User talk:Apronsoftherestricted

April 2019
Your recent editing history at List of Crips subgroups shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  General Ization Talk  16:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

You should say that to the other guy, not to me, i have more then valid information, he is editing it based on nothing, i am editing based on truth.Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 17:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Too late
I came here to warn you about your edit warring and adding unsourced material. I'm too late. I see it has already been done. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Sure were all books, and Dutch official national new but owell mister know it all, bless you Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Niteshift36. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  19:09, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Stop the nonsense generalization you know it's all well documented in the books, you did not warned him, because it fit's your agenda. He market The Traynity in Bijlmer The Netherlands[32][dubious – discuss] Dubious means= inaccurate and non factual. clearly it's stated in the damn books, what was his proof of it not being in the book, being blind.........????? you guys are a waist of time. Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC) If it's in dutch yes, see how you are talking? that shows alot what your willing to use just to justify things.Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 13:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Wait.....am I to understand that a guy who posts responses riddled with misspelled words is going to 'educate' me on what a word in a template means? Niteshift36 (talk) 12:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Who is talking about Dutch? I said a word in a template. Nobody is using Dutch templates, are they? I'm talking about the English word "dubious". I'm learning that trying to converse with you is not productive. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

am I to understand that a guy who posts responses riddled with misspelled words is going to 'educate' me on what a word i thought you meant the words within a template (website template) that can include a layout. even though the meaning is correct, so i don't see your point Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 14:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Re: (directed to me), "YOU ARE IGNORING ALL OFF THEM AND BREAKING WIKI RULES AND WILL BE REPORTED" (which, along with my warning to you about our policy concerning unsourced edits):  Please be my guest. It will save me the trouble of opening a case at WP:ANI or WP:ANEW.  However, beware the boomerang. My suggestion instead is that you start editing collaboratively and otherwise interacting with other editors civilly here, or that you stop editing. Otherwise, you are headed for a block in short order.  General Ization  Talk  15:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

This is my page.....and i din't edited nothing of yours as far im aware of, could you be more specific? Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Specifically see the links to your edits added to my comments above.  General Ization  Talk  19:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

You fail to see that i am being tagged teamed, while using the biggest dutch news paper outlet as resource, both didn't mentioned one reason why it's invalid, i mentioned multiple times that according to wiki the source was valid.... But it's pretty clear i will not get an answer,.. and you are talking about collaboration?, both of you had no grounds. My problems

A. Nightshift said first Trinity he couldn't find within the source, to only admit it later on, yet placing dubious next to it.(whole argument for nothing) His statement was When I say I don't see it in the source....it's because it's not there. B.He stated "Your beloved Eight Tray set doesn't need a history lesson. Do you see that with all the other entries?", I only said i can see it several places like: Central America Belize,Oceania Australia,Caribbean islands Grenada, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, Tulare County, Merced and so on, I can see it can you? , what does he do next? he answers with: '''BTW, your claim that Grenada, Oceania etc has a history lesson is flawed. Saying that there are gangs, but not documented subsets isn't history.'''

where do you see that claim coming from my part??, a whole bunch of back and forth, making it seem like i'm the problem, and you ignore all of this, and say i need to collaborate, be nice, i been trying, but you ignoring it doesn't make it any better. Tell me if wiki is wrong regarding this: '''News sources often contain both factual content and opinion content. News reporting from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact (though even the most reputable reporting sometimes contains errors). News reporting from less-established outlets is generally considered less reliable for statements of fact.'''

Does this mean if it came from a well-established news outlets its generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact If so you can clearly see i have not been wrong, took my time to gather resources, and all that's being done is ignoring my afford, i would like you guidance, but you should also knowledge my time and afford Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 22:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Since you insist on repeating the same incorrect summary of events, there is no point in discussing this with you. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

ignore ALL events except one then, you are using one thing to ignore the rest, creating a spiral of chaos, you are taking 3 day's just to post your opinions, but 0 collaboration regarding the questions posted on 2 pages, i asked more then 4 times the same thing and am falling in a pattern. it's clear to me i will not get an answer only personal opinions, the main reason that got us here..personal opinions, have a good day. Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 14:21, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Typos at Sumerian religion
One of your changes was in the name of an image file, which broke the link. Another editor fixed that. Both "worshipers" and "worshippers" is correct. US style guides use both and in the UK both are also acceptable. You might want to red WP:ENGVAR.

You changed "The Mesopotamians" to "The Mesopotamia's" which made no sense. Doug Weller talk 15:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Likewise, re:, in the sentence "to associate the Florida Southern art school with the more famous name of the Ringlings and their museum" at Ringling College of Art and Design, the word "Ringlings" refers to multiple members of the Ringling family; it is a plural, not a possessive usage, and so it does not include an apostrophe in English. From our previous conversations, I gather that your first language is Dutch, and your comments here and on other Talk pages demonstrate limited proficiency in English grammar. I encourage not to make changes here that require such proficiency.  General Ization Talk  16:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the nodes i see what you mean Generalization and Doug. And Gen i think most of the grammar mistakes was made in anger and frustration. No I'm Dominican/Aruban and live in the Netherlands, i speak fluent Papiamentu, Spanish, German, Dutch and English, and some Hebrew, but i see the importance of little details

Yes i seen it belonged to a file too late, thanks Apronsoftherestricted (talk) 17:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)