User talk:Apple1223/AirPods

Wenyu Yang's peer review
I think the lead of the article is clear and relevant to the topic. The introductory sentence is concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. It does concise and includes information that is present in the article. The content is up-to-date and includes the information on airpods pro. The content is relevant to the topic. The tone is neutral and not overrepresented or underrepresented. It does not add an attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another. The organization is well-written and easy to read. The sources and references are well-cited and do contain current sources. Overall, I think the article is quite good.

Rwf5256's Peer Review Start I can't see any of the edits for this article - I will suggest some ideas for edits

Suggested Edits: - in the talk of the actual article, it said that the article seems to have heavy bias from the Apple Team - maybe think about how to give different viewpoints - when looking at sources, try to find sources that are reliable and current - think about adding more pictures to the article - it looks kind of empty now and could use more pictures - make sure to add neutral content that is different from the current bias found in the article - add links for the sources and make sure they work - there is a "criticism" section, think about adding a "positive aspect" section - make the "competition" section seem less biased - written poorly currently

Rwf5256's Peer Review End