User talk:Appliedict2011bissan

I noticed that all of the websites are written in good format, the logos designed in a clear way, also, all the logos are related and have a good and reasonable point. The colours in the layout and the enlargements of the font make the websites more interesting and easy to read. Hence, the websites are appropriate to all age groups which makes it safe for everyone.

Having album covers displayed in the website would make the audience more comfortable, also advertisements included would make the websites more reliable. However, the URL given is not trusted for they used networks(.net). URLs like, academic sites ( .as) and organisations (.org) are more trustful and reliable.

Graham Browely put his personal negative opinions specifically in the album "rock on" by "the fireskulls" which lack objectivity and fairness especially that he is the ex manager for the band, so he is expected to give the wrong impression. The others were talking generally about the albums, and wrote variety of comments and opinions.

The two websites are all up-to-date ( in 2011) which also increase their reliability. Mike Jones’ website is more recent for it was edited in (March 2011) compared to Graham’s which was edited in (Feb 2011). Though the other two websites don’t have a detailed date, so this means we don’t know how old the websites information is, that makes them less accurate.

Mike Jones’ website included a link in the end of the website, that has detailed information of his life whis is followed by evidence This will make it more acceptable than taking opinions that might be not true, as also mentioned in the other websites.

I have come to conclusion, that from the contents of the websites and information included, that www.rockict.net/reviews/mikejones.html is the most accepted website for advertising albums. As it is the most reliable, accurate and convincing one to me.