User talk:Applepineapple

Unspecified source/license for File:SUSS SST logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:SUSS SST logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:01, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (SUSS School of Humanities and Behavioural Sciences) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating SUSS School of Humanities and Behavioural Sciences, Applepineapple!

Wikipedia editor Vexations just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please find other sources than the school itself"

To reply, leave a comment on Vexations's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Vexations (talk) 18:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (SUSS School of Business) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating SUSS School of Business, Applepineapple!

Wikipedia editor Vexations just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please find better sources. The school itself is not an independent source and the Straits times source is not reliable."

To reply, leave a comment on Vexations's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Vexations (talk) 18:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:S R Nathan School of Human Development.png
Thanks for uploading File:S R Nathan School of Human Development.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SIM Group logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:SIM Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Official SIM Logo.png


A tag has been placed on File:Official SIM Logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &#8209;&#8209; V. S. ( C )( T )  08:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Singapore Institute of Management Logo.png


A tag has been placed on File:Singapore Institute of Management Logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

== "Please do not paint a broad brush that Singapore Institute of Management is linked with Singapore University of Social Sciences. Under SIM there is SIM global, home to overseas reputable universities. UniSIM is a local private university with questionable standards." ==

SIM is indeed very much linked to SUSS if not the same thing. They themselves even share the SAME campus?

You mentioned that "UniSIM is a local private university with questionable standards" Just like how UniSIM is renamed to SUSS thus SUSS is a local university with questionable standards

A rename is just a cosmetic change. Internally SUSS is still UniSIM

SUSS is NOT a completely new university like SUTD or SIT

IMO there's no point adding on that UniSIM has questionable standards which is the same as how SUSS is with questionable standards as they are both the same thing less the cosmetic change in name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ignaxiouslow (talk • contribs) 14:39, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Please refer to facts on UniSIM and SUSS. I think both have questionable standards. I’m defending linking SIM to SUSS. SIM Global reputable universities should not be linked to UniSIM or SUSS. Applepineapple (talk) 04:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Singapore Institute of Technology. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello Drmies, please advise which paragraphs constituted to my opinions so that I will learn not to repeat them? Thanks. Applepineapple (talk) 15:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Look at my recent edits--it wasn't all that much, but a clear POV term was "champions" in the opening line. No worries--thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I dropped a more serious warning on User talk:Ignaxiouslow. I see you've been chatting with User:Serial Number 54129, who typically knows what he's doing. Drmies (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Employment data
Acquaint yourself with what constitutes promotional material here. If you look at Featured Articles such as Duke University and Michigan State University, they also refer to statistics on graduate employability. These numbers, like rankings, may lend to certain perceptions, but they remain facts. Of course some of the material may be written in a promotional way, but to classify any sort of favourable numbers or statistics as inexorably promotional is something else. Rangtengpa (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your input. There is currently a wave among the administrators to remove information. Im merely acting at their pleasures.


 * no, that is not how WP editing works... Manderiko (talk) 11:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Please be informed that this was already sorted by an administer than employment related information should not be included “pleasure of the administor” to sort what’s fair and objective in Wikipedia.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rangtengpa (talk • contribs) 13:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Rangtengpa, I'm about to warn you as well, for promotional editing. Applepineapple, please don't blank other people's talk pages but more importantly don't talk about some "wave" by administrators--there is no wave, and that an edit is done by an administrator doesn't make it all that special (though I'll say that generally my edits are outstanding, of course). User:Manderiko, though I don't agree with their edits, is correct: that an admin does something doesn't make it right, or policy. Moreover, it's not that simple. "Employment data" can, in some cases, be cited, if it's properly referenced, if it's important, if it's written in a neutral way. Drmies (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:S R Nathan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:S R Nathan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SIM GE Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:SIM GE Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Singapore University of Social Sciences.png
Thanks for uploading File:Singapore University of Social Sciences.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SIM Group Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:SIM Group Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SUSS NSHD Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:SUSS NSHD Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SUSS School of Law.png
Thanks for uploading File:SUSS School of Law.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SUSS SST Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:SUSS SST Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)