User talk:Aprlawclerkprog

Welcome!

Hello, Aprlawclerkprog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Korean Buddhism does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ~ RobTalk 01:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Korean Buddhism
Greetings! Sorry for reverting your edit last night without giving any Edit Summary. It must have been that it was already 2 am here, so please excuse me :-)

Anyway, the problem is that Facebook isn't considered a WP:RELIABLE source here in Wikipedia. What we need are independent secondary sources that can verify the claims. I know this can be a difficult one to fathom in the beginning, but it's not that hard after you get a hang of it. I'd suggest you to read these two core policies: WP:OR and WP:RELIABLE.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to message me. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)