User talk:Ar558

Chart
I just wanted to tell you that the chart you uploaded (:File:Chart1.gif) is nice, and updated, but it has an error. Till the late 20s, the times were measured only to the one-fifth of a second (0.2s), rather than one tenth (0.1s). So, the marks on the chart showing 10.6 and 10.4 records should be 0.2s wide, not 0.1 as you made. Hope you can change this. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joshua Hill (racing driver)


The article Joshua Hill (racing driver) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 12:14, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joshua Hill (racing driver)


The article Joshua Hill (racing driver) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BIO. Very notable family, but he has not received sufficient attention for himself yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

1992 points tables
Hi Ar558. Thanks for the "standings after the race" tables you added to the 1992 Formula One race report articles. A couple of minor points in case you're planning to do any more: But apart from that, great work! Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 03:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Benetton were entered as a British team until 1996, and
 * the Constructors' points should be right-aligned, similar to the Drivers' points.

P.S. If you are interested in contributing to Formula One articles, you may be interested in joining the Formula One WikiProject. DH85868993 (talk) 03:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Silverstone
On the TV show Fifth Gear Jason Plato set a lap record of 2:22.14 for a production car on the new Arena layout in a Noble M600. Pretty sure Formula One has the lap record. Any sections titled lap record should discuss the official lap records and any tivial TV show records should be either minor footnotes, or not covered at all as they are of trivial importance. --Falcadore (talk) 11:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Why are you partially updating articles? Please edit properly next time
I noticed the edits you made today to Didier Cuche. Why would you add today's DH win to the list, but not even attempt to update all the other necessary items too? Things like the total number of wins, podiums, etc, everything that needed to be fixed in this subsequent edit. If you're going to make an edit, then you should make a complete and useful edit, not a partial incomplete edit that someone else needs to fix a few minutes later. And even worse, at the time you made the edits, the race was not even completed yet and so Cuche was not officially the winner yet. Someone else could have come from the high start numbers and won that race.

Please try to do a more thorough job in the future, otherwise just leave the article alone, and let someone else do the entire update. And do not update articles at all until the event in question has been officially completed. Thanks. --Seattle Skier (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

July 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Alexander Ovechkin. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Neil N   talk to me  02:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 2 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * On the 2014 United States Grand Prix page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=632208263 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F632208263%7C2014 United States Grand Prix%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Qed237. An edit that you recently made to UEFA Euro 2016 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Qed237&#160;(talk) 21:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

David Cameron
He's still a politician, even if he's no longer in office. I think if you look through other past Prime Ministers and party leaders who are no longer in office you'll find they're still described as politicians rather than former politicians. This is Paul (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Comparison with teammates
Please stop adding these tables to various articles, because that is against the consensus of the WP:FORMULA1. – Sabbatino (talk) 19:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lewis Hamilton shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kahastok talk 19:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mjroots (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black helicopter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Carter ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Black_helicopter check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Black_helicopter?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)