User talk:ArabtrueJews

July 2016
Your recent editing history at Arab Jews shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Aloha27 your work has been removed from other boards for vandalism. And Sro23 and your friend Aloah27 are posting lies and slander. You have not cited any source for your crap.''' You both lack knowledge about Jews and are posting non-cited Anti-Semitic lies.  Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing'''&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Aloha27   talk  17:39, 7 July 2016 (UTC) '''You need to be block Aloha27 ''' If you are an Administrator than why are you allowing racist, bigot, uncited material to remain on the site?

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Arab Jews. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.   Aloha27   talk  17:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Aloha27   talk  18:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 18:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

How can you be logged out when editing?

Final warning
After a look at your edits to Arab Jews, I'm surprised you're not blocked yet. One more removal of sourced material, and/or addition of your opinion, to that or any other article, and you will be. Bishonen &#124; talk 18:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC).

And after a look at the history of Arab Jews, I see that neither you nor the account User:ProudArabJews (which is obviously either you or a friend of yours) are here to help build an encyclopedia, but purely to push a particular point of view. Blocked indefinitely. Bishonen &#124; talk 18:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC).

July 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 18:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)