User talk:AppliedMathematician

Theta model
I've reverted your redirect to Theta Model as it does not meet WP:CAPS. The original version will work. Calabe1992 21:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks much --BBAmp (talk) 22:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Understanding your articles
BB, you have been creating some articles that I just can't make any sense of in the slightest. Quadratic integrate and fire and Parabolic bursting are some examples. The first one seems to clearly be a math topic, but I don't even know what the second is even about. Please try to write to provide more context for readers that aren't experts. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Looking a bit more, I'm not even sure the first article is a math topic anymore. This is almost speedy deletable as no context. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Could you give me some time to add content?? Quadratic integrate and fire is an important model in computational neuroscience and there are hundreds and hundreds of papers which use this model. If there are wikipedia articles on models like the theta model, Fitzhugh-Nagumo, and Hodgkin-Huxley, I don't know why a page for the QIF model can't exist. The wikipedia page on bursting is sparse, so I plan to add more on parabolic bursting and elliptic bursting. I created these articles so I can add content later, and they are far far far from complete. I am busy. Just give me some time.BBAmp (talk) 12:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * For the record the number of articles on computational neuroscience is pathetically small so I will be adding many many more articles which will start off like the ones you saw. However, they will be accessible to laymen with time.BBAmp (talk) 13:01, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

I saw your revised articles and they are much better, so thank you. Also, I wasn't planning on nominating them for speedy deletion, at least not without hearing from you first. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you saw an improvement. I'll continue to work on them! Thank you for the initial feedback and for clearing things up with me first :) BBAmp (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

CS1 error on Neural oscillation
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Neural oscillation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20AppliedMathematician&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1178102576 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neural_oscillation&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1178102576%7CNeural%20oscillation%5D%5D Ask for help])

October 2023
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!  Isaidnoway (talk) 05:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the trouble, and will do. It looks like I'm still missing some summaries even after trying to take your advice since last night... it'll get much better with time. AppliedMathematician (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)