User talk:Apple1223/Venmo

MaxGemm Peer Review
MaxGemm's Peer Review

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the article is relevant to the Venmo app, nothing really distracted me from the main topic

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? This article remained neutral throughout.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The majority of the article concerns the privacy of the app so the user viewpoint is overrepresented.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? All the citations are relevant to the article. The sources support the claims in the article. The main claims are with the privacy and there's sufficient references supporting that.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Most references are appropriate. There is some articles that are sourced from Venmo themselves. These sources appear to be biased.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? All the information presented seems to be up to date.