User talk:Aquarius19983

Feedback dashboard response
(View the feedback)

Excirial Wikipedia is, and never was, intended as a reliable source on its own. Instead article's are written on the basis of external reliable sources. Since Wikipedia is editable by anymore it is often not allowed to cite Wikipedia directly; Instead you should use the article's as a basis for understanding, and use the underlying reliable sources as the basis for your own works.

In response to your feedback
Please see General disclaimer - which is linked at the bottom of every page. We also have an article, Reliability of Wikipedia.

 Chzz  ► 18:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
If you are responding to a message left at your talk page, you are more likely to get a response by writing on that page than by writing it on the Feedback dashboard, since the editors who wrote on your talk page are probably watching it. Speaking of which, if you want to keep an eye on an article ("monitor" it) you can add it to your watchlist by clicking on the star at the top of the page. After you do that, you can see the changes to the page at Special:Watchlist or by clicking on the "My watchlist" link at the top of the page. See Help:Watching pages for more information on that. If you want to edit a page, you can do so by clicking the "edit" link on the page.

Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
I'm sorry your sister got an F on her report. For future reference, the best way to use Wikipedia is as a starting point for research--to get a general idea about a topic. Next, you should go to the reliable sources that are hopefully used as references in the Wikipedia article. These references are where you should get your information for academic work.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:38, 16 December 2011 (UTC)