User talk:Aquarpio

Spelling
Hi - since Joan Sutherland is Australian, our way of spelling is used in the article as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style - National varieties of English - hence I have reverted your edit. Regards--Matilda talk 21:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

January 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. &oelig; &trade; 01:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Cindy Herron
There is no confusion between that Cindy Herron and EV's Cindy Ann Herron-Braggs of Woodland Hills, CA. My edits are correct. I've done proper research in entertainment media sections, and more importantly in legal records. Legal records for that Cindy Herron already establish her to be deceased in April 2007 and it's been like that for nearly 3 years. Legal records show Cindy Ann Herron-Braggs of En Vogue is stated to be born on September 26, 1961 and is currently 48 years old. This same 48 year old Cindy Ann is listed to be residing with 47 year-old Glenn Braggs of an address in 91364, Woodland Hills, CA. She also was interviewed in March 1982, with a young photograph of herself and the cast of Up & Coming. This article stated in the April 6, 1982 issue of the Baltimore Afro-American newspaper, she was a recent graduate of San Francisco's Balboa High School by a few years. At that time the class of 1982 comprised of students born in 1963 and 1964, who would be in class for the final spring semester ending in May-June. Someone born in late September 1965 would be merely a junior or possibly a sophomore, not a recent graduate. She likely graduated between 1979 or 1980. For that reason, she certainly isn't 44 and what I wrote is correct. She has been lying about her age and in some circumstances, keeping mum about it. Unless you have concrete proof about that, please don't revert it again.Carmaker1 (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Cindy Herron-Age
I believe you are confused kid, not me. You are only basing what you believe Cindy Ann Herron-Braggs' legal age to be on your personal opinion and a fansite, not researched facts. I've established that edit by already 3 publicly accessible legitimate sources linking her to husband, Glenn Braggs. If you revert that to 1965 again, I will have no choice, but to report you as it's not credible.Carmaker1 (talk) 06:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Sock puppeting
I know you are intentionally undoing edits that relate to Cindy Ann Herron's correct DOB of 9/26/61 by using "anonymous" I.P. addresses. I am very aware you doing this from both Uvalda and Fitzgerald, Georgia. If anything I will report you for both vandalism and uncivil conduct to administrators for trying initiate edit wars on false information provided by you. This site is to provide the public accurate information, not opinionated beliefs. Carmaker1 (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism and Sock Puppetry
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. After these reverts you made again under this [ User :75.91.69.24 I.P.], you are now being reported to administrators for sock puppetry and vandalism. You have been using several other I.P.s to make changes to the same articles in attempts to confuse editors against your genuine identity. You have been warned sufficiently and have failed to heed the warnings given to you. Carmaker1 (talk) 01:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

LAST WARNING
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your continued removals won't be allowed!Carmaker1 (talk) 04:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)