User talk:Apsolute-nyancat

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Book review, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Book review was changed by Apsolute-nyancat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966566 on 2012-02-22T00:16:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!


Apsolute-nyancat (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1793 was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Your book report does not belong in the references section of the article. Possible it would be useful in the rest of the article if you provide reliable sources.'' Ariconte (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Hi - Your edits are being reverted by other editors because they don't contribute to the articles. Please see the tutorial or if impatient to create an article see the article wizard.

Ariconte (talk) 00:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Help for young people.
Please also read WP:YOUNG. Thanks and enjoy Wikipedia! Regards, Ariconte (talk) 00:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of My own page


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:25, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Catsndogs
A tag has been placed on Catsndogs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
No, they emphatically do not. They are just trying to explain what you can do to make your contributions better, they are trying to help you. And no worries, Wikipedia is just another website, after all.

Lectonar (talk) 17:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Speedy deletion nomination of School of mosier


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as School of mosier, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bazj (talk) 17:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at School of mosier. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bazj (talk) 17:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)