User talk:Appleeater123

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Polytechnic Institute of New York University with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Senior Design.JPG


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dac04 (talk) 21:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Senior Design.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Senior Design.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. When you recently edited Polytechnic Institute of New York University, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Wood and SIAC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Shahbal. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shahbal - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ducknish (talk) 20:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

The Aeronuts&
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Aeronuts&, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://cable.poly.edu/issue/spring-2011/news/campus-buzz/flying-high-nyu-poly-aeronuts.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:37, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane


A tag has been placed on Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:42, 25 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I have declined the speedy deletion of this article for technical reasons, however your new article The Aeronuts' Radio-controlled aircraft uses excessive amounts of text from url=http://cable.poly.edu/issue/spring-2011/news/campus-buzz/flying-high-nyu-poly-aeronuts, which constitutes a violation of copyright. Since Wikipedia policies do not tolerate this, I have instead nominated that article for speedy deletion. Apart from that it duplicates the existing article you wrote. Please don't duplicate this topic but try to expand Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane with reliable sources that have reported about the project, such as recurring news coverage, feature articles. Regards, De728631 (talk) 21:50, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at The Aeronuts' Radio-controlled aircraft
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from The Aeronuts' Radio-controlled aircraft. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Nomination of Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Team Aeronuts’ radio-controlled plane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at The Aeronuts' Radio-controlled aircraft
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Aeronuts' Radio-controlled aircraft. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at The Aeronuts' Radio-controlled aircraft, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Reported to AIV
Hi Appleeater123, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported your removal of speedy deletion templates at The Aeronuts' Radio-controlled aircraft to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

The Aeronuts&
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, The Aeronuts&, may be copied from http://cable.poly.edu/issue/spring-2011/news/campus-buzz/flying-high-nyu-poly-aeronuts. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Aeronuts' radio-controlled aircraft


A tag has been placed on The Aeronuts' radio-controlled aircraft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Electric Catfish 00:41, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing, and attempting to evade sanctions by editing without using this account. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bioengineering Institute


A tag has been placed on Bioengineering Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 12:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Appleeater123. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Continuing problems, and block
As you know, you were warned on 26 July that you were likely to be blocked next time you created an unsuitable page. Since then, you have created two articles. One of them was a copyright infringement, and the other was a duplicate under a different title of an existing article which is currently the subject of a deletion discussion. Considering that you already had a history of creating copyright-infringing articles, you can scarcely have been unaware of the problem. I don't know why you created a second copy of an existing article, but it does look, under the circumstances, as though it may have been an attempt to evade a likely "delete" outcome of the deletion discussion. Combining these facts with the other problems with your editing, it is looking doubtful whether you are going to settle into working within the collaborative framework of Wikipedia. However, I sincerely hope that you will do so. For now, I am blocking you for just 3 days, because I do hope that will be enough time for you to read some of the pages about how Wikipedia works that are linked in the message at the top of this page, so that you can come back better equipped to edit here. In particular, I suggest that you look at the guidelines and policies concerning notability, conflict of interest, copyright, and the section Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion of the policy What Wikipedia is not. Also, please bear in mind that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and works by all of us trying to fit in with the rest of the community, not by individuals pressing ahead with their own preferred content, and ignoring other editors who raise issues about their editing. I look forward to your return from the block, in the hope that you will edit constructively, so that there is no reason for you to be blocked again. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)