User talk:Aquilamedia

 Hello Aquilamedia, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  
 * We hope you enjoy the collaborative nature of our encyclopedia and want to stay.
 * As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
 * We value all of our editors higly and believe that Editors Matter!
 * You can ask questions at the New Contributor's Help Page or even at the Village Pump.
 * Alternatively, you can feel free to ask any questions on my talk page; I'm always happy to help.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

 A Few Personal Recommendations:


 * Take comments in the best possible light.
 * Maintain an unbiased, neutral writing style.


 * Note our use (or non-use) of precedent.
 * All that said, be bold in editing Wikipedia!

 About Wikipedia and Contributing:


 * Wikipedia's 5 Pillars — Wikipedia's foundation
 * The Simplified Ruleset — Wikipedia's "rules" summary
 * Contributing to Wikipedia — How you can help guide
 * Questions — Where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet — Wikipedia mark-up coding guide
 * Referencing — How to use the citation tags
 * Table of Contents — Searching and Browsing
 * Department Directory — Wikipedia by Department


 * Introduction
 * Our notability guidelines
 * The need for reliable sources
 * Verifiability is the key to WikiSuccess
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Wikipedia's Manual of Style
 * Vandalism and Civility

 Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (username and date stamp).


 * If you would like to practice your new Wiki skills, the Sandbox is the place for you to do it.
 * Be civil, but have fun. That's what it's all about.

 If you'd like any recommendations for a few random articles to take a look at just for fun, go ahead and check out this eclectic list: Capybara — Lantana — Medic — Laurel McGoff — Moolack Beach — Oozlefinch — Oozlefinch — Polar fleece — Pom-pon — Ariana Richards 
 * Good luck, and have fun. We're glad to have you here! '
 * Good luck, and have fun. We're glad to have you here! '

David Krae
Can you tell me anything about him? What has he done? What else besides the Palme d'Or did he win? I want to help you to keep this page, and I don't want it to be speedy deleted. Just give me more info, and I will try to get it good. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  07:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

'The House' was Official Selection at the Canadian Filmmakers Festival in March 2006. It is currently broadcasting on Superchannel in Canada (www.superchannel.ca). He is a member of ACTRA (Alliance of Canadian Television and Radio Actors) He is a member of CFTPA (Canadian Film and Television Producers Association)through his company Aquila Pictures

Also, for clarification, it is the Golden Palm Award at Beverly Hills Film Festival. Which is different from the Palm D'Or which is at the Cannes Film Festival.
 * Oh, alright. Luckily, I found a link on Wikipedia to the Beverly Hills Film Festival, so I removed the Palme d'Or link and provided the other link. Since it's on Wikipedia, it should be notable enough. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  07:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

After doing thorough research, I believe we finally have enough for David Krae to be kept. I think he is notable. Are you his official Wikipedia account? If so, that's so cool. If you wish to respond to me, just click "91093" on my signature, and press the + tab at the top of the page by "edit this page". Don't forget to sign with four tildes ( ~ )! See you around! — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  07:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome! I'm always glad to help newcomers to Wikipedia. I think it's cool that this is the official Wikipedia site for David Krae and/or Aquila Pictures. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  07:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Hurray! The speedy deletion tags are officially removed, and David Krae's article will be kept. Thank you for giving me the information needed to assert notability. That's what ultimately kept it. Good job! I hope you can expand the article more, and good luck with everything! — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  07:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with this. Much appreciated.

Happy Valentine's Day!


FLc is wishing you a Happy Valentine's Day! This greeting promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the love by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Nomination of David Krae for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Krae is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Krae until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I am not having a private conversation with you over e-mail about this. You will communicate with me in public, on Wikipedia, or not at all.
 * Firstly, the Canadian Filmmakers Festival is not "programmed" by TIFF. It has a marketing partnership with TIFF and makes an effort to not overlap with TIFF's programming, but is owned and operated and programmed by a fully independent organization and not by TIFF per se.
 * Secondly, I did not say anything whatsoever about the credibility of The Hollywood Reporter. But the problem is that you are not the subject of that article, so it does not singlehandedly clinch you as notable enough for a Wikipedia article all by itself if it's the only reliable media source in the article. In order to be notable enough for an article, you and your films have to be the primary subjects of several media articles — being briefly mentioned in one news article is not enough all by itself, and the article cannot use primary sources like IMDb, non-notable blogs like Torontoist, social networking platforms like GoodReads or the self-published websites of organizations you're directly affiliated with as substitutes for media coverage.
 * Thirdly, no, the Beverly Hills Film Festival is not on the Berlin-Cannes-TIFF tier of internationally prominent megafestivals. It's not nothing, and I didn't say it was, but it is not a prominent enough film festival to instantly clinch the notability of a person who is otherwise not well-sourced enough to pass our sourcing requirements.
 * Fourthly, even if you did clear our notability standards, you still do not have any right to write your own article yourself: we are not a free public relations platform for people to publicize their own work by writing about themselves, we are an encyclopedia whose articles have to follow our notability and sourcing requirements, and have to be written objectively by people independent of the subject. You need to familiarize yourself with our conflict of interest rules, particularly the one that forbids writing about yourself autobiographically on here.
 * And finally, whatever you think about "the years of professional slander in the Canadian/Toronto film industry" that you think you've faced, neither I nor Wikipedia have anything to do with that. I am not a person who works in the film industry, or even has any connections with anybody who does, so I've literally never heard of you before. But the article has rules it has to follow, it isn't following them, and Wikipedia does not owe you inclusion in our project if the article is not meeting our rules. We, again, are not a free public relations platform on which people are entitled to have articles, and our inclusion rules are not based on whether anybody likes or dislikes you personally: they're based solely on whether or not the article is following our rules.
 * That's it. And again, I am not discussing this over private e-mail. Bearcat (talk) 23:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)