User talk:Apparition11/Archives/2016

Happy New Year!


Amaury (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Amaury (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

You live; you learn
Got pulled over today for the first time ever. It was actually a pretty fun experience. It wasn't anything major compared to other offenses. I'll just quote what my mom posted on Facebook:

Amaury and I drove down to Yakima today so he could buy his textbooks for next quarter. On our way back, as he was entering I82 at the Selah/Canyon Road entrance, he crossed the solid white lines to get around a semi, then moved over to the left as quickly as he could so the semi could merge. Just as he got up to speed, he slowed down and pulled over and I'm thinking what's going on when I look in my side view mirror and see WSP lights flashing. He hadn't been speeding but I figured he was stopped because of the way he entered I82. The trooper was really friendly and I think respected that Amaury was respectful. As I handed him the registration and insurance card, I told him that we had been buying books for college and that he was my driver because I had had surgery. He asked him where he was going to college and said he was a good kid for taking care of me. Then he went back and ran a driver check on him, came back to the car, told him again that it is illegal to cross the solid white lines!!!! NO tIcket! I was more nervous than Amaury - don't know why. He had been working on not crossing those lines, but just got a little impatient behind the semi. It was a good learning experience for him. But it was the second compliment he received from a stranger today. At the bank, the drive through teller called to us as we left the lobby to tell us that he was a good kid because she saw him helping me across the icy parking lot. He is a good kid and I'm proud of him!

Considering I've been driving since January 31, 2009, getting my driver's license on April 16, 2011, this isn't bad at all. Having a clean record also really does wonders, and I still have one! Amaury (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It's always good to get out of a traffic stop without a ticket. Nothing lost but some time, but a life lesson gained :) It sounds like you did a nice job of keeping your poise. Also, good job for being there to help your mother out when she needs it! It sounds like you're doing alright :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 17:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. And yeah, I don't remember if I ever mentioned it you, but my mom had a total right hip replacement on November 9, 2015, so I've been helping her since. Amaury (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Now that you said that, I believe you did. My memory is not what it used to be :) I hope she's progressing alright. It sounds like you have been doing all that you can to make it as easy as possible. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 18:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Guess what?
Look here. Up to five inches expected. Started around 3:45 AM and we already have about an inch. Amaury plus that equals super happy. Have a look at the hourly and ten-day as well (and click the view next links, too!) because awesome! There's also a radar if you scroll down when Today is selected to give you a more accurate idea. Amaury (talk) 16:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong with a little white on the ground for the holidays :) I hope you enjoy it! Here in TN, it doesn't like we'll be getting any for a while, plenty of rain but no snow... Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 16:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * What's even more interesting is that the East/Northeast (New York, Chicago, etc.) has yet to get any snow. Usually, their first snowfalls are before the West/Northwest. We've already had two-four storms as well as just days where it snowed moderately, but nothing stormy, and it's only December. This is the second one in our city, but a lot of the passes had one or two more (see current conditions for one of the major passes: http://www.wsdot.com/traffic/passes/snoqualmie/default.aspx). Amaury (talk) 17:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Gotcha, be careful out there! I love the snow when I can just stay home, but it can suck if you have to be on the go... Those don't look like very favorable driving conditions. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 17:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I love driving in bad weather conditions. And we're in another winter storm warning for today. It's already snowing and will continue until the evening. Moderate and heavy at times. Three to six inches predicted on top of the five inches we already have. Amaury (talk) 16:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It's hard to have more fun than in a car on an empty, ice-covered parking lot :) Have fun! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 19:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Here are some photos I've been meaning to link you to:
 * http://kh-vids.net/threads/happy-first-day-of-winter.152291/#post-4268308
 * http://kh-vids.net/threads/happy-first-day-of-winter.152291/#post-4268940


 * The two in the second link are from today. Also, if for some reason the browser doesn't scroll you to the correct place, which is a problem a lot of times with Firefox on that site, it's posts #9 and #18 (you can see the number in the bottom-right corner of each post).


 * Also, if you have a look at my contributions, you'll see that last night was a blast. Amaury (talk) 19:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The same can't be said for every part of the South. Somewhere in Texas, I think the Panhandle, got 10 feet of snow. Also, a friend of mine from that same thread just showed us this. Fun, right? I'm a bit jealous, but I'm sure we've been hit that hard before, I just can't remember. Also, I'm now curious and want to see your weather. :3 You live in Cookeville? I got that from looking at the university you attend. This is our weather: http://www.weather.com/weather/today/l/USWA0130:1:US I also recommend you look at the 10-day as well (and click the view next 5 days link). It'll be some fun days. Amaury (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I saw that. It's crazy that Texas is getting a blizzard while I'm running around outside in shorts :) I live pretty close to Cookeville. It's about 70 degrees here atm, but temps are supposed to drop off a bit after this front goes through. It's not supposed to get nearly as cold as it is in your neck of the woods though :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * So I had a look, and since you're pretty close, you'll probably be hit with the 100%-chance thunderstorms tonight. I love thunderstorms! And yeah, there was a meme posted in my thread here about that, which I think fits pretty well. Amaury (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * lol Poor Texas... I don't really mind storms, but would just assume not :) I do like a good hard rain from time-to-time, but I'm about sick of it. My front yard is practically a swamp now... The storms missed me for the most part, though it did rain steadily all day and there is a small chance that an isolated storm will hit, but, for the most part, it looks like most of it is past us now. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * From temperatures that were as low as -2 degrees Fahrenheit for three-four days to more snow! Yay! It's snowing pretty good right now. The car's already getting covered. There will be a break in a little while from looking at The Weather Channel's Weather in Motion gadget before increasing again this afternoon around 4:00 PM. Temperatures are warming up again, though. It's 16 degrees right now.
 * Also, I received my first ever death threat toward me and my family all because I reported a user multiple times for block evasion since they were using IPs to evade their block. So mature, am I right? (I mean, I know it's a serious issue and all, and I reported it, but I still can't help but laugh at how butt-hurt vandals get. Although, admittedly, they likely aren't and they're just putting on a show for attention.) Amaury (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The snow sounds good to me; those temperatures, not so much :) It is starting to cool off enough here to make me wear a coat... You have to love the Internet tough guys. I once was threatened by an IP who claimed that they were a "Navy Seal sniper" who would shoot me when I left my house :) I haven't gotten too many of those threats, usually it's just vandals who like to call me Nazi, Hitler, or some variation of penis. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Why are you deleting my link in the external links section when there is two websites that offer what I do but their list is not as extensive and they are copycats
There is helpful information on our website for artist and bands, we are a non-profit organization because the with the little money we make we update our Music Industry Contacts Directories! You allowed the links of the two websites below and they both copied our business model, go ahead look it up! We have had this website address since 2004 and before that we owned recordcontacts.com since 1999! Not cool, not fair bro! You won't allow my link in the external links section but you will allow copycats like http://showbizltd.com/ShowbizLtd Music Agents List and http://www.musicpowers.com/Music Industry Managers Article

Thank you

Ryan Clement 818 459 2004 riveechi@gmail.com www.ryanclementmusic.com

ShowbizLtd Music Agents List Music Industry Managers Article
 * If you are affiliated with the web site, then you have a conflict of interest and should not be adding the link into articles yourself. The other links may have slipped through the cracks and may not belong. I'll check that out in a few minutes. With that being said, the inclusion of inappropriate external links does not mean that more should be allowed. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Not SPAM! Your not being fair! I included three instances of links from websites that sell information just like us but not as legitimate!
The following link below is in your external links section for Talent Manager and Music Managers, the link is to a company like ours as well although they are not as legitimate and don't have anywhere near as much helpful information because we started the music industry contacts industry online in 1999, we put the Yellow Pages Of Rock out of business in 2002, they sold a book for $150. We are more relative then all the links in your external links section, Google music managers and our music managers page is on the first page! SPAM! Our website is not spam, it took along time and effort to create all the content on our music managers page, we offer more accurate information then the links that you allowed below! I'm offended because I am the independent music industry and artists and bands can learn a lot from me. I'm a successful artist and producer myself and our website www.allmusicindustrycontacts.com sells books and you allowed a lot of links to people that write books about the music industry, look at what we give away for free on our website, not fair, not cool! SPAM! That's ridiculous! I bet the owners of the links below are your friends or something because you obviously didn't Hassel them about their links! All the links on your website are from websites that do exactly what we are doing except we are way more legit! www.ryanclementmusic.com

Ryan Clement riveechi@gmail.com

^ When Does My Band Need A Manager? Getsigned.com July 16, 2003

^ Band Manager Info at Media Positive Radio ShowbizLtd Music Agents List Music Industry Managers Article
 * There is no need to make a new section for every comment. I removed the entire external links section in this edit. Are you here to improve Wikipedia or get your website included? If your only interest is the latter, then yes, it is spam. At the moment, that is all that you have done on Wikipedia, so indications are that that is your goal. I have no affiliation with any of the sites. I am here only to help improve and maintain Wikipedia. If you are not here for the same reason, then you are not here for the right reasons. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * By the way, I removed the first reference you listed in this section. It was not a good source. I do not see the second "link" you listed. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:List of K.C. Undercover episodes#Absences
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of K.C. Undercover episodes.

I realize you're not really an expert in this field, but I feel that's why you'd be perfect for providing feedback. Right now it's basically editors who are, I guess for lack of a better word, biased on one side—the not keep side—versus editors who are biased on the other side—the keep side.

With regard to editors I have personally interacted with ever since I became a regular in editing TV articles, such as adding upcoming episodes, splitting articles, etc., Nyuszika is on the keep side with me, Geraldo is kind of on both sides, but more on the keep side (I think) as he sees no harm in having that, and I have the utmost respect for him, and IJBall is neutral; however, he also has experience editing TV-related articles. This is where you come in. Someone who's completely neutral to everything would be incredibly useful in providing feedback as there would be no biased view at all.

I feel like I've kept my comments 99% civil. I haven't attacked anyone directly and the like, I don't think, but anyone reading that can see I'm beginning to lose patience, if I haven't already lost it, ha. I'm not that person anymore, you know that, but hey, we still have bad days every now and then. As long as it's within reason and it doesn't turn personal and the like, I don't see it as too big of a problem.

Who knows? Maybe something I said is wrong, and I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong—unlike the pre-indefinite block days, ha—but right now, I feel it's best if I just take a step back. Amaury (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * As usual, I'm sure that I won't be much help, but I'll try to give my take on it :) I don't really see any incivility yet, but it is obvious that tempers are rising. For that, taking a step back and a deep breath can definitely be a good strategy. Everyone involved is doing what they believe is right. I kind of see both sides. It does seem a bit trivial to me without more context. IMHO, WP:TVCAST is supposed to be mainly concerned with the cast section, not really the episode section, but, I can see how some people could want to apply it to anything related to the cast. Personally, I'm not a big fan of using the show itself as a source even though Wikipedia currently accepts it, so my true opinion is really invalid and not based in Wikipedia practice... My preference would actually be for third-party sources to discuss the absences, and, if they do, include it, if not, don't. However, that really does not matter since Wikipedia does not work that way. While I would probably lean towards inclusion, I don't have much preference either way. However, the article should be kept as-is until consensus is formed, and, if this extends to many different articles, a discussion and possibly an RFC at the most relevant Wikiproject would probably be the best. I hope that makes sense, it is a bot rushed. Gotta head to work :) Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The other thing is, as IJBall posted after you replied, some guidelines shouldn't be followed too strictly, either, per that readers first thing IJBall linked to. He said the same thing to me when I was being too strict with WP:OVERLINKING, and I accepted it. I didn't argue back and forth. Amaury (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, guidelines are kind of tricky. They are definitely flexible and should be used with judgement and common sense. Of course, how flexible they should be vary from editor to editor. Some editors feel that they should be followed unless there is a very good reason not to. Some editors feel more that they are there for basic outlines but not to dictate much in an article. Most editors fall somewhere in the middle. I fall more towards the former. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 23:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Major Changes
Made some pretty significant changes to both my user and talk pages. Whatcha think? For my talk page, it's not immediately noticeable as all it is is a table change on the main talk page. However, for my archives, you know I had, for example, a 2009 page with a table with links to each month that had discussions—months that didn't have discussions weren't even shown, though I did have no discussion months there originally, but I changed that because it was superfluous in that case to have a bunch of zeros. Anyway, in some cases, I was only using those month pages for one discussion, so I figured it'd be better to condense things and create new pages only on a yearly basis. There are still short ones—one only has two discussions—but still. And vice-versa, there are now long ones. Amaury (talk) 02:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like you have the same amount of information in a lot less space. I like it :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:54, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Uh-oh!
What happened to your talk page? Amaury (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha It actually is a lil more peaceful without all of the comments :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * In any case, there must have been some clean-up or something. I just updated my edit statistics, and while most are only little, some are a more noticeable change. And even with the little ones, there usually aren't that many. It's just one of those things I guess we'll never understand like we discussed last time I brought it up. Amaury (talk) 00:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Re: Electronic health record
hello Apparition11,

i added that external link as reference link, if that is not allowed please let me know is there any chance to add my link on wikipedia, i tried to replace a dead link with my link but didn't work.

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulchavan85 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Typically, when hyperlinking a word that isn't very common and we think some readers won't know what it is, we'll link it to an internal article rather than externally link it. In regard to linking externally or generally adding links as sources, it would be a good idea to read up on WP:ELNO, WP:LINKSPAM, WP:RELIABLE, and WP:VERIFY. Amaury (talk) 05:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion is absolutely not allowed. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

why?
Hello! I'm new to the Wiki. Could you please tell me why my edits were erased? Thanks, Maria') (current)Maria29082908 (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it's perfectly clear from the edit summary he gave. It's a red link; therefore, no such article exists, and we don't link to non-existent articles per WP:REDNOT. Amaury (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I probably should have put a lil more detail in my edit summary, but Amaury basically explains it. To expand a bit further, the See also section is a section that directs readers to tangentially related articles. Therefore, a link that does not point to an existing article does not belong. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 18:40, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Feedback Request
I want to make a section on my user page—or maybe add it to the sidebar with my information; if that's possible, let me know—where I list the editors I work collaboratively and have a friendship with. I just don't know what to name it so that it gets the point across, but is also short and concise. One idea is Fellow Editors, but I don't think that gets the "collaboration" point across. Any ideas? Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 18:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know of a way to change the sidebar. I guess a script or something could be written, but that's over my head and, likely, only people with said script installed would see it :) I've seen other editors with sections like that, but for the life of me can't remember who or what they were titled... "Fellow Editors" sounds fine to me. My best alternatives would be something like "Frequent Collaborators", "Wikipedia Colleagues", "WP Friends", "Editing Confidants", or various combinations of those. Don't really think any of those have a particularly nice ring to them, but they're the best I can come up with :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 19:55, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Unrelated, but might as well just use this section.

Thought you might be interested in a life update. Mom is starting her first round of chemotherapy on Friday, both the pills and the infusion. I can't remember the exact details, but it will be the pills, I think, twice a day for three weeks with an infusion once a month for at least six months. The length may or may not increase or decrease. On the week she has an infusion scheduled she'll be on a break from the pills.

Full story here on my June 20 post—or June 21 as a guest since guest time zone is Eastern. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 21:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow, that whole situation is horrible, but I'm glad that they ended up being contained and removed. Stay strong! I hope everything goes well from now on. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 18:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yup, yup. Thank you. The important part is that she's going to be just fine, and the chemo is being done more as a preventative/precaution as mentioned in the thread than anything. At 64, I think she can handle a small six-month bump in the road, even after adding the more minor bumps in the road like her hip surgery.


 * On a yet again other unrelated note, it feels good to be on the other side of the spectrum, because it means I can get involved in discussions like this where I'm otherwise uninvolved, something I've been trying to do more of, though I know it's not your cup of tea. In that specific case, I even used my own bad experiences from when I used to be a chronic edit warrior myself to try and offer advice. You might get a good laugh or two reading that whole thing. For example, you'll notice a lot of users there were getting all worked up and there I was just staying calm and collected. :) Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 20:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * :) It's always great when you can turn negative experiences from past mistakes into something positive and use it as insight. Staying calm and collected seems to be becoming a lost art in a lot of Internet cultures, but as long as we can keep in ours (at least for the most part), there is still hope for Wikipedia. Nice job! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Custom Signature Help
You may have noticed that I modified my signature a bit to include a quick link to my contributions (I even originally had a link to my sandbox, but I didn't feel that was relevant). This is the code I have: Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ). Notice how I have #top for my talk page, because if I don't, it will just bold it like it does in your signature and not link it. However, this means that #top is in the URL even on comments I make outside of my talk page. I notice on the default setup, though, when there is no custom signature, the #top is only included in the URL on talk pages. Is there any way with a custom signature to only make it show #top when on my talk page. It seems possible because I've seen at least one other user with a custom signature with #top in the URL only on the talk page.

I should add that the current way works and is really no big deal, so WP:NOTBROKEN could apply here. :P It's just a really tiny visual thing. You'll notice with #top, it doesn't take you exactly to the top of the browser page, but the beginning of the talk page, if that makes sense. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 05:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I know what you're talking about, but don't really know the solution. I was going to say a possible fix would be parser functions on a subpage, but I checked WP:SIG and saw that parser functions in sigs are forbidden. Without that, the only workaround that I can think of would be to create a redirect to your talk page in your user space and have your sig point to that redirect. I imagine that would work, but don't know if it's worth the hassle. Hope this helps some though. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Probably not worth the trouble, then. Again, it's only a minor visual thing, or I could just remove the "#top" and deal with "talk" not being a link on my talk page.


 * Also, this is off topic, but sometimes I feel like Wikipedia would be better off if only registered users could edit. We'd still deal with new users, but that would be a lot better than new users and IPs. From personal experience, I would say 98% of IPs are vandals or otherwise disruptive editors, 1% are actually useful, and the other 1% mean good, but end up being disruptive. Exhibit A. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 19:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * A lot of editors agree with you about that, but it is not likely to change since the Wikimedia Foundation put it in their founding principles that registration is not to be required. I see both sides of the argument, but I tend to side with the Foundation. The main reason I lean that way is because I don't know if I would've started editing if registration was required. I started out purely reading, but every now and then I'd run across a typo and fix it. Later, I discovered vandalism and removed it. I may not have went to the trouble if I had to register. I don't know how many of our editors started the same way, but even if it helped create a handful of dedicated editors, I believe that it is worth it despite considering the thousands of anon vandals.


 * Rambling a bit here, but while I'm talking about my noob days, I'll share a bit more. Probably my last anonymous edit was to add the release of a professional wrestler. Not knowing any better, I didn't source it, so it was a BLP violation. I was properly reverted without warning but was provided an explanation in the edit summary. I read the policy and that is when I decided to create an account and learn the WP ways. I wish I remembered who the editor that did that was (or at least the wrestler so I could dig it out of the history), because now, I'd really like to thank him/her. Had they templated me, I probably would've been turned off of WP and stopped editing before really getting started. That's why I'm a bit sensitive towards newbies who mean well but screw things up and make it a point not to warn them unless they continue after an explanation in the edit summary, then on their talk page. I hope now that my positive edits have out-weighed my noob mistakes :)


 * Sorry for straying off a lot there, but since I was on my early editor days, I thought I'd share how my editing mind-set formed and give a little insight into my head :) I don't believe that I've actually shared that before. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

XTools
Is it working for you? I need to do my monthly update to edit statistics, and it's just giving me basically a blank page and saying things like my first edit being on December 31, 2099. https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Amaury&project=en.wikipedia.org Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 00:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hm. It's working on yours. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 00:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I clicked on your link right after you posted, and it didn't work. I got distracted before replying, then clicked on it again when I came back. and it worked then. Is it working for you now? Hopefully, it was just a server hiccup or something. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, now it is. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 00:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For the first time, previous information didn't change, like an increase or decrease in edits for a month. Also, looks like July has been my most productive month this year. By the way, any idea why my table of contents is appearing weirdly like it is. Hopefully it's not just me. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 01:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Very nice :) The toc is off on my screen too, but I'm not totally sure why. My best guess is that the userboxes are throwing it off somehow. Messing around with or  may help it, but, at least with my crappy formatting skills, they would probably just make it work differently, not necessarily better :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 02:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Off topic: So this happened today about a little over an hour ago. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 17:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow, that is terrible. Hope the toxic fumes didn't affect anyone... Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:08, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Lol you lives in USA and i Live in siren valley mandagucha who knows better facts if its you who knows better then i will stop editing as i spent my 26 years here in this village lol and you calling it disruptive editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haddin1530 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Calling a place "beautiful" is subjective and not a fact. This is true no matter where you live. WP:OR and WP:RS make it to where you do not have to live in an area to write about the area. What matters are reliable sources, not personal opinions. Yes, what you have been doing is disruptive. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Why did you do that?
Why did you remove my edit on "Crying"?

Everyone knows what's going on with YouTube. It has officially killed itself. And I'm crying in real life because of it. If you make money off of your videos, you're not allowed to swear or talk about anything sad anymore. Everything has to be for kids. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.89.58.120 (talk) 19:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * This is an encyclopedia, not a place to complain about another website's TOS. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to cry that are not listed in the article because it is an encyclopedia article, not a page to list things that make us cry. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 19:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit count
Your edit count link works for me, but when I try to visit mine it doesn't: https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Amaury&project=en.wikipedia.org I don't need it right now, but yeah. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 01:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Now, I'm getting a 502 Bad Gateway error for both yours and mine, so I'm guessing database issues maybe... Hopefully, they'll get it worked out soon. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 02:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It's been like this for a few days now, at least since I started checking. Weird. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 02:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Even weirder, yours is still working for me; yet mine isn't. Hm. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 02:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Definitely strange. I see that there is a post about it at WP:VPT. Nothing much has been said about what's happening though. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 02:52, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Want to take over for me?
Today's been a fun day, especially considering the fact that the events that are making today fun are still going on because IP hopping:
 * User talk:Amaury
 * Special:Contributions/Amaury
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
 * User talk:Orchomen
 * User talk:Orchomen
 * Orchomen block log

So I guess I was wrong on us relaxing. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 04:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Just an update that the fun seems to be mostly over now. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 16:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm glad that it's mostly over. Hopefully, the person will find a more productive use of their time and energy. Nice job on staying calm and collected through the ordeal. Even if he does come back, at least now you have the handy ANI and ANEW links that you can show admins so that even if they aren't aware of the history, they can get caught up quickly. Even better though, he seems to have drawn enough editor and admin attention, that it may not even be necessary :) Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 17:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

And they're still at it. Don't they have anything better to do with their lives? xD See history of The Lodge and my talk page. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 08:06, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * They are definately persistant... Hopefully, they'll find a productive use of their free time eventually... Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * *sighs* Yup. And 10—or any number—can be both a number and an amount. Silly person. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 14:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Created this on Sunday. Gives you an idea of what we've been dealing with. So hopefully we're making progress now, though if you take a look at a comment by IJBall on my talk page in the Orchomen section and its sub-sections, it really just depends as many serial sockpuppets like to go at it for a while, then get bored, and then start back up again. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 02:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Definitely persistent :/ Hopefully, they'll grow out of it soon, but unfortunately, there are some serial sockers who go for years. Maybe the range blocks will at least make it more frustrating than it's worth for him. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 03:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Re: Hwange National Park
Hie. The Hwange edit to my understanding was accurate. Why was it removed.? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigthewikieditor (talk • contribs) 13:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you look at your version of the article and see what your edits did, I think that it will be fairly obvious why I reverted. As seen in my revert, you replaced all of the "<" and ">" with "& lt;" and "& gt;". This broke the formatting for every reference in the article. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for that,but did you have to delete my intended edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigthewikieditor (talk • contribs) 16:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I must have missed it. Those changes were all that I saw (and thought that you were just test editing with WP markup). Whatever the content edit was, you are welcome to put it back in, it was not part of my reasoning for reverting. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 16:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigthewikieditor (talk • contribs) 20:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

No heading
Hello,

I wrote text completely acceptable for this topic I need it for the reputation of my company. It no need to be deleted. It;t content is appropriate to stay where is written. Please write your reply can I re write it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginasiljan (talk • contribs) 22:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not to be used for advertising. The text that you are adding is not acceptable. It is clearly advertising and spam. If you are affiliated with that company, then you have a conflict of interest and should not be writing about or linking to it. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Chishtian
Hi Apparition,

I saw that you edited this article a few times. Would you mind taking another look to ensure it is free of vandalism? I've put it on my watchlist, but I'm afraid my local knowledge is nonexistent and so I can't tell what's what. Some of the info on local government and schools looks dubious. Looking forward to your input.

Regards,

Samsara 08:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Samsara. I don't mind at all to take a look through it after-while and see if I can help, but unfortunately, I know all too well what you mean. I watch and edit a lot of South Asian articles, but my local knowledge is also very limited (to say the least). I tend to stick to the safe and easily defensible clean ups (notable people, blatant POV, copyvios, etc.). I really wish that I could do more for these articles; our editors who are knowledgeable in the area are extremely over-burdened... Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Feel free to suggest someone else who may have more of that local expertise. What I see happening to articles from this region is that they go for a long time between clean-ups and are in a dismal state in the interim. My idea in this particular case was to do something about that, but it really makes the most sense if we can get it cleaned up first. Thanks, Samsara 14:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I know what you mean. That's why I do my best to watch them, to at least help maintain the resemblance of an article until someone more knowledgeable comes along. Especially when it comes to this region, I would say is the best editor that we have at weeding out the BS and leaving a respectable article. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion. Sadly, he seems to have gone on wiki-break. Well, it can wait, but I'll be happy to be pinged by anyone that wants to look into this particular case - or others like it. Regards, Samsara 17:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 08:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)