus for it on either the article's talk page or the external links noticeboard. If there are other links that you believe are inappropriate, you are welcome to remove them. Having others are not a reason to add more though. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * It also appears that a significant portion of the page you are posting is copied and pasted from the Wikipedia article you are posting it 9 (without attribution). Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi How are you I am Kevin Ashburner From Howick in Auckland in New Zealand.
I want to know how to create a user-page like yours and I am not sure how to can you send me an email at kevinashburner@windowslive.com and tell me how to create a user-page like yours.

I am Kevin Ashburner and I am 23 years old and I am a Sagittarius. I Live in Howick, Auckland, New Zealand. just a few things about myself and I wanted to say hi and this is my first time using The talk - Page for contacting another person on wikipedia user-page on wikipedia. KevinArnoldAshburner (talk • contribs) 17:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! The WP:UPDC page has a lot of great advice for designing user pages. You are also more than welcome to go to my user page and click edit. This will show you the markup that I use for my my page. If there is a specific part that you want to implement (the background, the infobox, etc.), I would be happy to help you do so. Also, I'll leave you a welcome message on your talk page that will contain some useful links. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 16:33, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

this is very urgent for me
how can i remove those edits in which i have got negaive scores? anther thing which i want to know is that how shall i edit that you do not give me warning and i do not red negative scores? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neel Preet (talk • contribs) 01:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the red scores you are talking about are notifications (see WP:NOTIFICATIONS). The warnings that you are getting are because the link does not adhere to our external links policy. Your link is a self-published blog, and it also appears that you are the author of the blog which constitutes a conflict of interest. If you stop adding this link, you will stop getting the warnings; however, if you continue adding this link, you will likely end up blocked from editing. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 02:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Removed lead generation company name
why is it that some companies are allowed to be listed but others are not? Vendere Partners is a lead generation company with over 300 blogs on the topic and related as well as several published articles that can be referenced — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vendbod (talk • contribs)
 * All of the companies listed have their own Wikipedia articles and appear to meet Wikipedia's guideline for inclusion for companies. Basically, to be listed, the company would need to have its own article based on reliable, third party sources. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Checking In
Hi,

Answerbase is a competitor of Qhub so we would like to be listed with the others.

Is there an issue there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.79.206.27 (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. I'm sorry, but the external link that you are adding does not satisfy our external links policy and should not be included in these articles. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Ok, apologize for any confusion and I'll review the external links policy. Thank you for notifying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Answerbase (talk • contribs) 23:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

What is the best way to list Q&A services (not only Answerbase, but others) related to articles. I see that there are already some articles that show related services, does Answerbase need a wikipedia page to be on those lists? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Answerbase (talk • contribs) 23:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Also, Answerbase is clearly relevant to this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q%26A_software where I can understand removing the link but it could be listed along with the other notable providers....correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Answerbase (talk • contribs) 23:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Generally, articles are needed to be included in lists. However, before creating an article, you may want to read WP:1st and WP:NWEB. If an article cannot be backed up by reliable, third party sources, it would run the risk of being deleted. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I thought these were useful resource links
Hi Apparition11

I added the 2 links as they are useful links related to the subject matter. They both contain accurate information regarding the office real estate sector, in particular the executive and serviced types. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realword20 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. I'm sorry, but those links, especially the second one, do not satisfy Wikipedia's external links guideline. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Chak 86 6 r post
On. Hak 86 6 r post what reference u need? I edited on reality basis u can tell me what u need to get as reliable resource. Thanx aamir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aamirarsalan (talk • contribs) 13:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:RS is our reliable source policy. Generally, the types of sources we need are university-level textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, or mainstream newspapers with a reputation for fact checking. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Moving Scam
I am confused as to why it was not approved. I saw that movingscam.com was listed as an external link, movingdetective.com does a similar thing by connecting consumers to reputable companies and puts movers through a checklist for approval as a trustworthy entity. Anyway, I am new to contributing to wikipedia so still learning as I go. Any insight/feedback would be appreciated. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whuntley (talk • contribs) 07:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * It hadn't been removed because it had went unnoticed by anyone who cared. Since you pointed it out, I removed it. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:27, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=598975810 your edit] to Government College University, Lahore may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * * Nawaz Sharif, current Prime Minister of Pakistan
 * Thank you, Mr. Bot. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Removing external link
Hello, You have notified me that you removed a link I 've added yesterday.

I am not so experienced with Wikipedia, so, although I've read some of the guidelines, I'd be happy to check thoroughly and learn why those edits are not considered correct.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smart_city&oldid=599050564&diff=prev)
 * For example, what is wrong with the addition of Cote d'Azur in "examples of use" section for the smart city page?


 * Also, what was wrong with the examples of serious games? (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serious_game&oldid=599049514&diff=prev)

Thanks for your feedback, Agnes AgnesLP (talk) 05:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Regarding Sophia Antipolis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_Antipolis), I would insist to add both Team Côte d'Azur's Investincotedazur.com Sophia-Antipolis entry, and the CASA (Communauté d'Agglomérations de Sophia Antipolis), as both institutions are official - one to promote the science park to foreigninvestors, the other one as an administrative unit.
 * Hello. It was regarding every edit that you made since Feb. 2013. All adding the same link to numerous pages. As per WP:LINKSPAM, ...repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed. Besides that, your link seems to fail WP:ELNO. If you would like to discuss adding the link to a specific page, you really should take it up at that article's talk page or the external links noticeboard. Even if the links are official, per WP:ELOFFICIAL, Normally, only one official link is included. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 06:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I see, thanks. I think the Sophia Antipolis page could benefit a bit more work which I'll do sometime, as for the links, they could be justified but may be not in that place. Thanks for the hints. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AgnesLP (talk • contribs)

Link Removal
Hi,

I have had 2 links removed from the site as per below. These links are all valid for the articles they were in and are not sales driven, simply provide useful information on the relevant topic. Why were they removed or is there anyway to get them reinstated?

http://www.britanniacestrian.co.uk/news/10-essential-tips-moving-home in the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_house

and

http://britanniaremovalsliverpool.co.uk/news/72/move-yourself-or-hire-the-professionals in the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_company

Regards,

Chris Turton 195.69.95.36 (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You had also added a link to Storage. I'm sorry, but these types of pages are added to these articles on a pretty regular basis, always coming from a commercial site. If you feel that the link satisfies Wikipedia's external links guideline, you are welcome to post your reasoning at the target article's talk page or at the external links noticceboard. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 19:18, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Austin,Tx
Look Mr. your'e wroung about the population of Austin look here :money.cnn.com/gallery/real_estate/2014/03/27/fastest-growing-cities/index.html?iid=EL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moturk (talk • contribs) 15:54, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That link does not say that the population of Austin, TX has decreased from 865,504 in 2014 to 8,504 in 2019 as you stated in your edit. The rest of your edit consisted of inserting incorrect dates and breaking links, so I will stand by my revert. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 17:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Re : Austin,tx
Look here mr. I am RIGHT :worldpopulationstatistics.com/austin-population-2013/ that's the population from 2012, look the other article i posted to you said it's population grow by 47,941 that means you NEED to change what you edited that said the current population is 845, and something, so I am RIGHT! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moturk (talk • contribs) 18:06, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, nothing that you are saying has anything to do with my revert to your edit. You claimed that the population had decreased by 857,000 from 2014 to 2019 (which, to the best of my knowledge, has not happened yet). You made another edit after that which was reverted by somebody else. In that edit, while it was not blatantly false like the one I reverted, it was an unsourced change in numbers (see WP:V). If you actually want to help improve the article, you are welcome to post on the article page with sources and explain your concerns; however, you may want to read WP:SYNTHESIS first. While I cannot interpret exactly what you are trying to say, I have a feeling that that may be an issue. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 18:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I was stretching my assumption of good faith as far as it would go, but there is now no doubt that you are just trolling. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 18:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Removal Links From wikepedia
Hello,

I Just Put My External links For providing the information to Wikipedia. IF you think it is spamming then you made a mistake. Wikipedia is all about Putting the information by anyone. I am among them. Please Let me Know Id i did A mistake.

This Is the Wikipedia page where you have remove my links. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relocation_service#References

Thanks For Give the response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.253.144 (talk) 09:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but your link is one of the types of links Wikipedia aims to avoid. It is a link that primarily exists to sell a service. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 09:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

OER inquiry
Hi, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Apologies for the error. I was experimenting but didn't know of the sandbox. Thanks! 24.41.87.69 (talk) 00:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

No heading
Hi Apparition11,

I have add a link of website, because when i visit Dubai this is best company to take city tour and other activates like yacht charter, desert safari, sunset cruise Dhow Dinner. i was experience the best services from this company. i think any one who visit Tourism in Dubai he is looking for tourism services in dubai. i think its very use full link for wikipedia to help people.

I am wondering you are getting my point.

Best Regards,

Faisal Rehman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefrehman (talk • contribs) 05:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see our external links guideline. This link clearly does not pass it. Wikipedia is not here to promote any company, whether considered by anyone to be "the best" or not. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 06:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Let us be cool ?
O.k. very nice, u say do not attack users, editors and so on...then, why don't you show little bit susceptibility in critic articles about Türkiye, are u one of the protecters of like User:Kermanshahi attacking a big nation, presenting wrong, false information all in his articles. I would like you to be more sensible or at least be as sensible as you are on an editor's page. There is no controller for them. they can write everthing by showing some URLs from yellow journalism things. How could u know that this writers true all in all? His citations are all from turkish sites in english articles. he s from iran, lives in germany and always talks about Turkiye's topics. could u start your job by checking this kind of users at first. I m really serious about this topic. I don't give a shit about your populer wiki platform about how to use it but I read it like so many people. Firstly I indicate that as a solicitor, I m not glad to see that there are so much writings abusing your open-source and it allows to create a wrong perception about our worths. Also I dont know and care about who are u but u looked so interested like a moderator right? it s better to say that I don't wanna this subject to be turned into a public prosecution. Because users should know that no country is vulnerable, as Türkiye too and when things couldnt get solved it happens. As a rooted country Türkiye and its nation Turks are protected by constitution and international laws. Both with my Turkish citizen and legist idenfity, I will not hesitate to use the official rights for preventing misleading data and protecting our prestige in international opinion. Anyway nuff said, so if you r really sincere about being correct and objective, please contact us beforehand about publishing important issues :

http://www.tib.gov.tr/tr/tr-menu-60-iletisim.html

http://www.btk.gov.tr/

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InsomniacTR (talk • contribs)


 * I am not getting involved in your dispute. At Wikipedia, disputes are settled on the article's talk page and/or through dispute resolution. We do not resolve disputes by creating a template for the sole purpose of calling someone else a bastard. That method will only lead to you getting blocked. If you want to edit Wikipedia, then you will need to discuss your issues calmly and clearly on the article's talk page without calling everyone who disagrees with you names. Disputes are decided by consensus, so name-calling would be counter-productive anyway. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:03, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

SS7 tutorial
why did you leave the SS7 Tutorial by PT alone, but delete the Tutorial by Patton? Seems quite biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.198.153.78 (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Not being biased, I just saw the Patton link being spammed. If another links violates our external links policy, feel free to remove it. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 19:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Moving E-A-Ski
Hi can you please request someone to move EA-Ski to E-A-Ski and E-A-Ski to EA-Ski and also the associated talk pages. I am confused about how to do it therefore I request you to make such a requests from an editor. I will be greatly obliged. KahnJohn27 (talk) 11:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I started the request at Talk:EA-Ski. If you want to elaborate on the reasoning, feel welcome to do so there. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:17, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Not sure if
I added swot tool to article about swot analysis, because it is free application that helps people to conduct analysis and use knowledge which is shared on the page. Many users from wikipedia created account and use this app and left us massages that the app helped them to understand how to do swot. If it is necessary to conduct more theoretical information more in "encyclopedia" way i would like to share there link to blog https://503thoughts.wordpress.com which contain a lot of information about swot. thank u in advance for your goodwill. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.76.83.130 (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. I am currently on vacation and will not be very responsive for a while. You should not add links to sites that you are affiliated with to Wikipedia, see WP:COI. The blog link would be inappropriate for a couple of reasons: 1) WP:ELNO recommends not using self-published blogs 2) It is also an advert for the same app that you have been adding to articles. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

SWOT linking
On what basis have you removed link describing strategy building use of SWOT and haven't removed whole paragraph describing it? This section was informative and had link to resource explaining process more deeply - it is also referring to product, but so do other links which you haven't removed (such as Mind Tools which is company which profits from their products related to SWOT). In your opinion what is the purpose of wiki - share knowledge with its users or provide useless information with not practical application? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melhomme (talk • contribs) 08:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I removed the link on the basis that it is an unreliable source and ref spam. If you want to to know the purpose of Wikipedia, see WP:5P. One thing that it is not is a vehicle for advertising-as you are attempting to use it as. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Resident Evil Survivor 2 Code: Veronica
Hello User:Apparition11 I want to create an article on the game of the above name. However the article Resident Evil Survivor 2 Code: Veronica already exists but it is actually a redirect to Resident Evil Code: Veronica. However Survivor 2 is a different game than Code: Veronica and thus deserves it's own article. I have written all the information about the game I could find in my sandbox. How should I transfer this information to the article Resident Evil Survivor 2 Code: Veronica that already exists. Should I just simply copy and paste or is there a procedure to this that should be followed like the move request at EA-Ski (I really wonder why no one has even cared to look at that request)? Thank you for help in advance. KahnJohn27 (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe that all you have to do is use on the target page, and an admin will come around eventually to delete it for you, freeing it up to move your page. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * So Resident Evil Survivor 2 article has been deleted. What should I do now? Should I simply move my sandbox to that page or should I submit a draft for review? KahnJohn27 (talk) 08:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can just move it. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Removal of Food Network / Travel Channel Links to TVPlayer
TVPlayer is carrying Food Network and Travel Channel in the United Kingdom as a result of a deal with Scripps Networks, see news article here: http://recombu.com/digital/news/tvplayer-app-adds-travel-channel-food-network

Please can you undo your undos? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.99.173.178 (talk • contribs)
 * WP:ELNO #7 recommends that we avoid Sites that are inaccessible to a substantial number of users, such as sites that only work with a specific browser or in a specific country. It appears that your link is only available in the United Kingdom and falls under this recommendation. Also, looking through your contributions, almost every one of your edits has been to add this link. See WP:LINKSPAM, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed. If you want the link added, especially in the massive scope that you have tried, you need to get consensus somewhere, like perhaps the external links noticeboard. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 11:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

for removing my link in Wearable technology
I think you are right. I didn't read the guideline properly, so sorry. :) I thought it will be useful for readers to find new featured wearable. next time I will be more attentive,

Kind reghards Sona — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sona.bulghadaryan (talk • contribs) 14:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Huggle
This new Huggle version is certainly going to take a while to get used to. Heh. - Amaury (talk) 19:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * :) I'm guessing that there are massive changes in the new version? Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed there are. Sounds like you haven't seen it yet. - Amaury (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Nope, I haven't seen Huggle in years :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 21:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

No heading
This video DOES show a Hunter Mariner. (spam links removed) 15:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demolationfinds (talk • contribs)
 * It is a ceiling fan, it has absolutely nothing to do with Rugby... Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * But then, neither did the Mariners.

In Reply to Your Spamming warning
I included a link to Marketing operations which was quite relevant. I agree I added a company link but the report was quite genuine. This report is from a survey we conducted to see what marketing technologies are companies investing in 2014.

Check out the report to see what it says and how genuine it is : http://www.qedbaton.com/wp-content/uploads/B2B_Marketing_Tech_Spend_Report_2014.pdf

Please let me know if I can include that on the page.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankit016 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * You should avoid linking to sites that you are affiliated with, see WP:COI. Instead of adding the link to any articles, you should instead discuss it on the articles' talk pages. However, you may want to first review our policy on reliable sources. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Removal of External Link
Respected One, I will go with your judgment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3dprojectionmapping (talk • contribs) 16:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

My recent posts have been deleted
Hi,

You have taken away my comments. I added external links... to a free resource. We are not flogging anything like you suggest, so slightly miffed by your suggestions. However it would be good to resolve and place that back again but i haven't got time to keep placing content up there if you are going to keep removing it. We are providing a good amount of content to your readers like the AIC you'll see up there with external links and other organisations... so don't understand your actions against us.

Please explain.

Thank you,

Ed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edmarten (talk • contribs) 16:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe that you may be mistaken. Unless I am overlooking something, I have not reverted any of your edits or left any suggestion to you. However, if your only actions on Wikipedia have been to add the same external link to multiple articles, it is often seen as a sign of link spam and will often be reverted. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 16:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Current King of Kumaon
Hello,

You have been deleting my posts on Kumaon Kings.

Although India is a democratic country and Royalty is officially not recognised but, if you see wikepedia pages there are a number of Kings in each and every state of India, people beleive in them and are revered.

This goes on with out any deletion because the designations are still followed by the highest courts as a tradition.

There is a possibility that your thinking and the practice over here are different. This practice has been followed for the past 100 of years and will still continue as you will accep that practice and faith are a totally different matter.

I will appreciate if the post on Kumaon Kings for Garhwal, Kumaon and Nepal are not deleted.

You can speak to me on +91 7798048251 and this surely can be discussed.

Best Personal Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.106.43.244 (talk) 14:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Unless you can provide a reliable third party source, then the content is not suitable for Wikipedia and will continue to be deleted. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

hi
you accused of viloation of the adveture camp 2 page thats my page so how im vandiliseing it when its my page that i created — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hdog24 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe that you are mistaken as I have not accused you of anything. However, even if you created a page, you still do not own that page. It is still open to community editing. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

No heading
Hey, kevin, it's been 3 times already that you erase my modifications please stop. We are the owner and builder and inventor of hoverboard By Zr. Rocky mountain is our distributor in the usa. So we own the brand and invented the object. Thus it is wrong AND untrue to erase my comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Media-zapata (talk • contribs) 14:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You have a conflict of interest and should not be editing the article yourself. The article is about the hoverboard used in the Back to the Future franchise, not one that is propelled by water. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Edits
Please can you explain why you are deleting my additions as they are adding suitable and relevant information/links to enhance users experience and knowledge of the topic 46.18.218.130 (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It's because your edits appear to be promoting a link that primarily exists to sell products. Since every one of your edits have been to link to that website, it appears that your only goal is to have this link inserted into Wikipedia, see WP:LINKSPAM. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:10, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * not sure that's quite true, but I guess you know best! 46.18.218.130 (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Stop removing Important Links
hello Biggboss8 here please stop inserting unwanted and spammy links in wikipedia also stop inserting links of bigg-boss.in websites better not do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggboss8 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I am simply reverting your spam links that are not at all reliable sources. If you continue adding that link, you will most likely find yourself blocked from editing. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Chand kings
Hello,

The civil words were not working and you were not interested to speak.

The further discussion will not be so civil.

Hope you understand

Royal Pahad

Civil words were not working.

Gave you a link and you did not intend to speak.

Further discussion will not be so smooth

Bursher Gadh

Civil words not working in spite of giving you a link for further discussion to sort it out.

Thanks for not understanding the civil language

Royal Pahad

Civil words did not work and you were not ready to take the discussion forward.

Thanks for not understanding

Mero Kumaon
 * I am open to discussion, but unless you can provide a reliable source, the discussion will be short. You cannot go around claiming that you are king of a place that does not have a king without very good reliable sources. And are you trying to claim to be different people with each of these comments? We are not stupid, it is not hard to tell that all of these comments and all the accounts that have been adding the content are the same person...Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Explain
Please explain why you keep removing links that are quite clearly enhancing the user experience of wikipedia. I am not trying to use wikipedia for "seo" purposes.

Let's have a look at the external links on the black tie page shall we: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_tie#External_links

The third link, emilypost.com - If you look at the site, it is clearly just an affiliate site (see links to amazon etc). This site has very little to do with black tie compared to the links I am adding.

I think we all need to put this behind us and revert the changes you have made.

Thanks

46.18.218.130 (talk) 12:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If another link is inappropriate, then it needs to be removed. I'll take a look at that when I get a chance if nobody else does so first. Your link is one that primarily exists to sell products, see WP:ELNO. If a style guide is needed, surely there is one out there that is non-commercial. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Regarding the emilypost website, I don't see it as "just an affiliate site". I see a few links on bottom, but nothing truly objectionable. It's not like the visitor is bombarded with a 15% off banner when it first loads. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi
Hi..Just wondering if there is any way I could earn a link for my organisation at Wikipedia. I tried to direct the users to the useful infographics on my website, but the links were deleted and I was warned. Can I not create a page in the name of my organisation and list all the services that my organisation provides?Digitalescalatorinternational (talk) 13:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are affiliated with the company, you really should not be writing about it or adding links to it as you have a conflict of interest. If you wish to pursue an article, WP:AFC would be your best bet; however, if the company does not satisfy WP:CORP, you are likely just wasting your time. It would have to have reliable, third party sources that discuss the subject in detail. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:45, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I should also add that it would have to be written from a neutral point of view and not just be a listing of services. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi..Thanks for your quick response. I am a bit scared using this system now because I would not want my organisation to get blacklisted because of any stupid mistake of mine. Please confirm that you have not blocked it or something. Also, could you guide me on how I could delete the wikipedia account? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalescalatorinternational (talk • contribs) 13:54, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It has not been blacklisted and won't so long as it is not further added to articles. I'm sorry, but there is no way to delete accounts. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Ok. No worries. Thanks for your support so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalescalatorinternational (talk • contribs) 14:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Thanks for confirming that it has not been blocked. Feeling a bit relieved. What is and where I could put it up?
 * That is just to delete a user page, not an account. Since User:Digitalescalatorinternational has not been created, it won't do any good. Sorry. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Regarding a change that was made to my edit.
I just want to know what page are you exactly referring to. Thanks
 * It was Travelguru.com, but it was concerning an edit from back in December. If you are not the same person who made that edit, feel free to ignore the message. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 17:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi
I would like more details as to why you deleted my post to backyard wrestling. For someone to say its not credible, well you must not have done any research at all. In fact i challenge you to prove anything i said as incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 19:47, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The question is is it verifiable? I was unable to find any reliable sources to substantiate inclusion. If you can provide some, that'd be great! However, the burden is on the person adding contemt to source it, not on the person removing it to prove it as incorrect. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 19:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

should i just link some newspaper articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 20:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * They could possibly work. It can depend on several different things (ie. Are they about the wrestling organization or do they just mention it, is it WP:UNDUE to devote space to the article for this one organization, etc.) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 20:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

The print story is primarily about backyard wrestling and in particular VBW. and reiterates what i mentioned in my comments. in case you forgot:

"Since the late 90’s Backyard Wrestling has evolved in many ways. For example, one of the most popularized backyard promotions today is VBW (Vancouver Backyard Wrestling), consisting of a roster of experienced pro and seasoned wrestlers. VBW has offered online episodes of their bi-weekly program Wednesday Warfare, since 2001. VBW claims to be backyard wrestling done right. Steering away from the conventional hardcore reputation yarding had earned over the years, VBW prides itself on being safe and very entertaining. And while the venue for the ring is located in a backyard, The production values of the show have been compared to that of WWE or TNA."

Aside from the news articles i've post this because it is relevant. There has been more media talk around backyard wrestling as of late and one of the major players is this VBW. The work they do is well off the map of conventional BYW. i have been watching since the relaunch and this promotion is clearly reinventing what backyard wrestling is considered. searching VBW Wrestling and simply watching a few videos, visiting their facebook and youtube page can easily confirm what i have said here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 20:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Which newspapers have written stories about it? The sources also need to be independent of the subject, so its Youtube and Facebook won't really count. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 20:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I have found a newspaper article of the Maple ridge Times with a full story in the sports section. I have also found other references online from sites other than the VBW site which give match results and reviews of the episodes. Backyard wrestling actually has a pretty poor name and VBW seek to change that. Where most of the backyard wiki shows how low budget, low key, and crazy dangerous hardcore backyard wrestling is, nobody has highlighted the biggest backyard wrestling company today. In my opinion having a backyard wrestling article without mention of VBW is unreal. Production on the season 3 shows (newest episodes) is rivaled only by those of WWE. VBW houses pro trained wrestlers such as Ritchie Destiny and Mike Dempsey. (which i can also provide information for). I think people who are interested in reading about backyard wrestling have the right to be educated about backyard wrestling done right.

as well some of the references for your current information on backyard wrestling are actually sort of weak and one leads to a broken link. Can we work together here to make sure people do get the right information on backyard wrestling. Currently i see the info as out dated. the arrival of Youtube and social media video sharing has changed teh face of backyard wrestling and i believe people need to read about its evolution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 22:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It seems that the Maple Ridge Times is a local paper, and, while that does not mean that it is unreliable, being the only published source, doesn't demonstrate much WP:N. None of the Google hits that it gets appear to be reliable and it doesn't get any Google News hits. I really don't see how it merits inclusion. I agree that the article needs considerable help. The Wikihow references are not reliable; the dead link (while being dead is not necessarily the end of the world because of Internet archiving) is not reliable; and the Angelfire link is questionable. Improvement is needed, but, frankly, adding every promotion that claims to be the biggest/best/top promotion would fill the article up pretty quickly. You are welcome to open up a section at Talk:Backyard wrestling to get more editors' opinions, but I really don't see how adding that is an improvement. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

The fact remains that without watching the product or actually having knowledge about the current state of backyard wrestling how can you judge that it does not warrant inclusion? It is not a claim that VBW is the best backyard wrestling on the internet it is FACT and the current belief amoung Backyard wrestling fans. Any wrestlings or backyard wrestling fans who watch the VBW product will concur there is no competition for VBW in yarding. Have you seen an episode? It caught me by complete surprise but its unlike any backyard wrestling ever seen before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 23:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter whether I've watched an episode or not, all that matters is whether or not it has been covered by reliable sources. So far, this has not been demonstrated. Wikipedia is based on third party sources, not individual editors' opinions and/or original research. Until the press starts to cover them, they shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. How do we gauge that VBW is the best backyard wrestling on the internet it is FACT and the current belief amoung Backyard wrestling fans? Don't get me wrong, they may be the greatest promotion in history, but unless reliable, third party sources start to cover them, Wikipedia is not the place for it. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

I look forward to proving you and your smug attitude very wrong. You clearly have never even set foot in a ring and are probably unqualified in every way to judge wrestling. The current backyard wrestling page has no media coverage...the references are terrible. A couple quotes and some old broken pages. All you are doing is holding people back from current updated information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 00:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Have fun with that. Again, it does not matter if I have set foot in a ring, what matters is reliable sources. I would appreciate if you ceased with the Ad hominems though. They really do not help your case. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

and whats a reliable source???? FOX NEWS? Give me a break man. Best reliable source...use your damn brain and take a look with your own eyes. I personally challenge you to find a more professionally produced yet still very backyard wrestling promotion. As a matter of fact if you do find it, please feel free to message me at marcunelli@shaw.ca and i will personally send you a paypal payment for $500 marked as donation. You have my word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 00:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, Fox News is a reliable source. Please see WP:RS for more information about reliable sources. I am not here to find one that is more professionally produced. I am acting as a Wikipedia editor, we do not use our opinions and original research to write an article. Please see WP:5P to get a feel for what Wikipedia is all about. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Ok, well that was a joke because Fox News is the most unreliable news source known to man. Full of lies and right wing opinion. I will get your media sources. They are working on a story for Global news this week. Talk to you soon........ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 00:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Let's keep this discussion on the talk page of the article. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

ok my bad, last one. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcanthonyunelli (talk • contribs) 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

/* External links */
Sorry, i only check that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.188.222.92 (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

reply of your message about article online shopping in bangladesh
i added in classified website list of my website http://www.marketa2z.com, i don't know why u again and again remove it. you can find our website name in bangladesh central bank website and many popular news website and blog. hope you understand

thanks

shahinul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.9.115.130 (talk) 09:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * It is because Wikipedia is not a directory and your website is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you are affiliated with the website, you have a conflict of interest and should not be adding that link to articles. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Link on Ramdhari Singh Dinkar Page
Why is the link I put on behalf of Anhad Kriti Hindi literary magazine considered inappropriate for this page. The magazine lists poet's life-sketch and many prominent works and serves a good resource for seekers and hindi lovers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajvibha (talk • contribs) 00:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Between your edits, this IP's edits, and Vibhachaswal's edits, there is obviously an effort to have this link included in as many articles as possible. This is WP:LINKSPAM. Also, you really should stick to one account, as that is sockpuppeting. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:26, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Reg: Edits on Homework & Ghostwritting Page
Hi Apparition! Thank you for taking time to review the edits made! IMHO those edits can serve some good & relevant purpose for the readers of the encyclopedia by providing an example to the content written on the page. For e.g. In the case of Homework, the line where I made the edit stated that 'there were several websites which provided homework help at nominal rates' without providing any citation or reference to any such website. The website which had been linked to is one such organization which is a provider of homework help services & thus can substantiate the text written on the page. Hence, I hope those edits are reverted back! Thanks again! Jimmy 9126 (talk) 07:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If there were a notable example with a Wikipedia article, we could probably link to that article; however, we should not link to an external site like that per WP:ELNO. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

NGOs
Can i Add new link "NGO" (Non Government Organizations) ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inventpn (talk • contribs) 15:21, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, that really depends on what kind of link that you are considering adding. Is it an internal link to another article that is relevant and satisfies MOS:LINK? If so, then yes, absolutely. Is it an external link to a site that is well written about the general subject and satisfies WP:EL? If so, then likely. Is it an external link to a specific organization (especially one that has already been spammed)? If so, then most likely, no. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

No heading
Hello, I recently edited the "Kathy Boudin" page in the summary section. The first sentence is clearly a summary of her life accomplishments. I added one of her most well known accomplishments to that section and it was removed. I think it's vital information that helps explain the person people are looking up. Also many people like myself came to this page just to verify that information. JazzAK714 (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * It appears that the crime is detailed in the body of the article. Calling it an "accomplishment" seems a little... off. You can go to the talk page of the article and discuss it being in the the first sentence even though it is described it the rest of the lede, but please keep the WP:BLP policy in mind. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your opinion of what an accomplishment is, is irrelevant. The person bio page clearly states that both positive and negative should be included. This person is a well known murderer and it should be stated as such in the first sentence to preface the remainder of the article. Now that someone has changed the second sentence I am satisfied. Still talking about her HIV work without mentioning she's a murderer appears to be biased in tone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JazzAK714 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You calling it an accomplishment is insincere at best. If my opinion is irrelevant, why the hell did you come here when I am not at all involved in this dispute? Pro tip: If you don't want somebody's opinion, don't come and ask him for it, especially if he is completely uninvolved and has never even edited the article! The article's talk page is the place to discuss any improvements to the article, not the talk page of someone who couldn't care less about the article. I will note though, that the second sentence was changed before you ever edited the article. The version before you edited is exactly the same as the current version. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

No heading
Hello

I see you removed my message. However I must tell you that I am trying to really push what IKEA is actually like. All your posts are pretty positive and does not reflect IKEA in the real world. They have caused my company 1000 jobs and I would certainly like you to reflect that on your page. They are ruthless! much more then any retailer in the world. Please reflect real world experiences and the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.120.90 (talk) 12:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Criticism can certainly be added to articles, assuming that it its sourced with reliable sources and written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should be written as such. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 20:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

No heading
Hi,

You removed a link from a page I added to because you said it was inappropriate. Can you please tell me why that is?

Thank you, Adam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Label Makers Perth (talk • contribs) 02:45, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * It is because your link is purely about a selling product, not about informing/educating. It is not a reliable source or an appropriate external link. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 10:48, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit war
Please desist from reverting the anon edits to Jeremy Siegel and read WP:EW. You will be temporarily blocked if you continue – should be blocked now if I follow the letter of the law rule. Follow the advise on that page. I have blocked 2 anon editors and will temp protect the page if the situation continues. --Kbh3rd talk 04:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * It is an obvious sock puppet of User:David Beals who is a serial vandal and puppeteer and is therefore exempt from WP:3RR. Please see the history of Alchemy for a very recent example and Sockpuppet investigations/David Beals for more background. I requested temp protection a lil while ago because he generally does not stop until it is. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:42, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

I have blocked and noted 2 IPs (though he seems to easily hop to new ones) and have protected the page from non-autoconfirmed users. Stronger protection can be considered if he gets around that. The proper action in this situation really is to call in administrator help to put an end to the pointless and otherwise endless rounds of edits. --Kbh3rd talk 04:53, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I know that is the proper action. That is why I did ask for administrator help. I highly doubt that stronger protection will be needed. If he creates more accounts, they are generally very quickly blocked. He's not very subtle. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:55, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I didn't see your admin request, just having stumbled upon the situation by looking at recent changes. As I read the guidance, though, I think the proper action would be to ask for help and then step back rather than continual reverting. The 3RR rule seems to apply to all editors equally. Maybe more leniency for dealing with obvious malfeasance; haven't scanned WP:EW that closely myself. And, frankly, my use of and familiarity with admin functions is a bit stale, taking an extended break from most of that sort of stuff while continuing to make more pedestrian contributions to Wikipedia and to Commons. --Kbh3rd talk 05:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I hate to antagonize with this, but that really rubs me the wrong way. Please do read the policies that you are citing before threatening to block long-time editors. I do know that policy very well and re-read it in order to brush up from time-to-time just in case of any changes. As said in WP:EW, a couple of the exemptions are:
 * 3. Reverting actions performed by banned users, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users.
 * 4. Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language.
 * Since he is posting Youtube videos of ceiling fans to BLPs and random articles, I fail to see how that could possibly be anything better than trolling. With that being said, I was slow on mentioning who the vandal was in an edit summary, and I do apologize for that. I finally got around to it after I realized what your blocking reasons were and that you may not be informed of this situation. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 05:25, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Pink Floyd - The Endless River - Reception Section
Hello Apparition11,

The newer and updated critical reviews are in for The Endless River album and now the band has reached favorable status with Metacritic and the press. I believe the changes I have made recently are accurate and should now be allowed on the page.

Thank you,

PumaBoi12
 * Hello. I think that you have the wrong editor, as I have never edited that article. You may want to check the article history and see which editor it actually is that is involved in the dispute. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Muller c-gate
What is the ; c gate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.64.12 (talk • contribs)
 * See C-element Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:08, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

No heading
GillyGish (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC) I edited the info box of a page. But since I didn't check the preview of it after saving it, info box has disappeared and all the other symbols and text which must not appear has appeared. As a new user I have no idea about this.
 * I fixed it by reverting back to the previous version. Her credentials are really not necessary there. That type of information is more appropriate in her own article. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 07:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Gujranwala Link
That is the Refrence Link of Pakistan Flying DISC Federation, if you found that's not related. it's ok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fakharenaveed (talk • contribs) 07:37, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, now I see what you were doing, but yeah, still not the type of ref we're looking for. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 07:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

No heading
Joshua.19.23 (talk) 02:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Hello, you took down something I did on the Kingswood-Oxford page. I actually attend Kingswood and I know Josh and his brother Jake, so that information is 100% true. Josh is a child prodigy in being smart, he has a very high IQ. I feel that is important because the page talks a lot about the past, and I was just trying to talk a little more about the present.
 * Original research is not allowed on Wikipedia. Content should be sourced by reliable, published sources. Writing about two brothers who happen to have taken part in student government is not at all encyclopedic... Neither is speculating about which is the "much smarted brother". Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 02:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Casa Particular
Songonero (talk) 06:56, 27 November 2014 (UTC)I am the creator of the casa particular page and the reference I added it is a reliable one as I got my content from there. Please, don't delete it again. Thanks.
 * Being the creator does not mean that you own the article. That link is not a reliable, third-party, published source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is a primary source that exists solely to sell something using only flowery desciptions (you'll be part of the family, feel completely at home, etc.). On top of all of that, it doesn't even mention the content that you are claiming that it sources... I will be happy to ask at the reliable source noticeboard if you wish to get other editors' opinions, but I think that this is pretty cut-and-dry. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 07:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not saying I own the article, I said I created it and I got the information from that site (even when the exact content might not be there anymore). Maybe for you what's there are flowery descriptions but you don't probably understand the way things are in Cuba or the concept of a bed and breakfast as compared to staying in hotels there. It was only on 1997 after many many years that Cubans were allowed to let rent out their rooms to foreign travelers. The internet was practically non-existent and a few sites started to promote these casas particulares. "You'll be part of the family" was an important statement as that would reassure travelers this "new" type of accommodation was going to help them get to know the real Cuban people by living in their own homes. At the same time "feel completely at home" would help making them feel at home themselves as there was the idea that private accommodation was sub-standard.
 * So, yes, please, ask the reliable source noticeboard and I am sure you understand there are some topics which are very country specific like this one. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Songonero (talk • contribs)
 * I requested at Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 21:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

No heading
i will block u junk editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.146.246 (talk) 23:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Good luck with that. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:44, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

No heading
Thank you for your feedback. I found related articles in the area I am interested in - Indian photography / art and have collected information from the different wiki pages / newspaper publications etc., to edit Tiruvannamalai page. I understand the specific way to add photograph and have requested the author to send proper permission. The texts were not copyrighted. Your comment is for the text or it is for the image? This will help. Thank you. Tslnadar (talk) 09:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It was just concerning the images. The message that I left was a standard template, which I should have examined more closely. Since the images do not meet WP:NFCC, the owner would have to release the images under an acceptable free license. This would allow them to be re-used not only by Wikipedia, but by anyone, including for commercial purposes. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank You. This Helps.. Tslnadar (talk) 07:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear Apparition11, Namaste. My text to Tiruvannamalai page has been deleted by sriram mt. Would like to know the reason. Could you please guide me how to go about this? the text had appropriate reference and relevance to Tiruvannamalai page. A very key historical relation between Tiruvannamalai and Photo art is what I had added. Regards, Tslnadar (talk) 06:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Well to start, the image you inserted is clearly another WP:COPYVIO. That is made obvious since you had to put a copyright notice is the description. As for the text, he removed it claiming that it was also a copyright violation. If the text was copied and paste of text that is under copyright, then it is also inappropriate. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear Apparition11, the image has been released by the author as a public domain. As I am new, I did know how to give credits to photographs. Had seen similar style in other photography pages and did the same. The description was my choice and so I can change the description. The text is not copyrighted as it has been collected from different publications in press, their website etc (please see the references added to the text that has now been deleted). Wikipedia has so many interesting information, however I found information about Indian art / artists and photography / photographers is missing. As much as I am very much willing to edit other wiki pages, to begin with I find this as an area I can contribute - in English and Tamil languages. This is my intention. So, as the text is not copyrighted, and as it has sufficient reference - how do I go about this - undo and make the relevant description changes for the photographs? Sorry to take much of your time, the reason to press on this matter is not to repeat similar mistakes when I create other pages. I am actually dedicating a lot of time amidst my busy work schedule to edit / create these pages. Thank you. Tslnadar (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Image credit is given on the file page, so in the article there is no need for copyright information. There is no need of even mentioning the author unless it benefits the reader. As for the text, your best bet would be to discuss it with the editor who reverted it. I'm not seeing what the issue is, but the other editor may see something that I do not. Copyright is a serious and sometimes complex issue. For example, if you closely paraphrase something, it is still a copyright violation despite having changed the words. I'm not saying that this is the case here, (I honestly don't know) I'm just pointing an often misunderstood fact out. Being collected from different publications does not mean that it can't be a copyright violation. If one sentence is being copied, that is a copyvio as well. Again, I don't know whether this is the case or not. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Foot Fetishism page
Hello, you removed my addition to Foot Fetishism because I did not have sources to the living people. I am still new and confused about how to use the site, and don't know how to source my additions. If you could do so that would be great. My user is Classic_ghoul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Classic ghoul (talk • contribs)
 * Hello. As to how to cite sources, basically, you put your source between . We have a handy page that can explain it better than me as well as explain it more in depth; It can be found at WP:REFB. One important thing to note is that when dealing with living people, we must use very reliable sources and avoid poor ones such as blogs or tabloids. WP:BLPSOURCES has more info on that. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 03:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Spam links
That's curious. What I saw was a set of spam links similar to those that the users in question had been adding to other pages - but no warning message. That seemed to me to be inadvisable although, looking at your history, I could see you were an experienced user and was wondering why you'd done that. Is there something wrong with that template? Deb (talk) 15:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't add another warning because they had already been warned for those edits, so I saw no reason to add another warning for the same edits. The template that I added is to help track the spammers (as advised at WikiProject_Spam). With the links at users' talk pages, one can simply go to the External links search and quickly see all of the IPs/accounts that have been identified as having spammed the link. There have been 7 identified, but now the search only brings up 5 of them. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I see - well, sorry about that but it appeared all you were doing was giving them a copy of the links. I couldn't figure it out.  Thanks for letting me know about that utility but maybe the links should only be used in conjunction with the template, so as to avoid confusing old people like me who can't tell their xxxx from their elbow :-) Deb (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * :) No problem. I restored the tracking links inside a regular warning template. All of the other links that provides may be useful for people smarter than me, but having a link to track is the only thing that matters to me. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 16:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)