User talk:Appleinthell

October 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Etyen Mahçupyan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 03:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Etyen Mahçupyan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 03:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I m sorry about those edits I made..I wasnt aware they were warnings

I thought I m doing something wrong and thats why it was nringing back the original page and I was re editing over and over until I realized that I was supposed to make a lengthy explanation for my edits. I redid them now page looks much prettier and more accurate.. Thanks Appleinthell (talk) 03:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Etyen Mahçupyan; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.   Excutient (talk) 08:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Excutient (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Etyen Mahçupyan) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 12:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Please discuss your proposed edits to the article on the article talk page first. You are still free to edit that, as well as other articles. If you agree to voluntarily stop editing the article and go to the talk page first, I would be willing to remove the block before it expires. 331dot (talk) 12:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)