User talk:Aqswdefrgthyjukilopjmhngbfvdcsxazaqdyujvsxxv

December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Deborah Knight, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 01:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Deborah Knight. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LibStar (talk) 01:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Deborah Knight shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LibStar (talk) 01:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The material was tagged as being unsourced months ago. You are restoring it complete with the citation needed tags. It has been removed and cannot go back in until it is properly sourced. Meters (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 02:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Aqswdefrgthyjukilopjmhngbfvdcsxazaqdyujvsxxv", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is so long it prevents easy communication with other editors. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 01:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Guyguyguyguyguyguyguyguy. Thank you.  livelikemusic    talk!  02:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Deborah Knight. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. slakr \ talk / 02:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)