User talk:ApplePieMom

Unspecified source/license for File:TFedsArt2020.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:TFedsArt2020.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:TFeds2020Art.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:TFeds2020Art.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 16:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TalkingFedsLogo2020.png
Thanks for uploading File:TalkingFedsLogo2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:TFeds2020Art.pdf


The file File:TFeds2020Art.pdf has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-free use of logo in Harry Litman which fails WP:NFCC. Non-free logos of radio programs, TV shows, or other online media such as this are generally allowed per item 2 of WP:NFCI when they are used at the top of or in the main infobox in stand-alone articles about the show/program in question. Their non-free use, however, is much harder to justify when they are used in other articles or in other ways for the reasons given in WP:NFC. Similar to cover art like book covers and album covers, etc. (which this logo is similar to), non-free logos/cover art such as this is generally only allowed for this type of non-free use when the logo itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary; in other words, it's not sufficient to mention the podcast by name or even discuss it in a separate section, but rather the logo itself needs to be critically discussed."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Harry Litman
Hello, ApplePieMom. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Harry Litman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi ApplePieMom. I've added the above template because your account appears to be solely focused on editing content or creating content about Harry Litman. Some of your comments, like the one you posted at WP:THQ are at least giving the impression that you have an WP:APPARENTCOI. So, if you're connected to Litman in anyway personally or professionally, then please take the time to read the pages linked to in the above template (the links are blue) for reference because the more familiar you are with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines related to COI editing, the less likely you're going to find yourself having problems editing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi :, Thanks for your inquiry. I am new to Wikipedia but well versed in the guidelines including the section on COI as well as the section on Talk which states: Don’t Bite the Newcomers. I have absolutely no Conflict of Interest wp:coi with the subject Harry Litman: I have no ties with the subject. I do not work for nor have I ever met the subject, or anyone in his family or in his employ. I have not been solicited or am I being paid by anyone to contribute to Wikipedia on his or anyone’s behalf. Only as a listener of Litman’s podcast am I familiar with the subject’s work. Edits I have made are in the public domain ie print, online, tv. I contacted the subject’s company for artwork. I wanted to learn about Wikipedia editing so I chose a simple subject to begin with, something which lacked current info & which would allow me to work with artwork or a photo. I am not advertising or promoting anyone or anything. The edits I made with the intent of benefitting users of Wikipedia. But, beyond simple text editing I am utterly lost. I ended up uploading 2 extra images because I received a bot message telling me to upload one with lower resolution. My intent was to improve the article. Alas, my inexperience has resulted in a ridiculous mess & frustration on my part. Plus I have learned nothing. Perhaps, your help instead of accusations would be more appropriate. ApplePieMom (talk) 10:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)ApplePieMom —ApplePieMom
 * I wasn't accusing you of doing anything wrong. I just stated that your edits indicated an WP:APPARENTCOI; so, I was just providing you some information that I thought you might find helpful just in case that was the case. Since you say you're not connected to Litman, then that's fine. When a new account is created and starts to focus solely on one particular article is question, one of the concerns is that editor might be connected to subject of the article in some way; this is most likely why initially responded the way she did to your Teahouse question and is the reason why I added a bit more information about this to your user talk page. FWIW, Valeree is a Wikipedia administrator and she will certainly let me know if my post was inappropriate in any way.As for the image files you uploaded, the file you asked about at the Teahouse was one that you actually uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia are sister projects with their own separate policies and guidelines. The file you uploaded is being discussed at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harry Litman.webp; so, f you'd like to explain how it's licensing meets c:Commons:Licensing, then that's the place for you to do so. The editor who nominated the file for deletion is also a Wikipedia administrator who is quite experienced in file copyright matters and he wouldn't have done so if he didn't think there was a problems with the file's licensing. For reference, Commons doesn't accept fair use content of any type per c:COM:FAIR; this means you're going to have to either provide some kind of proof that you're the copyright holder of the photo/image per c:COM:OTRS or show that the copyright holder has given their consent for the photo/image to be uploaded to Commons per c:COM:OTRS. Generally, the copyright holder of a photo is the person who takes it, not the subject of the photo; so, unless you took that photo yourself, you're going to need the have the person who did email their WP:CONSENT to Wikimedia OTRS for verification purposes.As for the other file you uploaded, Wikipedia does allow some copyrighted content (like logos, etc.) to be uploaded as non-free content; however, such content is highly restricted and needs to meet Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. This policy generally allows content like copyrighted logos to be uploaded and used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the subjects they represent, but tends to not allow other types of non-free use. So, the podcast logo would almost certainly be fine if the file was being used in a stand-alone article about the podcast itself, but it's not really policy compliant (at least not the way it's being used) in an article about the podcast's host/creator. Now, if you can convince Litman to give his WP:CONSENT to upload the logo under a free license that Wikipedia or Commons accepts, then there would be no problem (from a Wikipedia image licensing standpoint) to using the logo in the Litman article.Finally, your statement Edits I have made are in the public domain ie print, online, tv. kind of indicates that you might be confusing pubic domain with publically available. "Public domain" is concept that has to do with the copyright status (actually the non-copyright eligibility) of content and it has nothing to really to do with the availability of the content itself. In fact, pretty much everything in print, online or on TV is going to be considered to be protected by copyright unless it clearly states it's not, even if it's freely available to and freely viewable by third-parties. So, even if you can download such content from some website for free, it's still almost certainly not free from copyright protection unless it clearly states that it is. There are various reasons why something might be considered to be public domain, but usually it's because the content in question is too old or too simple to be considered (or still considered) eligible for copyright protection, and none of those seem to apply to files you've uploaded.If you have any further questions image copyright, feel free to ask them below or at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, and either I or someone else will try and help you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi :, Thank you again for your notes & assistance. I can certainly understand your comments about the logo. And, I can see where the logo if cleared would be appropriate only for a stand alone about the podcast, not the creator. Will keep in mind for future. Again, I was getting my feet wet & learning. Btw: I uploaded 3 logo images ie art somewhere via Wikipedia. I did nothing with Commons. ApplePieMom (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)ApplePieMom
 * Sorry about mixing up with the uploader of File:Harry Litman.webp. I thought that was the file you were asking about at the Teahouse, but it was (as you point out) uploaded to Commons by someone else. My mistake and apologize for any confusion I might've caused. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Tutorial
Hey, APM! There's a tutorial you can take at The_Wikipedia_Adventure. —valereee (talk) 11:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)