User talk:Apwoolrich/Archive 39

Protestant Church of Wikipedia
You know you wanna join on the talk page ;-) Haha, Redwolf24 14:38, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Industrial Revolution
Just in case you missed it, you might want to look at a chunk of text that has been added three times (and removed twice) to the Industrial Revolution article. It is presently in the Causes section, and begins "From about 1100, the population of Europe rose, which is because there was recovery from the disorder in the early medieval times..." and runs to the end of the section.

It looks to me suspiciously like a school paper, stuffed, without a lot of thought, into the article. It could, I suppose, be salvaged, but this is really not my field. I thought perhaps you might see fit to clean it up, or just delete it again?

TIA, Mwanner 21:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Hello
Thanks for the welcome and the note. I'd very much like to see the searchable full text of the early editions of the Britannica online, ideally with the illustrations. I just don't know that I'll be doing it manually anytime soon ... ! I suppose I'm hoping for someone to tweak optical character recognition to better handle specific typefaces, alphabets, etc. used in these old volumes and re-scan them to a far higher degree of accuracy. I wonder what Google is doing with their new project, they have the money and talent for this, and if they will do the EB? flux.books 14:15, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Tony: Thanks for the vote of confidence. I think I would be better at copyediting than what the Wikisource project is doing, namely becuase, I don't have a scanner and I also don't have a copy of EB11 at home. I do have access to the handy edition at work. The type is small but manageable to read. I would be happy to help in other ways (see copyediting above). Let me know how you want to procede. Best regards, FeanorStar7 18:17, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

1911 EB
I'd love to help with the 1911EB project. I've moved hundreds (it seems!) from the online OCR version to Wikipedia. However, I don't have a copy of the original. I could fix some obvious things, but I'd not be able to make it final without a copy or facsimile, because, as you saw with the "Viel-Castel" thing, some stuff is so tricky to identify. But yes, I love doing this kind of editing. --DanielCD 20:37, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Chambers
Hi there ... working on Ephraim Chambers has been on my list for a while, so I'm glad I was able to improve it. I wrote a paper about the Cyclopaedia a while ago and was surprised to find how little literature there is out there on either the Cyclopaedia or Chambers -- very little is known about him and not that many people have even heard of him. I'll check the British Biographical Index though, thanks. Fixing up the Cyclopaedia article is my next task... Brassratgirl 04:34, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Hello
Category:Wikipedians born in the 1930s is up for deletion. I believe on the "by age" metawiki it says you are from the 1930s so I thought I'd mention this to you to get a sense of what, if anything, your view on it would be.--T. Anthony 06:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Wikisource
Tony, thanks for the invite to join your efforts on Wikisource. I've just created an account there (as you already know ;-) ), but I wouldn't rely on too much activity from me. My editing lately has been pretty much restricted to maintenance work here, and I'm afraid that I've let Wikipolitics suck me in, which is pretty depressing.  I'll try and rekindle some enthusiasm to make some positive contributions soon.

I have two tasks sitting in the back of my mind, that you might have the answer to, or can point me in the right direction. One is to track down the birthplace of Charles Babbage (although even his biographers seem uncertain, from the comments I've seen so far). The second (and perhaps something which has a more definite answer) is to find out what is the difference between a tilt hammer and a trip hammer. I did some hunting a while back, and there does seem to be a difference because some foundries are documented as having both, but I couldn't discern a clear definition. In my mind, it started to seem that a trip hammer was in constant operation, whereas a tilt hammer was 'on demand'. Any interest?

Finally, an apology. You left a message on my talk page some time ago regarding looking at the Industrial Revolution article after some changes that you made, and I failed to respond. I treat the internet in quite a different way than I treat interactions in real life, so I'm sure I come over as quite rude on occasion. Hope you didn't take offence. Cheers, Noisy | Talk 14:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

HisPhis
I don't know if you've come across the WikiProject_History_of_Science yet, but the project would clearly benefit from your involvement. Take a look? Cheers, JackyR 14:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Trip Hammers
Just wandering around, I saw this: ... would you consider that text for Hammer mill, perhaps sourced? That article really needs something! (I found out how barren it was when working on Redridge Steel Dam which fed a stamp mill... another name for a hammermill, I think but the hammers are used for ore extraction rather than metal forming.) + +Lar: t/c 15:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Essay & Beatrice Warde
Thank you for the kind words about the essay on my userpage; it's gratifying to know that others like what I wrote. I was unaware of the Printing Office text -- thank you so much for pointing it out to me! &mdash; Catherine\talk 22:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the lovely article on Beatrice and her contemporaries.


 * I have taken your challenge to heart. The tone ended up being quite different, but please tell me, what do you think of this?


 * I'm so glad you liked it! Share it with others, if you like.  :)


 * I have added the same formatting to the text on the Beatrice Warde page -- please let me know if it displays all right on your end. (I know Internet Explorer displays it in an ugly sans-serif font instead of that lovely Perpetua; I'm looking for an answer to that.)  I'll be happy to implement any changes you might suggest.


 * I found this example online; using the justified text with dots indicating line breaks might work better for online display (since it has to fit so many different browsers) -- what do you think? &mdash; Catherine\talk 17:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, that broadside does a LOT for the Beatrice Warde article (I am seeing it in FireFox 1.5 on Win XP). Neat.  + + Lar: t/c 18:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * :) glad you like it. Tony, if you don't like what's there, feel free to revert until you've found me a better model for me to work from -- thanks!  &mdash; Catherine\talk 18:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I am glad that my essay at an essay led to an improvement for Wikipedia; Beatrice and her contemporaries were definitely deserving of coverage! The article is really looking good now.

As for John Taylor, I just set out to write an article for John Taylor of Duran Duran, on my second day here. (I got hooked on Wikipedia because I know a lot about Duran and the article here was pretty skimpy then.) I knew there was a jazz musician, whose discography sometimes got mixed up with Duran's Taylor on various sites, so I looked around the help pages, learned the word "disambiguation", and created a page with two names on it. When some other people added names to the list, it occurred to me to do a thorough search of Wikipedia, and I found many more JTs that I added to the disambiguation page. Many of their articles were substandard, even by 2003 WP standards, so I began doing research improving them. In doing research in various sources, I found even more John Taylors who ought to have articles.

So trying to improve this one little corner of Wikipedia, I have now learned about 17th century poets and the Thames watermen's guild, pseudoscience and the pyramids, bravery under fire, underappreciated musicians, important scholars, many politicians and preachers, The Mormon Church, early baseball history, The Grauniad, pork byproduct, Velocette motorcycles, and murder, not to mention a zillion different things about how Wikipedia works. So, in short, John Taylor has been very good to me!

But please, by all means, add another to the list..... :) &mdash; Catherine\talk 20:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Second Industrial Revolution
Whatever you think needs to be done works for me, I defer to your expertise! Mostly I just thought it could've been written a little better, generally cleaned up. &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 16:21, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me -- much better job than I could've done! &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 19:40, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

Looks much better. But I am questioning the term, or its importance. I have left a note on the talk page for this article. I would suggest we talk about which historians have used the term "Second Industrial Revolution" because it doesn't seem to have such general currency, and the dates would be different in many places in the world where there was industrialization. --Metzenberg 05:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue I - March 2007
The inaugural March 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 03:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue II - May 2007
The May 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 06:12, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue III - September 2007
The September 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 00:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Conger
A tag has been placed on Conger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. jonny-mt(t)(c) 08:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This was entirely my fault. I was tracking a vandal who was spamming Wikipedia with information on his electric company.  He completely replaced Conger with the contents of another page he had created that I had marked for CSD, so I marked this one as well, thinking he had created it.  I've since realized my error and reverted the changes.  My sincere apologies for the mixup. --jonny-mt(t)(c) 08:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Spam in History of Technology (magazine)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on History of Technology (magazine), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because History of Technology (magazine) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting History of Technology (magazine), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on History of Technology (magazine), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 83.161.18.159 (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * As the review admin, I removed the tag; it's a descriptive article about the major journal in the subject. But i suggest you add some more info to the article--at the least, which indexing services cover it.  And I would appreciate it if you emailed me from my user page. DGG (talk) 18:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Engineers buried in London
Hi, I'm a Friend of West Norwood Cemetery, one of the Magnificent Seven, London, which opened in 1837. I also started out as a civ.eng, and so have a soft spot for them – in more ways than one! You'll see from my profile that we have a lot of engineers buried at WNC, and there may be others that we haven't placed yet. We have biographies for all the ones highlighted, and I plan to sort out at least a stub bio for the remainder over time. As someone who is valiantly ploughing a parallel furrow, do you know if this will be overlapping the work of the ICE's Biographies, Vol II? Ephebi (talk) 10:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue IV - May 2008
A new May 2008 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is hot off the virtual presses. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue V - January 2009
It's here at long last! The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is ready, with exciting news about Darwin Day 2009. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse --ragesoss (talk) 03:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Richard Prosser
Hi Tony,

I noticed you have contributed to the article on Richard Bissell Prosser but that there is no article for his father Richard Prosser... I wish to ask you if you know anything about him, particularly if he was born in Birmingham or elsewhere? I am interested because of his work on producing ceramic buttons.

Thanks,

Joe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeprole (talk • contribs) 16:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Rees's Cyclopædia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to James Smith, William Lawrence, William Pearson and Cyclopaedia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Rees's Cyclopædia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to William Thomson, Edward Jones, Hewitt, James Parker, Strange and Charles Knight


 * Abraham Rees (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Cyclopædia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

cyclopaedias
Of course I remember you! so nice to hear from you again. I don't know much about Rees's but am interested by it; it looks like there is a great deal of detail there already! It's such an interesting history. At any rate, it's lovely to see you editing again -- welcome back :) best, phoebe / (talk to me) 02:35, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry
I just assumed it was up for review as it was tagged, so moved it to AfC. It's no longer there anyway. I assume you're not finished with the newly created version? Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 15:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The article on William Blair currently could do with a little manual of style move to remove the comma from the title and it could do with an intro. I could give it a quick clean up if you're not currently in the process of editing it? :) Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 15:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I gave it a quick copyedit and a few tweaks. You might want to check it over to make sure I haven't accidentally made any typos or something. Also, if the Henry Meyer who did his portrait was Henry Hoppner Meyer, you could wikilink to that. :) Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 15:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * In response to your question about writing an article on W. Symonds, my advice would be: don't. It's not really within policy to have an article about someone when we're not even sure who they were! Everything needs to be sourced, and finding only one source that only notes he existed, and he contributed to something...it's not nearly enough. I know it would be lovely to have a list of all the contributors to the Cyclopaedia with nice blue links, but sometimes these things just aren't possible. Instead of a red link, I would suggest unlinking his name. Because there's really no way an article could be created about a person we have so little information about. I'm sorry! Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 18:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep, that sounds like a good alternative! Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 18:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

John Clennell
I was copy editing the page and noticed that, whilst you have included a reference for the article, you haven't linked it to anything in the main text. As the only person thusfar who has edited the page to any great degree, I was wondering if you could let me know which parts of the article are sourced from said reference so that they can be cited correctly. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Good point. I'll do it now - well in half an hour or so! Apwoolrich (talk) 13:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have also been through and copy edited said article. I don't believe any of the changes I made detract from what was originally being said, but drop me a line if you have any queries about it. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem on edits. Its good to know people look at my stuff. I've done inline citations. If you click  Rees's Cyclopaedia, then look at the contributors you will see my source for the list of contributors. Since can't  cite WP pages as references, there is no point in doing so. Apwoolrich (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed, but you have a couple of good references there so I can't really see there being any sort of problem. Incidentally, I changed the notes section to references, as that is what that section is generally named. Keep up the good work :) --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Joseph Farey
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Joseph Farey, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from A Biographical Dictionary of Civil Engineers, page 224. As a copyright violation, Joseph Farey appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Joseph Farey has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Joseph Farey and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Joseph Farey with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Joseph Farey.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 12:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * William Blair (surgeon) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Asylum, David Kahn and Cyclopedia


 * James Macartney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to John Abernethy and William Lawrence


 * Alexander Marcet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to William Saunders


 * John Landseer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Society of Antiquaries


 * Richard Watson Dickson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Warton


 * Samuel Cooper (surgeon) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Thomas Morton


 * William Woodville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to William Bond

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Contributor to Rees's Cyclopaedia, 1802-1819
Category:Contributor to Rees's Cyclopaedia, 1802-1819, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind remarks about my work. I've responded on that discussion page. Most of the fact-finding was done in the 1980's and 90s, with the view of writing an academic paper about it. I've abandoned that route following my discovery that the journal I used to write for, History of Technology, now retails at well over £100 per volume in a minute print run - and most of the Cyclopaedia contributors have pages on WP. Plus the fact that in the last couple of years the Cyclopaedia has been digitised and OCRd. By placing my material on WP there is more likely to get an input from other scholars both now and in the future than would ever come from a print publication. Kind regards Apwoolrich (talk) 07:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Thankyou for your contributions
Thankyou for your contributions. One set of categories that it is easy to put on most articles is birth and death dates (well, at least if you have such dates). Keep up the good work.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. When you recently edited John Farey, Sr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. When you recently edited William Pearson (astronomer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Simms (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Farey
Thank you! I'm keeping an eye out for it, but it hasn't come through yet. :) When it does, I'll put together a template for that article talk page which I'll also put in a user subpage for you, just to verify that your identity is confirmed. That should eliminate any future issues with copyright. If you plan to use extensively content you've written, I think it's probably a good idea to put a note with a link to the OTRS template on the talk page. It won't stop bots, but it may keep others from raising concerns later and material potentially being deleted by somebody who doesn't look closely enough.

If perchance another agent gets it first, no harm - I'll just keep looking and step in to explain, if necessary, what's going on.

Thanks again for your willingness to help out with this. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * There, then. That's done. Thank you very much. :) I've created the promised notice for you at User:Apwoolrich/Verification. If you ever want to use your own words extensively, i'd really recommend either substituting on the talk page (as I have done at Talk:Joseph_Farey) or leaving a note with a link. People can stumble upon this stuff much, much later and the default approach is to remove if they can't prove you are who you say you are. No reason to risk that. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

HighBeam: Email needed
Good news, you were approved for a free account. Bad news, your email is not set up to receive the code. Two options: 1) Go to Special:Preferences, scroll down, add your email and enable receiving messages; 2) email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and I'll respond with your code. Cheers! Ocaasit &#124; c 15:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Just for context... did you know you recently passed 1,000 edits in the mainspace? Pretty cool, eh? :) Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   18:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Encyclopædia Edinensis
Perhaps you can help. It was published in six volumes all right, but that was a dozen years after it was announced in 1815. It is obvious that there was a part-published version first. I haven't been able to turn up a clear reference to when that started, though.

Of the contributors, not so many seem obviously notable. I have a draft for William Galbraith (mathematician), which doesn't need much work now. Apart from that I don't hold out much hope. But you might have something more. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Long articles in Rees's Cyclopaedia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Long articles in Rees's Cyclopaedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Long articles in Rees's Cyclopaedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  KoshVorlon . Angeli i demoni krushili nado mnoj...   16:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi! I trust you didn't do all the work of finding the 15-column entries yourself (I saw "Willism" misscanned)?! If another source did some or all of the work that would be very helpful for knowing at AFD. Also, I recommend we add to the inclusion criterion the idea of "articles mentioned in at least one secondary RS". (Later on the 15-column minimum might be removed and the nonsecondary articles delisted; or maybe not.) JJB 23:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

JSTOR
Hi there. You're one of the first 100 people to sign up for a free JSTOR account via the requests page. We're ready to start handing out accounts, if you'd still like one.

JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swalling@undefinedwikimedia.org) with...


 * the subject line "JSTOR"
 * your English Wikipedia username
 * your preferred email address for a JSTOR account

The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so by November 30th or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. If you don't meet that deadline, we will assume you have lost interest, and will provide an account to the next person in the rather long waitlist.

Thank you! Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   21:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your work
Your having responded to my talk-page post on Rees's Cyclopædia led me to see that you were the one who did so much of the incredible work on that overlooked reference work. I wanted to convey my sincerest thanks, as that article and all the wikilinks and external links in it has served as a springboard for improving other articles, especially ones on traditional, old, or "obsolete" technologies, such as optical telegraphy, Hawkin's polygraph writing machine, wagons, and cider mills, as well as ideas for a number not yet made. It's quite a treasure trove of information on technology as it existed towards the end of the first Industrial Revolution. I'm presently working on cleaning up and uploading quite a number of images from the plates to illustrate the relevant pages of those topics. Again, thank you for all your work in bringing this great work to light! Morgan Riley (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Joseph Booth and textiles
Maybe one for you. I have just created Joseph Booth (actor), which concentrates on the "polygraphic art" (which is still being researched, see the link on the talk page to a 2010 MPhil). I have just run across a Rees's C. reference to Booth. That's in the "Woollen Manufacture" article by Hebert, and I see that this contributor is not yet identified.

I'd concur with the thread above: it's a great thing to have this material about the Cyclopædia here. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Could be Luke Hebert, I suppose, if the dates permit. Since The Engineer's and Mechanic's Encyclopaedia is one of your article starts, you might have ruled him out. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Philip Taylor (civil engineer)
Another possible for you. The brother John Taylor (civil engineer) is a Rees contributor. The Philip Taylor article is based on the DNB, but the time in the UK is much foreshortened. I can see the reason, which is that it was written for the DNB by Alger, who was an expert on matters French instead.

There is fairly clearly a period 1812 to 1826 (when the British Iron Company went through a rocky patch) where the Taylor brothers were doing innovative things in chemistry. The interest in steam spilled over into steam engine design. I hope to improve the article with the aid of a couple of books, but it is apparently complicated with several enterprises involved. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Factory visits
I'm nearly finished (I hope!) with upgrading Charles Babbage, to reflect his whole range of interests. See the talk page there for my motivation to spend time on just one long article. One thing that came up was his factory visits. I redirected to factory tour, a feeble article. But I thought it might be revealing to trace the early history of visits to factories in the 19th century, at least. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of contributors to Rees's Cyclopædia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Lawrence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Rees's En
Hi Ap - very interested in your work. Please keep me in the loop re any developments.  Granitethighs  20:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Alexander Jamieson
I wondered if you had come across him. A volume of his Dictionary of Mechanical Arts is on Google Books. From the introduction in it, he is the same person as the schoolmaster and LL. D. at Wyke House, which is where he comes up for me. The Thoemmes Dictionary of Nineteenth Century Philosophers has an article about Alexander Jamieson LL.D. fl. 1818, saying "nothing is known about the life" of Jamieson, the author of A Grammar of Logic and Intellectual Philosophy ( is an American edition). There is also an amateur astronomer of the same name; and a few ODNB hits. It is tempting to assume this is all one person.

That the Thoemmes Dictionary person is the schoolmaster and writer of the Dictionary of Mechanical Arts is fairly clear from this title page of the Universal Science Or the Cabinet of Nature and Art (1821). Charles Matthews (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Progress: the author of the Geography and Elementary Astronomy is the author of the Celestial Atlas,, Alexander Jamieson A.M., so really must be one person. I'll draft something, because there is quite enough on him as rhetorician to make for notability. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages
 * -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 22:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)
Books & Bytes Sign up for monthly delivery Welcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world. Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations... Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...  Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...  Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...   Read Books & Bytes , 16:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Old Jewry Meeting-house
Of possible interest to you. An image of the original place would of course be nice. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Henry Langdon Childe
I wondered whether this was really up your street, but when the Adelaide Gallery turned up I thought it probably was. I believe there is quite a lot of disinformation around, and I don't think the old DNB is trustworthy in this case. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 4
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014 News for February from your Wikipedia Library. Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

JSTOR Survey (and an update)
Hi! Just a quick update that while JSTOR and The Wikipedia Library discuss expanding the partnership, they've gone ahead and extended the pilot access again, until May 31st. Thanks, JSTOR!

It would be really helpful for growing the program if you would fill out this short survey about your usage and experience with JSTOR:

SURVEY

Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 5
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 5, March 2014 by ,

 Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * New Visiting Scholar positions
 * TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program
 * Australian articles get a link to librarians
 * Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia"

Books & Bytes, Issue 6
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 6, April-May 2014 by ,

 Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK)
 * TWL does Vegas: American Library Association Annual plans
 * TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns
 * New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Wikipedia Visiting Scholar news, and more

The Wikipedia Library: New Account Coordinators Needed
Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitz@undefinedgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear Tony,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, —  Scott  •  talk  21:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

BNA & Blake Museum
Hi, Thanks for your message. The Times was just an example & I will investigate through Somerset libraries, but I'm sure other papers would be useful. I started the Blake Museum article (back in 2007) as there wasn't one, but when I went to visit & took the photo it was closed so I've never been inside, but still hope to visit one day. I'm sure it could still be improved if you fancied collaborating on it (obviously taking into account any COI).&mdash; Rod talk 06:49, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of biographies of musicians in Rees's Cyclopaedia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of biographies of musicians in Rees's Cyclopaedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of biographies of musicians in Rees's Cyclopaedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 16:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Please fill out your JSTOR email
As one of the original 100 JSTOR account recipients, please fill out the very short email form you received just recently in order to renew your access. Even though you signed up before with WMF, we need you to sign up again with The Wikipedia Library for privacy reasons and because your prior access expired on July 15th. We do not have your email addresses now; we just used the Special:EmailUser feature, so if you didn't receive an email just contact me directly at jorlowitz@undefinedgmail.com. Thanks, and we're working as quickly as possible to get you your new access! Jake (Ocaasi) 19:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 7
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 7, June-July 2014 by, ,

 Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Seven new donations, two expanded partnerships
 * TWL's Final Report up, read the summary
 * Adventures in Las Vegas, WikiConference USA, and updates from TWL coordinators
 * Spotlight: Blog post on BNA's impact on one editor's research

Protestant Church of Wikipedia
You know you wanna join on the talk page ;-) Haha, Redwolf24 14:38, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Industrial Revolution
Just in case you missed it, you might want to look at a chunk of text that has been added three times (and removed twice) to the Industrial Revolution article. It is presently in the Causes section, and begins "From about 1100, the population of Europe rose, which is because there was recovery from the disorder in the early medieval times..." and runs to the end of the section.

It looks to me suspiciously like a school paper, stuffed, without a lot of thought, into the article. It could, I suppose, be salvaged, but this is really not my field. I thought perhaps you might see fit to clean it up, or just delete it again?

TIA, Mwanner 21:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Hello
Thanks for the welcome and the note. I'd very much like to see the searchable full text of the early editions of the Britannica online, ideally with the illustrations. I just don't know that I'll be doing it manually anytime soon ... ! I suppose I'm hoping for someone to tweak optical character recognition to better handle specific typefaces, alphabets, etc. used in these old volumes and re-scan them to a far higher degree of accuracy. I wonder what Google is doing with their new project, they have the money and talent for this, and if they will do the EB? flux.books 14:15, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Tony: Thanks for the vote of confidence. I think I would be better at copyediting than what the Wikisource project is doing, namely becuase, I don't have a scanner and I also don't have a copy of EB11 at home. I do have access to the handy edition at work. The type is small but manageable to read. I would be happy to help in other ways (see copyediting above). Let me know how you want to procede. Best regards, FeanorStar7 18:17, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

1911 EB
I'd love to help with the 1911EB project. I've moved hundreds (it seems!) from the online OCR version to Wikipedia. However, I don't have a copy of the original. I could fix some obvious things, but I'd not be able to make it final without a copy or facsimile, because, as you saw with the "Viel-Castel" thing, some stuff is so tricky to identify. But yes, I love doing this kind of editing. --DanielCD 20:37, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Chambers
Hi there ... working on Ephraim Chambers has been on my list for a while, so I'm glad I was able to improve it. I wrote a paper about the Cyclopaedia a while ago and was surprised to find how little literature there is out there on either the Cyclopaedia or Chambers -- very little is known about him and not that many people have even heard of him. I'll check the British Biographical Index though, thanks. Fixing up the Cyclopaedia article is my next task... Brassratgirl 04:34, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Hello
Category:Wikipedians born in the 1930s is up for deletion. I believe on the "by age" metawiki it says you are from the 1930s so I thought I'd mention this to you to get a sense of what, if anything, your view on it would be.--T. Anthony 06:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Wikisource
Tony, thanks for the invite to join your efforts on Wikisource. I've just created an account there (as you already know ;-) ), but I wouldn't rely on too much activity from me. My editing lately has been pretty much restricted to maintenance work here, and I'm afraid that I've let Wikipolitics suck me in, which is pretty depressing.  I'll try and rekindle some enthusiasm to make some positive contributions soon.

I have two tasks sitting in the back of my mind, that you might have the answer to, or can point me in the right direction. One is to track down the birthplace of Charles Babbage (although even his biographers seem uncertain, from the comments I've seen so far). The second (and perhaps something which has a more definite answer) is to find out what is the difference between a tilt hammer and a trip hammer. I did some hunting a while back, and there does seem to be a difference because some foundries are documented as having both, but I couldn't discern a clear definition. In my mind, it started to seem that a trip hammer was in constant operation, whereas a tilt hammer was 'on demand'. Any interest?

Finally, an apology. You left a message on my talk page some time ago regarding looking at the Industrial Revolution article after some changes that you made, and I failed to respond. I treat the internet in quite a different way than I treat interactions in real life, so I'm sure I come over as quite rude on occasion. Hope you didn't take offence. Cheers, Noisy | Talk 14:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

HisPhis
I don't know if you've come across the WikiProject_History_of_Science yet, but the project would clearly benefit from your involvement. Take a look? Cheers, JackyR 14:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Trip Hammers
Just wandering around, I saw this: ... would you consider that text for Hammer mill, perhaps sourced? That article really needs something! (I found out how barren it was when working on Redridge Steel Dam which fed a stamp mill... another name for a hammermill, I think but the hammers are used for ore extraction rather than metal forming.) + +Lar: t/c 15:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Essay & Beatrice Warde
Thank you for the kind words about the essay on my userpage; it's gratifying to know that others like what I wrote. I was unaware of the Printing Office text -- thank you so much for pointing it out to me! &mdash; Catherine\talk 22:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the lovely article on Beatrice and her contemporaries.


 * I have taken your challenge to heart. The tone ended up being quite different, but please tell me, what do you think of this?


 * I'm so glad you liked it! Share it with others, if you like.  :)


 * I have added the same formatting to the text on the Beatrice Warde page -- please let me know if it displays all right on your end. (I know Internet Explorer displays it in an ugly sans-serif font instead of that lovely Perpetua; I'm looking for an answer to that.)  I'll be happy to implement any changes you might suggest.


 * I found this example online; using the justified text with dots indicating line breaks might work better for online display (since it has to fit so many different browsers) -- what do you think? &mdash; Catherine\talk 17:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, that broadside does a LOT for the Beatrice Warde article (I am seeing it in FireFox 1.5 on Win XP). Neat.  + + Lar: t/c 18:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * :) glad you like it. Tony, if you don't like what's there, feel free to revert until you've found me a better model for me to work from -- thanks!  &mdash; Catherine\talk 18:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I am glad that my essay at an essay led to an improvement for Wikipedia; Beatrice and her contemporaries were definitely deserving of coverage! The article is really looking good now.

As for John Taylor, I just set out to write an article for John Taylor of Duran Duran, on my second day here. (I got hooked on Wikipedia because I know a lot about Duran and the article here was pretty skimpy then.) I knew there was a jazz musician, whose discography sometimes got mixed up with Duran's Taylor on various sites, so I looked around the help pages, learned the word "disambiguation", and created a page with two names on it. When some other people added names to the list, it occurred to me to do a thorough search of Wikipedia, and I found many more JTs that I added to the disambiguation page. Many of their articles were substandard, even by 2003 WP standards, so I began doing research improving them. In doing research in various sources, I found even more John Taylors who ought to have articles.

So trying to improve this one little corner of Wikipedia, I have now learned about 17th century poets and the Thames watermen's guild, pseudoscience and the pyramids, bravery under fire, underappreciated musicians, important scholars, many politicians and preachers, The Mormon Church, early baseball history, The Grauniad, pork byproduct, Velocette motorcycles, and murder, not to mention a zillion different things about how Wikipedia works. So, in short, John Taylor has been very good to me!

But please, by all means, add another to the list..... :) &mdash; Catherine\talk 20:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Second Industrial Revolution
Whatever you think needs to be done works for me, I defer to your expertise! Mostly I just thought it could've been written a little better, generally cleaned up. &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 16:21, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me -- much better job than I could've done! &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 19:40, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)

Looks much better. But I am questioning the term, or its importance. I have left a note on the talk page for this article. I would suggest we talk about which historians have used the term "Second Industrial Revolution" because it doesn't seem to have such general currency, and the dates would be different in many places in the world where there was industrialization. --Metzenberg 05:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue I - March 2007
The inaugural March 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 03:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue II - May 2007
The May 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 06:12, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue III - September 2007
The September 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 00:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Conger
A tag has been placed on Conger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. jonny-mt(t)(c) 08:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This was entirely my fault. I was tracking a vandal who was spamming Wikipedia with information on his electric company.  He completely replaced Conger with the contents of another page he had created that I had marked for CSD, so I marked this one as well, thinking he had created it.  I've since realized my error and reverted the changes.  My sincere apologies for the mixup. --jonny-mt(t)(c) 08:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Spam in History of Technology (magazine)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on History of Technology (magazine), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because History of Technology (magazine) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting History of Technology (magazine), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on History of Technology (magazine), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 83.161.18.159 (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * As the review admin, I removed the tag; it's a descriptive article about the major journal in the subject. But i suggest you add some more info to the article--at the least, which indexing services cover it.  And I would appreciate it if you emailed me from my user page. DGG (talk) 18:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Engineers buried in London
Hi, I'm a Friend of West Norwood Cemetery, one of the Magnificent Seven, London, which opened in 1837. I also started out as a civ.eng, and so have a soft spot for them – in more ways than one! You'll see from my profile that we have a lot of engineers buried at WNC, and there may be others that we haven't placed yet. We have biographies for all the ones highlighted, and I plan to sort out at least a stub bio for the remainder over time. As someone who is valiantly ploughing a parallel furrow, do you know if this will be overlapping the work of the ICE's Biographies, Vol II? Ephebi (talk) 10:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue IV - May 2008
A new May 2008 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is hot off the virtual presses. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue V - January 2009
It's here at long last! The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is ready, with exciting news about Darwin Day 2009. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse --ragesoss (talk) 03:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Richard Prosser
Hi Tony,

I noticed you have contributed to the article on Richard Bissell Prosser but that there is no article for his father Richard Prosser... I wish to ask you if you know anything about him, particularly if he was born in Birmingham or elsewhere? I am interested because of his work on producing ceramic buttons.

Thanks,

Joe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeprole (talk • contribs) 16:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Rees's Cyclopædia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to James Smith, William Lawrence, William Pearson and Cyclopaedia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Rees's Cyclopædia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to William Thomson, Edward Jones, Hewitt, James Parker, Strange and Charles Knight


 * Abraham Rees (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Cyclopædia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

cyclopaedias
Of course I remember you! so nice to hear from you again. I don't know much about Rees's but am interested by it; it looks like there is a great deal of detail there already! It's such an interesting history. At any rate, it's lovely to see you editing again -- welcome back :) best, phoebe / (talk to me) 02:35, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry
I just assumed it was up for review as it was tagged, so moved it to AfC. It's no longer there anyway. I assume you're not finished with the newly created version? Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 15:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The article on William Blair currently could do with a little manual of style move to remove the comma from the title and it could do with an intro. I could give it a quick clean up if you're not currently in the process of editing it? :) Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 15:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I gave it a quick copyedit and a few tweaks. You might want to check it over to make sure I haven't accidentally made any typos or something. Also, if the Henry Meyer who did his portrait was Henry Hoppner Meyer, you could wikilink to that. :) Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 15:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * In response to your question about writing an article on W. Symonds, my advice would be: don't. It's not really within policy to have an article about someone when we're not even sure who they were! Everything needs to be sourced, and finding only one source that only notes he existed, and he contributed to something...it's not nearly enough. I know it would be lovely to have a list of all the contributors to the Cyclopaedia with nice blue links, but sometimes these things just aren't possible. Instead of a red link, I would suggest unlinking his name. Because there's really no way an article could be created about a person we have so little information about. I'm sorry! Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 18:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep, that sounds like a good alternative! Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 18:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

John Clennell
I was copy editing the page and noticed that, whilst you have included a reference for the article, you haven't linked it to anything in the main text. As the only person thusfar who has edited the page to any great degree, I was wondering if you could let me know which parts of the article are sourced from said reference so that they can be cited correctly. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Good point. I'll do it now - well in half an hour or so! Apwoolrich (talk) 13:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have also been through and copy edited said article. I don't believe any of the changes I made detract from what was originally being said, but drop me a line if you have any queries about it. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem on edits. Its good to know people look at my stuff. I've done inline citations. If you click  Rees's Cyclopaedia, then look at the contributors you will see my source for the list of contributors. Since can't  cite WP pages as references, there is no point in doing so. Apwoolrich (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed, but you have a couple of good references there so I can't really see there being any sort of problem. Incidentally, I changed the notes section to references, as that is what that section is generally named. Keep up the good work :) --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Joseph Farey
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Joseph Farey, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from A Biographical Dictionary of Civil Engineers, page 224. As a copyright violation, Joseph Farey appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Joseph Farey has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Joseph Farey and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Joseph Farey with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Joseph Farey.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 12:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * William Blair (surgeon) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Asylum, David Kahn and Cyclopedia


 * James Macartney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to John Abernethy and William Lawrence


 * Alexander Marcet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to William Saunders


 * John Landseer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Society of Antiquaries


 * Richard Watson Dickson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Warton


 * Samuel Cooper (surgeon) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Thomas Morton


 * William Woodville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to William Bond

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Contributor to Rees's Cyclopaedia, 1802-1819
Category:Contributor to Rees's Cyclopaedia, 1802-1819, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind remarks about my work. I've responded on that discussion page. Most of the fact-finding was done in the 1980's and 90s, with the view of writing an academic paper about it. I've abandoned that route following my discovery that the journal I used to write for, History of Technology, now retails at well over £100 per volume in a minute print run - and most of the Cyclopaedia contributors have pages on WP. Plus the fact that in the last couple of years the Cyclopaedia has been digitised and OCRd. By placing my material on WP there is more likely to get an input from other scholars both now and in the future than would ever come from a print publication. Kind regards Apwoolrich (talk) 07:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Thankyou for your contributions
Thankyou for your contributions. One set of categories that it is easy to put on most articles is birth and death dates (well, at least if you have such dates). Keep up the good work.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. When you recently edited John Farey, Sr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. When you recently edited William Pearson (astronomer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Simms (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Farey
Thank you! I'm keeping an eye out for it, but it hasn't come through yet. :) When it does, I'll put together a template for that article talk page which I'll also put in a user subpage for you, just to verify that your identity is confirmed. That should eliminate any future issues with copyright. If you plan to use extensively content you've written, I think it's probably a good idea to put a note with a link to the OTRS template on the talk page. It won't stop bots, but it may keep others from raising concerns later and material potentially being deleted by somebody who doesn't look closely enough.

If perchance another agent gets it first, no harm - I'll just keep looking and step in to explain, if necessary, what's going on.

Thanks again for your willingness to help out with this. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * There, then. That's done. Thank you very much. :) I've created the promised notice for you at User:Apwoolrich/Verification. If you ever want to use your own words extensively, i'd really recommend either substituting on the talk page (as I have done at Talk:Joseph_Farey) or leaving a note with a link. People can stumble upon this stuff much, much later and the default approach is to remove if they can't prove you are who you say you are. No reason to risk that. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

HighBeam: Email needed
Good news, you were approved for a free account. Bad news, your email is not set up to receive the code. Two options: 1) Go to Special:Preferences, scroll down, add your email and enable receiving messages; 2) email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and I'll respond with your code. Cheers! Ocaasit &#124; c 15:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Just for context... did you know you recently passed 1,000 edits in the mainspace? Pretty cool, eh? :) Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   18:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Encyclopædia Edinensis
Perhaps you can help. It was published in six volumes all right, but that was a dozen years after it was announced in 1815. It is obvious that there was a part-published version first. I haven't been able to turn up a clear reference to when that started, though.

Of the contributors, not so many seem obviously notable. I have a draft for William Galbraith (mathematician), which doesn't need much work now. Apart from that I don't hold out much hope. But you might have something more. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Long articles in Rees's Cyclopaedia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Long articles in Rees's Cyclopaedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Long articles in Rees's Cyclopaedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  KoshVorlon . Angeli i demoni krushili nado mnoj...   16:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi! I trust you didn't do all the work of finding the 15-column entries yourself (I saw "Willism" misscanned)?! If another source did some or all of the work that would be very helpful for knowing at AFD. Also, I recommend we add to the inclusion criterion the idea of "articles mentioned in at least one secondary RS". (Later on the 15-column minimum might be removed and the nonsecondary articles delisted; or maybe not.) JJB 23:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

JSTOR
Hi there. You're one of the first 100 people to sign up for a free JSTOR account via the requests page. We're ready to start handing out accounts, if you'd still like one.

JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swalling@undefinedwikimedia.org) with...


 * the subject line "JSTOR"
 * your English Wikipedia username
 * your preferred email address for a JSTOR account

The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so by November 30th or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. If you don't meet that deadline, we will assume you have lost interest, and will provide an account to the next person in the rather long waitlist.

Thank you! <span style="font-family:Georgia, serif;">Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   21:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your work
Your having responded to my talk-page post on Rees's Cyclopædia led me to see that you were the one who did so much of the incredible work on that overlooked reference work. I wanted to convey my sincerest thanks, as that article and all the wikilinks and external links in it has served as a springboard for improving other articles, especially ones on traditional, old, or "obsolete" technologies, such as optical telegraphy, Hawkin's polygraph writing machine, wagons, and cider mills, as well as ideas for a number not yet made. It's quite a treasure trove of information on technology as it existed towards the end of the first Industrial Revolution. I'm presently working on cleaning up and uploading quite a number of images from the plates to illustrate the relevant pages of those topics. Again, thank you for all your work in bringing this great work to light! Morgan Riley (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Joseph Booth and textiles
Maybe one for you. I have just created Joseph Booth (actor), which concentrates on the "polygraphic art" (which is still being researched, see the link on the talk page to a 2010 MPhil). I have just run across a Rees's C. reference to Booth. That's in the "Woollen Manufacture" article by Hebert, and I see that this contributor is not yet identified.

I'd concur with the thread above: it's a great thing to have this material about the Cyclopædia here. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Could be Luke Hebert, I suppose, if the dates permit. Since The Engineer's and Mechanic's Encyclopaedia is one of your article starts, you might have ruled him out. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Philip Taylor (civil engineer)
Another possible for you. The brother John Taylor (civil engineer) is a Rees contributor. The Philip Taylor article is based on the DNB, but the time in the UK is much foreshortened. I can see the reason, which is that it was written for the DNB by Alger, who was an expert on matters French instead.

There is fairly clearly a period 1812 to 1826 (when the British Iron Company went through a rocky patch) where the Taylor brothers were doing innovative things in chemistry. The interest in steam spilled over into steam engine design. I hope to improve the article with the aid of a couple of books, but it is apparently complicated with several enterprises involved. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Factory visits
I'm nearly finished (I hope!) with upgrading Charles Babbage, to reflect his whole range of interests. See the talk page there for my motivation to spend time on just one long article. One thing that came up was his factory visits. I redirected to factory tour, a feeble article. But I thought it might be revealing to trace the early history of visits to factories in the 19th century, at least. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of contributors to Rees's Cyclopædia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Lawrence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Rees's En
Hi Ap - very interested in your work. Please keep me in the loop re any developments.  Granitethighs  20:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Alexander Jamieson
I wondered if you had come across him. A volume of his Dictionary of Mechanical Arts is on Google Books. From the introduction in it, he is the same person as the schoolmaster and LL. D. at Wyke House, which is where he comes up for me. The Thoemmes Dictionary of Nineteenth Century Philosophers has an article about Alexander Jamieson LL.D. fl. 1818, saying "nothing is known about the life" of Jamieson, the author of A Grammar of Logic and Intellectual Philosophy ( is an American edition). There is also an amateur astronomer of the same name; and a few ODNB hits. It is tempting to assume this is all one person.

That the Thoemmes Dictionary person is the schoolmaster and writer of the Dictionary of Mechanical Arts is fairly clear from this title page of the Universal Science Or the Cabinet of Nature and Art (1821). Charles Matthews (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Progress: the author of the Geography and Elementary Astronomy is the author of the Celestial Atlas,, Alexander Jamieson A.M., so really must be one person. I'll draft something, because there is quite enough on him as rhetorician to make for notability. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages
 * -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 22:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)
Books & Bytes Sign up for monthly delivery Welcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world. Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations... Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...  Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...  Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...   Read Books & Bytes , 16:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Old Jewry Meeting-house
Of possible interest to you. An image of the original place would of course be nice. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Henry Langdon Childe
I wondered whether this was really up your street, but when the Adelaide Gallery turned up I thought it probably was. I believe there is quite a lot of disinformation around, and I don't think the old DNB is trustworthy in this case. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 4
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014 News for February from your Wikipedia Library. Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

JSTOR Survey (and an update)
Hi! Just a quick update that while JSTOR and The Wikipedia Library discuss expanding the partnership, they've gone ahead and extended the pilot access again, until May 31st. Thanks, JSTOR!

It would be really helpful for growing the program if you would fill out this short survey about your usage and experience with JSTOR:

SURVEY

Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 5
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 5, March 2014 by ,

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * New Visiting Scholar positions
 * TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program
 * Australian articles get a link to librarians
 * Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia"

Books & Bytes, Issue 6
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 6, April-May 2014 by ,

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK)
 * TWL does Vegas: American Library Association Annual plans
 * TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns
 * New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Wikipedia Visiting Scholar news, and more

The Wikipedia Library: New Account Coordinators Needed
Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitz@undefinedgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear Tony,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, —  Scott  •  talk  21:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

BNA & Blake Museum
Hi, Thanks for your message. The Times was just an example & I will investigate through Somerset libraries, but I'm sure other papers would be useful. I started the Blake Museum article (back in 2007) as there wasn't one, but when I went to visit & took the photo it was closed so I've never been inside, but still hope to visit one day. I'm sure it could still be improved if you fancied collaborating on it (obviously taking into account any COI).&mdash; Rod talk 06:49, 23 June 2014 (UTC)